Loading…
Baseline response rates affect resistance to change
The effect of response rates on resistance to change, measured as resistance to extinction, was examined in two experiments. In Experiment 1, responding in transition from a variable‐ratio schedule and its yoked‐interval counterpart to extinction was compared with pigeons. Following training on a mu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 2018-01, Vol.109 (1), p.164-175 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-8753cd92d940f4448e710b2474de6e430cbe361c4d82abadd50555f0e0913fb93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-8753cd92d940f4448e710b2474de6e430cbe361c4d82abadd50555f0e0913fb93 |
container_end_page | 175 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 164 |
container_title | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior |
container_volume | 109 |
creator | Kuroda, Toshikazu Cook, James E. Lattal, Kennon A. |
description | The effect of response rates on resistance to change, measured as resistance to extinction, was examined in two experiments. In Experiment 1, responding in transition from a variable‐ratio schedule and its yoked‐interval counterpart to extinction was compared with pigeons. Following training on a multiple variable‐ratio yoked‐interval schedule of reinforcement, in which response rates were higher in the former component, reinforcement was removed from both components during a single extended extinction session. Resistance to extinction in the yoked‐interval component was always either greater or equal to that in the variable‐ratio component. In Experiment 2, resistance to extinction was compared for two groups of rats that exhibited either high or low response rates when maintained on identical variable‐interval schedules. Resistance to extinction was greater for the lower‐response‐rate group. These results suggest that baseline response rate can contribute to resistance to change. Such effects, however, can only be revealed when baseline response rate and reinforcement rate are disentangled (Experiments 1 and 2) from the more usual circumstance where the two covary. Furthermore, they are more cleanly revealed when the programmed contingencies controlling high and low response rates are identical, as in Experiment 2. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jeab.285 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1959323645</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1959323645</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-8753cd92d940f4448e710b2474de6e430cbe361c4d82abadd50555f0e0913fb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK2Cv0ACXryk7meye2xL_aLgRc_LZndWU9KkZhOk_94NrQqCl5lh5uFheBG6JHhKMKa3azDFlEpxhMZEMZmynJBjNI4nmopYR-gshHUcVJbTUzSiCivOsnyM2NwEqMoakhbCtqlDHEwHITHeg-2GbRk6U1tIuiax76Z-g3N04k0V4OLQJ-j1bvmyeEhXz_ePi9kqtYwrkcpcMOsUdYpjzzmXkBNcUJ5zBxlwhm0BLCOWO0lNYZwTWAjhMWBFmC8Um6CbvXfbNh89hE5vymChqkwNTR80UUIxyjIuInr9B103fVvH7yKl6EBK-Su0bRNCC15v23Jj2p0mWA9B6iFIHYOM6NVB2BcbcD_gd3IRSPfAZ1nB7l-RflrO5oPwC3hgeko</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1992195988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Baseline response rates affect resistance to change</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Kuroda, Toshikazu ; Cook, James E. ; Lattal, Kennon A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuroda, Toshikazu ; Cook, James E. ; Lattal, Kennon A.</creatorcontrib><description>The effect of response rates on resistance to change, measured as resistance to extinction, was examined in two experiments. In Experiment 1, responding in transition from a variable‐ratio schedule and its yoked‐interval counterpart to extinction was compared with pigeons. Following training on a multiple variable‐ratio yoked‐interval schedule of reinforcement, in which response rates were higher in the former component, reinforcement was removed from both components during a single extended extinction session. Resistance to extinction in the yoked‐interval component was always either greater or equal to that in the variable‐ratio component. In Experiment 2, resistance to extinction was compared for two groups of rats that exhibited either high or low response rates when maintained on identical variable‐interval schedules. Resistance to extinction was greater for the lower‐response‐rate group. These results suggest that baseline response rate can contribute to resistance to change. Such effects, however, can only be revealed when baseline response rate and reinforcement rate are disentangled (Experiments 1 and 2) from the more usual circumstance where the two covary. Furthermore, they are more cleanly revealed when the programmed contingencies controlling high and low response rates are identical, as in Experiment 2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jeab.285</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29094367</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animals ; Behavioral psychology ; Columbidae ; Conditioning, Operant ; Experimental psychology ; extinction ; Extinction, Psychological ; Male ; pigeons ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Reinforcement (Psychology) ; Reinforcement Schedule ; resistance to change ; Resistance to extinction ; response rate ; Response rates</subject><ispartof>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2018-01, Vol.109 (1), p.164-175</ispartof><rights>2017 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><rights>2017 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.</rights><rights>2018 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-8753cd92d940f4448e710b2474de6e430cbe361c4d82abadd50555f0e0913fb93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-8753cd92d940f4448e710b2474de6e430cbe361c4d82abadd50555f0e0913fb93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29094367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuroda, Toshikazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, James E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lattal, Kennon A.</creatorcontrib><title>Baseline response rates affect resistance to change</title><title>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</title><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><description>The effect of response rates on resistance to change, measured as resistance to extinction, was examined in two experiments. In Experiment 1, responding in transition from a variable‐ratio schedule and its yoked‐interval counterpart to extinction was compared with pigeons. Following training on a multiple variable‐ratio yoked‐interval schedule of reinforcement, in which response rates were higher in the former component, reinforcement was removed from both components during a single extended extinction session. Resistance to extinction in the yoked‐interval component was always either greater or equal to that in the variable‐ratio component. In Experiment 2, resistance to extinction was compared for two groups of rats that exhibited either high or low response rates when maintained on identical variable‐interval schedules. Resistance to extinction was greater for the lower‐response‐rate group. These results suggest that baseline response rate can contribute to resistance to change. Such effects, however, can only be revealed when baseline response rate and reinforcement rate are disentangled (Experiments 1 and 2) from the more usual circumstance where the two covary. Furthermore, they are more cleanly revealed when the programmed contingencies controlling high and low response rates are identical, as in Experiment 2.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavioral psychology</subject><subject>Columbidae</subject><subject>Conditioning, Operant</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>extinction</subject><subject>Extinction, Psychological</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>pigeons</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><subject>Reinforcement Schedule</subject><subject>resistance to change</subject><subject>Resistance to extinction</subject><subject>response rate</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><issn>0022-5002</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK2Cv0ACXryk7meye2xL_aLgRc_LZndWU9KkZhOk_94NrQqCl5lh5uFheBG6JHhKMKa3azDFlEpxhMZEMZmynJBjNI4nmopYR-gshHUcVJbTUzSiCivOsnyM2NwEqMoakhbCtqlDHEwHITHeg-2GbRk6U1tIuiax76Z-g3N04k0V4OLQJ-j1bvmyeEhXz_ePi9kqtYwrkcpcMOsUdYpjzzmXkBNcUJ5zBxlwhm0BLCOWO0lNYZwTWAjhMWBFmC8Um6CbvXfbNh89hE5vymChqkwNTR80UUIxyjIuInr9B103fVvH7yKl6EBK-Su0bRNCC15v23Jj2p0mWA9B6iFIHYOM6NVB2BcbcD_gd3IRSPfAZ1nB7l-RflrO5oPwC3hgeko</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Kuroda, Toshikazu</creator><creator>Cook, James E.</creator><creator>Lattal, Kennon A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Baseline response rates affect resistance to change</title><author>Kuroda, Toshikazu ; Cook, James E. ; Lattal, Kennon A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-8753cd92d940f4448e710b2474de6e430cbe361c4d82abadd50555f0e0913fb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavioral psychology</topic><topic>Columbidae</topic><topic>Conditioning, Operant</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>extinction</topic><topic>Extinction, Psychological</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>pigeons</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Reinforcement (Psychology)</topic><topic>Reinforcement Schedule</topic><topic>resistance to change</topic><topic>Resistance to extinction</topic><topic>response rate</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuroda, Toshikazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, James E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lattal, Kennon A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuroda, Toshikazu</au><au>Cook, James E.</au><au>Lattal, Kennon A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Baseline response rates affect resistance to change</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>164</spage><epage>175</epage><pages>164-175</pages><issn>0022-5002</issn><eissn>1938-3711</eissn><abstract>The effect of response rates on resistance to change, measured as resistance to extinction, was examined in two experiments. In Experiment 1, responding in transition from a variable‐ratio schedule and its yoked‐interval counterpart to extinction was compared with pigeons. Following training on a multiple variable‐ratio yoked‐interval schedule of reinforcement, in which response rates were higher in the former component, reinforcement was removed from both components during a single extended extinction session. Resistance to extinction in the yoked‐interval component was always either greater or equal to that in the variable‐ratio component. In Experiment 2, resistance to extinction was compared for two groups of rats that exhibited either high or low response rates when maintained on identical variable‐interval schedules. Resistance to extinction was greater for the lower‐response‐rate group. These results suggest that baseline response rate can contribute to resistance to change. Such effects, however, can only be revealed when baseline response rate and reinforcement rate are disentangled (Experiments 1 and 2) from the more usual circumstance where the two covary. Furthermore, they are more cleanly revealed when the programmed contingencies controlling high and low response rates are identical, as in Experiment 2.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29094367</pmid><doi>10.1002/jeab.285</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-5002 |
ispartof | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2018-01, Vol.109 (1), p.164-175 |
issn | 0022-5002 1938-3711 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1959323645 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Animal behavior Animals Behavioral psychology Columbidae Conditioning, Operant Experimental psychology extinction Extinction, Psychological Male pigeons Rats Rats, Sprague-Dawley Reinforcement (Psychology) Reinforcement Schedule resistance to change Resistance to extinction response rate Response rates |
title | Baseline response rates affect resistance to change |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A41%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Baseline%20response%20rates%20affect%20resistance%20to%20change&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20experimental%20analysis%20of%20behavior&rft.au=Kuroda,%20Toshikazu&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=164&rft.epage=175&rft.pages=164-175&rft.issn=0022-5002&rft.eissn=1938-3711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jeab.285&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1959323645%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-8753cd92d940f4448e710b2474de6e430cbe361c4d82abadd50555f0e0913fb93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1992195988&rft_id=info:pmid/29094367&rfr_iscdi=true |