Elk Decision-Making Rules Are Simplified in the Presence of Wolves

• Published in: Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2006-12, Vol.61 (2), p.277-289, Article 277
• Main Authors: Winnie, John, Christianson, David, Creel, Scott, Maxwell, Bruce
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal behavior; Canidae; Canyons; Cervus elaphus; Collars; Conifers; Creels; Decision making; Dependent variables; Elk; Elks; Foraging; Forest habitats; Habitat selection; Habitat utilization; Habitats; Independent variables; Information theory; Mathematical models; Parameter sensitivity; Parametric models; Predation; Prey; Risk; Timber; Variables; Wolves
• ISSN: 0340-5443; 1432-0762
• DOI: 10.1007/s00265-006-0258-1

The risk of predation drives many behavioral responses in prey. However, few studies have directly tested whether predation risk alters the way other variables influence prey behavior. Here we use information theory (Akaike's Information Criterion, AICc) in a novel way to test the hypothesis that the decision-making rules governing elk behavior are simplified by the presence of wolves. With elk habitat use as the dependent variable, we test whether the number of independent variables (i.e., the size of the models) that best predict this behavior differ when wolves are present vs absent. Thus, we use AICc scores simply to determine the number of variables to which elk respond when making decisions. We measured habitat use using 2,288 locations from GPS collars on 14 elk, over two winters (14 elk winters), in the Gallatin Canyon portion of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. We found that the use of three major habitat components (grass, conifer, sage) was sensitive to many variables on days that wolves were locally absent, with the best models (ΔAICc≤2) averaging 7.4 parameters. In contrast, habitat use was sensitive to few variables on days when wolves were present: the best models averaged only 2.5 parameters. Because fewer variables affect elk behavior in the presence of wolves, we conclude that elk use simpler decision-making rules in the presence of wolves. This simplification of decision-making rules implies that predation risk imposes selection pressures that do not allow prey to respond to other pressures in ways that they otherwise would. If the affected processes are important, then this indirect effect of predation is likely to be important.