Optimized monthly-fixed thermostat-setting scheme for maximum energy-savings and thermal comfort in air-conditioned spaces

• Published in: Applied energy 2008-05, Vol.85 (5), p.326-346
• Main Authors: Al-Sanea, Sami A., Zedan, M.F.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Air conditioning. Ventilation; Applied sciences; Economic data; Energy; Energy conservation; Energy economics; Energy policy; Energy. Thermal use of fuels; Exact sciences and technology; General, economic and professional studies; Heat transmission; Heating, air conditioning and ventilation; Miscellaneous; Techniques, equipment. Control. Metering; Thermal comfort; Thermostat settings; Thermostat settings Energy conservation Thermal comfort Heat transmission
• ISSN: 0306-2619; 1872-9118
• DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2007.06.019

The present study deals with energy conservation in buildings via reduction of cooling-and-heating transmission loads through walls by optimizing the indoor air-temperature settings. Maximum energy-saving and thermal-comfort are obtained for both yearly- and monthly-fixed thermostat settings. The transmission loads are calculated under the climatic conditions of Riyadh by using a dynamic heat-transfer model based on the finite-volume implicit procedure, which has been validated previously. The study utilizes a basic thermal-comfort chart where indoor air temperatures are selected inside the summer and winter comfort-zones, as a function of relative humidity, in a manner to provide the highest comfort-level while maximizing energy savings. The yearly-fixed thermostat settings range between 21.6°C and 24.1°C (70.9°F and 75.4°F), and those for the optimized monthly-fixed settings range between 20.1°C and 26.2°C (68.2°F and 79.1°F). For the yearly-fixed thermostat settings, the results show that about a 10% reduction in yearly cooling transmission load can be achieved per 1°C increase in thermostat setting. Despite a corresponding increase of about 14% in yearly heating transmission load, a net saving in the yearly total energy cost of about 4% can still be affected per 1°C increase in thermostat setting within the comfort zone. However, much bigger savings are achieved by utilizing an optimized monthly-fixed thermostat setting scheme developed in this study. Savings in energy cost between 26.8% and 33.6% compared with the yearly-fixed settings are obtained depending on the value of yearly-fixed setting. The corresponding reductions in peak loads compared with the yearly-fixed settings range between 13.5% and 25.6% in summer, and between 15.1% and 31.9% in winter depending on the yearly-fixed setting. These percentage savings in energy cost and reductions in peak loads are conservative since the yearly-fixed settings are themselves selected for high annual energy-savings while maintaining a high level of thermal comfort throughout the year.