Loading…

Peripheral nerve block in ankle fracture surgery: a qualitative study of patients’ experiences

Summary Peripheral nerve blocks are popular as a mode of anaesthesia for limb surgery and their beneficial effects are well documented in elective surgery. However, concerns have been raised about potential rebound pain outweighing the benefits in acute ankle fracture surgery. Furthermore, pain scor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anaesthesia 2018-01, Vol.73 (1), p.49-58
Main Authors: Henningsen, M. J., Sort, R., Møller, A. M., Herling, S. F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-1c9daa758bd0170eeb65be01bf91d0fa6a749617f698921c1ae5d3de51b6f17a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-1c9daa758bd0170eeb65be01bf91d0fa6a749617f698921c1ae5d3de51b6f17a3
container_end_page 58
container_issue 1
container_start_page 49
container_title Anaesthesia
container_volume 73
creator Henningsen, M. J.
Sort, R.
Møller, A. M.
Herling, S. F.
description Summary Peripheral nerve blocks are popular as a mode of anaesthesia for limb surgery and their beneficial effects are well documented in elective surgery. However, concerns have been raised about potential rebound pain outweighing the benefits in acute ankle fracture surgery. Furthermore, pain scores and morphine consumption do not provide a full picture, as pain is subjective. To evaluate the clinical usefulness of peripheral nerve blocks, we explored patients’ expectations and experiences by means of semi‐structured interviews analysed with systematic text condensation. We obtained ethical approval and informed consent and sampled purposively among adult patients scheduled for ankle surgery with nerve blocks as the primary mode of anaesthesia. Patients were interviewed within 48 h postoperatively. Data saturation was reached after 13 interviews. We found that, despite pre‐emptive ibuprofen and paracetamol, some patients did experience excruciating rebound pain for up to 2 h, although most had little or no pain. The patients had doubts about what to do when the block wore off, which led to a risk of unnecessary pain levels or morphine overuse. Patients had difficulty understanding the effect and course of the nerve blocks. They had misunderstandings regarding the blocks’ effect on sensation, resulting in fear of feeling pain during surgery and of permanent nerve damage after surgery. However, patients valued the mental alertness, ability to ambulate and efficient pain relief provided by the blocks. We recommend that patients be given thorough and repeated information as we feel this is crucial in preventing undesirable responses from patients, and is likely to increase the overall clinical usefulness of nerve blocks in acute limb surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/anae.14088
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1954065347</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1954065347</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-1c9daa758bd0170eeb65be01bf91d0fa6a749617f698921c1ae5d3de51b6f17a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MFO3DAQxnELtYItcOEBkCUuqFJgxokTm9sKQVsJFQ5wDpNkAoFsEuwEure-Rl-PJ6npAgcO9cWy9NNf1ifEDsIBhnNIHfEBJmDMmphhnOpIQZJ8EjMAiCOVgN0QX7y_A0Bl0KyLDWVBK6X0TFxfsGuGW3bUyo7dI8ui7ct72XSSuvuWZe2oHCfH0k_uht3ySJJ8mKhtRhqbwP04VUvZ13IIb-5G__z7j-RfQ8hyV7LfEp9raj1vv96b4ur05PL4e3R2_u3H8fwsKmMbmwhLWxFl2hQVYAbMRaoLBixqixXUlFKW2BSzOrXGKiyRWFdxxRqLtMaM4k2xv-oOrn-Y2I_5ovElty113E8-R6sTSHWcZIHufaB3_eS68LugMmXApCYJ6utKla733nGdD65ZkFvmCPnL7vnL7vm_3QPefU1OxYKrd_o2dAC4Ak9Ny8v_pPL5z_nJKvoXPOWOvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1972808684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peripheral nerve block in ankle fracture surgery: a qualitative study of patients’ experiences</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Henningsen, M. J. ; Sort, R. ; Møller, A. M. ; Herling, S. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Henningsen, M. J. ; Sort, R. ; Møller, A. M. ; Herling, S. F.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Peripheral nerve blocks are popular as a mode of anaesthesia for limb surgery and their beneficial effects are well documented in elective surgery. However, concerns have been raised about potential rebound pain outweighing the benefits in acute ankle fracture surgery. Furthermore, pain scores and morphine consumption do not provide a full picture, as pain is subjective. To evaluate the clinical usefulness of peripheral nerve blocks, we explored patients’ expectations and experiences by means of semi‐structured interviews analysed with systematic text condensation. We obtained ethical approval and informed consent and sampled purposively among adult patients scheduled for ankle surgery with nerve blocks as the primary mode of anaesthesia. Patients were interviewed within 48 h postoperatively. Data saturation was reached after 13 interviews. We found that, despite pre‐emptive ibuprofen and paracetamol, some patients did experience excruciating rebound pain for up to 2 h, although most had little or no pain. The patients had doubts about what to do when the block wore off, which led to a risk of unnecessary pain levels or morphine overuse. Patients had difficulty understanding the effect and course of the nerve blocks. They had misunderstandings regarding the blocks’ effect on sensation, resulting in fear of feeling pain during surgery and of permanent nerve damage after surgery. However, patients valued the mental alertness, ability to ambulate and efficient pain relief provided by the blocks. We recommend that patients be given thorough and repeated information as we feel this is crucial in preventing undesirable responses from patients, and is likely to increase the overall clinical usefulness of nerve blocks in acute limb surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2409</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/anae.14088</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29052225</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Alertness ; Anesthesia ; Ankle ; ankle fracture ; Ethical standards ; Ethics ; Fractures ; Ibuprofen ; Informed consent ; Morphine ; Pain ; Paracetamol ; Patients ; peripheral nerve block ; postoperative pain ; qualitative methodology ; Qualitative research ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia, 2018-01, Vol.73 (1), p.49-58</ispartof><rights>2017 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland</rights><rights>2017 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-1c9daa758bd0170eeb65be01bf91d0fa6a749617f698921c1ae5d3de51b6f17a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-1c9daa758bd0170eeb65be01bf91d0fa6a749617f698921c1ae5d3de51b6f17a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29052225$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henningsen, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sort, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herling, S. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Peripheral nerve block in ankle fracture surgery: a qualitative study of patients’ experiences</title><title>Anaesthesia</title><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><description>Summary Peripheral nerve blocks are popular as a mode of anaesthesia for limb surgery and their beneficial effects are well documented in elective surgery. However, concerns have been raised about potential rebound pain outweighing the benefits in acute ankle fracture surgery. Furthermore, pain scores and morphine consumption do not provide a full picture, as pain is subjective. To evaluate the clinical usefulness of peripheral nerve blocks, we explored patients’ expectations and experiences by means of semi‐structured interviews analysed with systematic text condensation. We obtained ethical approval and informed consent and sampled purposively among adult patients scheduled for ankle surgery with nerve blocks as the primary mode of anaesthesia. Patients were interviewed within 48 h postoperatively. Data saturation was reached after 13 interviews. We found that, despite pre‐emptive ibuprofen and paracetamol, some patients did experience excruciating rebound pain for up to 2 h, although most had little or no pain. The patients had doubts about what to do when the block wore off, which led to a risk of unnecessary pain levels or morphine overuse. Patients had difficulty understanding the effect and course of the nerve blocks. They had misunderstandings regarding the blocks’ effect on sensation, resulting in fear of feeling pain during surgery and of permanent nerve damage after surgery. However, patients valued the mental alertness, ability to ambulate and efficient pain relief provided by the blocks. We recommend that patients be given thorough and repeated information as we feel this is crucial in preventing undesirable responses from patients, and is likely to increase the overall clinical usefulness of nerve blocks in acute limb surgery.</description><subject>Alertness</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Ankle</subject><subject>ankle fracture</subject><subject>Ethical standards</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Ibuprofen</subject><subject>Informed consent</subject><subject>Morphine</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Paracetamol</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>peripheral nerve block</subject><subject>postoperative pain</subject><subject>qualitative methodology</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0003-2409</issn><issn>1365-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90MFO3DAQxnELtYItcOEBkCUuqFJgxokTm9sKQVsJFQ5wDpNkAoFsEuwEure-Rl-PJ6npAgcO9cWy9NNf1ifEDsIBhnNIHfEBJmDMmphhnOpIQZJ8EjMAiCOVgN0QX7y_A0Bl0KyLDWVBK6X0TFxfsGuGW3bUyo7dI8ui7ct72XSSuvuWZe2oHCfH0k_uht3ySJJ8mKhtRhqbwP04VUvZ13IIb-5G__z7j-RfQ8hyV7LfEp9raj1vv96b4ur05PL4e3R2_u3H8fwsKmMbmwhLWxFl2hQVYAbMRaoLBixqixXUlFKW2BSzOrXGKiyRWFdxxRqLtMaM4k2xv-oOrn-Y2I_5ovElty113E8-R6sTSHWcZIHufaB3_eS68LugMmXApCYJ6utKla733nGdD65ZkFvmCPnL7vnL7vm_3QPefU1OxYKrd_o2dAC4Ak9Ny8v_pPL5z_nJKvoXPOWOvA</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Henningsen, M. J.</creator><creator>Sort, R.</creator><creator>Møller, A. M.</creator><creator>Herling, S. F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Peripheral nerve block in ankle fracture surgery: a qualitative study of patients’ experiences</title><author>Henningsen, M. J. ; Sort, R. ; Møller, A. M. ; Herling, S. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-1c9daa758bd0170eeb65be01bf91d0fa6a749617f698921c1ae5d3de51b6f17a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Alertness</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Ankle</topic><topic>ankle fracture</topic><topic>Ethical standards</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Ibuprofen</topic><topic>Informed consent</topic><topic>Morphine</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Paracetamol</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>peripheral nerve block</topic><topic>postoperative pain</topic><topic>qualitative methodology</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henningsen, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sort, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Møller, A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herling, S. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henningsen, M. J.</au><au>Sort, R.</au><au>Møller, A. M.</au><au>Herling, S. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peripheral nerve block in ankle fracture surgery: a qualitative study of patients’ experiences</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>49-58</pages><issn>0003-2409</issn><eissn>1365-2044</eissn><abstract>Summary Peripheral nerve blocks are popular as a mode of anaesthesia for limb surgery and their beneficial effects are well documented in elective surgery. However, concerns have been raised about potential rebound pain outweighing the benefits in acute ankle fracture surgery. Furthermore, pain scores and morphine consumption do not provide a full picture, as pain is subjective. To evaluate the clinical usefulness of peripheral nerve blocks, we explored patients’ expectations and experiences by means of semi‐structured interviews analysed with systematic text condensation. We obtained ethical approval and informed consent and sampled purposively among adult patients scheduled for ankle surgery with nerve blocks as the primary mode of anaesthesia. Patients were interviewed within 48 h postoperatively. Data saturation was reached after 13 interviews. We found that, despite pre‐emptive ibuprofen and paracetamol, some patients did experience excruciating rebound pain for up to 2 h, although most had little or no pain. The patients had doubts about what to do when the block wore off, which led to a risk of unnecessary pain levels or morphine overuse. Patients had difficulty understanding the effect and course of the nerve blocks. They had misunderstandings regarding the blocks’ effect on sensation, resulting in fear of feeling pain during surgery and of permanent nerve damage after surgery. However, patients valued the mental alertness, ability to ambulate and efficient pain relief provided by the blocks. We recommend that patients be given thorough and repeated information as we feel this is crucial in preventing undesirable responses from patients, and is likely to increase the overall clinical usefulness of nerve blocks in acute limb surgery.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>29052225</pmid><doi>10.1111/anae.14088</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2409
ispartof Anaesthesia, 2018-01, Vol.73 (1), p.49-58
issn 0003-2409
1365-2044
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1954065347
source Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)
subjects Alertness
Anesthesia
Ankle
ankle fracture
Ethical standards
Ethics
Fractures
Ibuprofen
Informed consent
Morphine
Pain
Paracetamol
Patients
peripheral nerve block
postoperative pain
qualitative methodology
Qualitative research
Surgery
title Peripheral nerve block in ankle fracture surgery: a qualitative study of patients’ experiences
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T00%3A40%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peripheral%20nerve%20block%20in%20ankle%20fracture%20surgery:%20a%20qualitative%20study%20of%20patients%E2%80%99%20experiences&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia&rft.au=Henningsen,%20M.%20J.&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=49-58&rft.issn=0003-2409&rft.eissn=1365-2044&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/anae.14088&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1954065347%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-1c9daa758bd0170eeb65be01bf91d0fa6a749617f698921c1ae5d3de51b6f17a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1972808684&rft_id=info:pmid/29052225&rfr_iscdi=true