Loading…

Baseline response rates affect resistance to change

The effect of response rates on resistance to change, measured as resistance to extinction, was examined in two experiments. In Experiment 1, responding in transition from a variable‐ratio schedule and its yoked‐interval counterpart to extinction was compared with pigeons. Following training on a mu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 2018-01, Vol.109 (1), p.164-175
Main Authors: Kuroda, Toshikazu, Cook, James E., Lattal, Kennon A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-8753cd92d940f4448e710b2474de6e430cbe361c4d82abadd50555f0e0913fb93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-8753cd92d940f4448e710b2474de6e430cbe361c4d82abadd50555f0e0913fb93
container_end_page 175
container_issue 1
container_start_page 164
container_title Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
container_volume 109
creator Kuroda, Toshikazu
Cook, James E.
Lattal, Kennon A.
description The effect of response rates on resistance to change, measured as resistance to extinction, was examined in two experiments. In Experiment 1, responding in transition from a variable‐ratio schedule and its yoked‐interval counterpart to extinction was compared with pigeons. Following training on a multiple variable‐ratio yoked‐interval schedule of reinforcement, in which response rates were higher in the former component, reinforcement was removed from both components during a single extended extinction session. Resistance to extinction in the yoked‐interval component was always either greater or equal to that in the variable‐ratio component. In Experiment 2, resistance to extinction was compared for two groups of rats that exhibited either high or low response rates when maintained on identical variable‐interval schedules. Resistance to extinction was greater for the lower‐response‐rate group. These results suggest that baseline response rate can contribute to resistance to change. Such effects, however, can only be revealed when baseline response rate and reinforcement rate are disentangled (Experiments 1 and 2) from the more usual circumstance where the two covary. Furthermore, they are more cleanly revealed when the programmed contingencies controlling high and low response rates are identical, as in Experiment 2.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jeab.285
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1959323645</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1959323645</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-8753cd92d940f4448e710b2474de6e430cbe361c4d82abadd50555f0e0913fb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK2Cv0ACXryk7meye2xL_aLgRc_LZndWU9KkZhOk_94NrQqCl5lh5uFheBG6JHhKMKa3azDFlEpxhMZEMZmynJBjNI4nmopYR-gshHUcVJbTUzSiCivOsnyM2NwEqMoakhbCtqlDHEwHITHeg-2GbRk6U1tIuiax76Z-g3N04k0V4OLQJ-j1bvmyeEhXz_ePi9kqtYwrkcpcMOsUdYpjzzmXkBNcUJ5zBxlwhm0BLCOWO0lNYZwTWAjhMWBFmC8Um6CbvXfbNh89hE5vymChqkwNTR80UUIxyjIuInr9B103fVvH7yKl6EBK-Su0bRNCC15v23Jj2p0mWA9B6iFIHYOM6NVB2BcbcD_gd3IRSPfAZ1nB7l-RflrO5oPwC3hgeko</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1992195988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Baseline response rates affect resistance to change</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Kuroda, Toshikazu ; Cook, James E. ; Lattal, Kennon A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuroda, Toshikazu ; Cook, James E. ; Lattal, Kennon A.</creatorcontrib><description>The effect of response rates on resistance to change, measured as resistance to extinction, was examined in two experiments. In Experiment 1, responding in transition from a variable‐ratio schedule and its yoked‐interval counterpart to extinction was compared with pigeons. Following training on a multiple variable‐ratio yoked‐interval schedule of reinforcement, in which response rates were higher in the former component, reinforcement was removed from both components during a single extended extinction session. Resistance to extinction in the yoked‐interval component was always either greater or equal to that in the variable‐ratio component. In Experiment 2, resistance to extinction was compared for two groups of rats that exhibited either high or low response rates when maintained on identical variable‐interval schedules. Resistance to extinction was greater for the lower‐response‐rate group. These results suggest that baseline response rate can contribute to resistance to change. Such effects, however, can only be revealed when baseline response rate and reinforcement rate are disentangled (Experiments 1 and 2) from the more usual circumstance where the two covary. Furthermore, they are more cleanly revealed when the programmed contingencies controlling high and low response rates are identical, as in Experiment 2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jeab.285</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29094367</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animals ; Behavioral psychology ; Columbidae ; Conditioning, Operant ; Experimental psychology ; extinction ; Extinction, Psychological ; Male ; pigeons ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Reinforcement (Psychology) ; Reinforcement Schedule ; resistance to change ; Resistance to extinction ; response rate ; Response rates</subject><ispartof>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2018-01, Vol.109 (1), p.164-175</ispartof><rights>2017 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><rights>2017 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.</rights><rights>2018 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-8753cd92d940f4448e710b2474de6e430cbe361c4d82abadd50555f0e0913fb93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-8753cd92d940f4448e710b2474de6e430cbe361c4d82abadd50555f0e0913fb93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29094367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuroda, Toshikazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, James E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lattal, Kennon A.</creatorcontrib><title>Baseline response rates affect resistance to change</title><title>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</title><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><description>The effect of response rates on resistance to change, measured as resistance to extinction, was examined in two experiments. In Experiment 1, responding in transition from a variable‐ratio schedule and its yoked‐interval counterpart to extinction was compared with pigeons. Following training on a multiple variable‐ratio yoked‐interval schedule of reinforcement, in which response rates were higher in the former component, reinforcement was removed from both components during a single extended extinction session. Resistance to extinction in the yoked‐interval component was always either greater or equal to that in the variable‐ratio component. In Experiment 2, resistance to extinction was compared for two groups of rats that exhibited either high or low response rates when maintained on identical variable‐interval schedules. Resistance to extinction was greater for the lower‐response‐rate group. These results suggest that baseline response rate can contribute to resistance to change. Such effects, however, can only be revealed when baseline response rate and reinforcement rate are disentangled (Experiments 1 and 2) from the more usual circumstance where the two covary. Furthermore, they are more cleanly revealed when the programmed contingencies controlling high and low response rates are identical, as in Experiment 2.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavioral psychology</subject><subject>Columbidae</subject><subject>Conditioning, Operant</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>extinction</subject><subject>Extinction, Psychological</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>pigeons</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><subject>Reinforcement Schedule</subject><subject>resistance to change</subject><subject>Resistance to extinction</subject><subject>response rate</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><issn>0022-5002</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK2Cv0ACXryk7meye2xL_aLgRc_LZndWU9KkZhOk_94NrQqCl5lh5uFheBG6JHhKMKa3azDFlEpxhMZEMZmynJBjNI4nmopYR-gshHUcVJbTUzSiCivOsnyM2NwEqMoakhbCtqlDHEwHITHeg-2GbRk6U1tIuiax76Z-g3N04k0V4OLQJ-j1bvmyeEhXz_ePi9kqtYwrkcpcMOsUdYpjzzmXkBNcUJ5zBxlwhm0BLCOWO0lNYZwTWAjhMWBFmC8Um6CbvXfbNh89hE5vymChqkwNTR80UUIxyjIuInr9B103fVvH7yKl6EBK-Su0bRNCC15v23Jj2p0mWA9B6iFIHYOM6NVB2BcbcD_gd3IRSPfAZ1nB7l-RflrO5oPwC3hgeko</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Kuroda, Toshikazu</creator><creator>Cook, James E.</creator><creator>Lattal, Kennon A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Baseline response rates affect resistance to change</title><author>Kuroda, Toshikazu ; Cook, James E. ; Lattal, Kennon A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-8753cd92d940f4448e710b2474de6e430cbe361c4d82abadd50555f0e0913fb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavioral psychology</topic><topic>Columbidae</topic><topic>Conditioning, Operant</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>extinction</topic><topic>Extinction, Psychological</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>pigeons</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Reinforcement (Psychology)</topic><topic>Reinforcement Schedule</topic><topic>resistance to change</topic><topic>Resistance to extinction</topic><topic>response rate</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuroda, Toshikazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, James E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lattal, Kennon A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuroda, Toshikazu</au><au>Cook, James E.</au><au>Lattal, Kennon A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Baseline response rates affect resistance to change</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>164</spage><epage>175</epage><pages>164-175</pages><issn>0022-5002</issn><eissn>1938-3711</eissn><abstract>The effect of response rates on resistance to change, measured as resistance to extinction, was examined in two experiments. In Experiment 1, responding in transition from a variable‐ratio schedule and its yoked‐interval counterpart to extinction was compared with pigeons. Following training on a multiple variable‐ratio yoked‐interval schedule of reinforcement, in which response rates were higher in the former component, reinforcement was removed from both components during a single extended extinction session. Resistance to extinction in the yoked‐interval component was always either greater or equal to that in the variable‐ratio component. In Experiment 2, resistance to extinction was compared for two groups of rats that exhibited either high or low response rates when maintained on identical variable‐interval schedules. Resistance to extinction was greater for the lower‐response‐rate group. These results suggest that baseline response rate can contribute to resistance to change. Such effects, however, can only be revealed when baseline response rate and reinforcement rate are disentangled (Experiments 1 and 2) from the more usual circumstance where the two covary. Furthermore, they are more cleanly revealed when the programmed contingencies controlling high and low response rates are identical, as in Experiment 2.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29094367</pmid><doi>10.1002/jeab.285</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5002
ispartof Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2018-01, Vol.109 (1), p.164-175
issn 0022-5002
1938-3711
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1959323645
source Wiley
subjects Animal behavior
Animals
Behavioral psychology
Columbidae
Conditioning, Operant
Experimental psychology
extinction
Extinction, Psychological
Male
pigeons
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Reinforcement Schedule
resistance to change
Resistance to extinction
response rate
Response rates
title Baseline response rates affect resistance to change
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A41%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Baseline%20response%20rates%20affect%20resistance%20to%20change&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20experimental%20analysis%20of%20behavior&rft.au=Kuroda,%20Toshikazu&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=164&rft.epage=175&rft.pages=164-175&rft.issn=0022-5002&rft.eissn=1938-3711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jeab.285&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1959323645%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-8753cd92d940f4448e710b2474de6e430cbe361c4d82abadd50555f0e0913fb93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1992195988&rft_id=info:pmid/29094367&rfr_iscdi=true