Loading…

GENETIC CONSEQUENCES OF REINTRODUCTIONS: AN EXAMPLE FROM OREGON PRONGHORN ANTELOPE (ANTILOCAPRA AMERICANA)

In 1969, 17 pronghorn were reintroduced onto Umatilla Army Base in Oregon with no subsequent translocations or immigration into this fully enclosed area. We explored the genetic signature this event left on the population using a combination of microsatellite genotypes and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of wildlife management 2005-10, Vol.69 (4), p.1463-1474
Main Authors: STEPHEN, CATHERINE L, WHITTAKER, DON G, GILLIS, DON, COX, LINDSEY L, RHODES, OLIN E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4480-26aee0135b3d0718e670cfb5570cefc7ff049e9fbf8e7ed56bde7a95ebd7dab23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4480-26aee0135b3d0718e670cfb5570cefc7ff049e9fbf8e7ed56bde7a95ebd7dab23
container_end_page 1474
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1463
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 69
creator STEPHEN, CATHERINE L
WHITTAKER, DON G
GILLIS, DON
COX, LINDSEY L
RHODES, OLIN E
description In 1969, 17 pronghorn were reintroduced onto Umatilla Army Base in Oregon with no subsequent translocations or immigration into this fully enclosed area. We explored the genetic signature this event left on the population using a combination of microsatellite genotypes and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequencing data of this population. We compared the present day Umatilla herd to its source population and to a southeastern Oregon population. We found the reintroduced population had sharply lower genetic diversity compared to its source despite its rapid increase in population size following the initial founding event. It is likely the observed loss of diversity and the significant differentiation observed between the Umatilla herd and its source was a function of the low number of founders and stochastic losses of diversity in subsequent generations. We observed significant haplotypic and genotypic differentiation between the reintroduced population and its source (GST = 0.063, FST = 0.078, p < 0.001) that was approximately 3.5 times that found between the source and the southeastern population (GST = 0.018, FST = 0.021, p < 0.001). Moreover, 2 rare alleles in the source population were found in high frequency in the translocated population. The founding effect, stochastic shifts in allele frequencies each generation, restricted gene flow, and variance in the segregation of alleles related to a polygamous mating system have contributed to the significant differentiation observed between the Umatilla herd and its source. The results of this study can be applied directly to the management of ongoing translocation activities within Oregon.
doi_str_mv 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)69[1463:GCORAE]2.0.CO;2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19620904</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3803506</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3803506</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4480-26aee0135b3d0718e670cfb5570cefc7ff049e9fbf8e7ed56bde7a95ebd7dab23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkV9v0zAUxS0EEqXwDXiweEDbQ4rt_HEynkLmZoHUbrNUm4TQVdI6UkrXjLgV7NvjKKgPPO7pWro_H517DkIzSmaMRu4nQhhzfI_eXzBC_Msg-k69wL1KE1XE4gebkVmiPrMXaGJh7rCQ8pdocv70Gr0xZkeIS2kYTNAuFVKUWYITJW_Fai1kIm6xmuNCZLIs1PU6KTO7usKxxOI-XixzgeeFWmBViFRJvCyUTG9UIS1QilwtBb6wryxXSbwsYhwvRJElsYwv36JXTbU3-t2_OUXruSiTGydXqSVyp_a8kDgsqLQm1PVrd0s4DXXAyaapfd8O3Wx40xAv0lFTN6HmeusH9VbzKvJ1veXbqmbuFH0cdR_77tdJmyM8tGaj9_vqoLuTARoFjETEs-CH_8Bdd-oP1hsw17NZRzbXKZqP0KbvjOl1A499-1D1T0AJDH3AEC0M0cLQBwQRDH3A2AcwIJAoGGx9G4V-t3v99EwV-Hq3SCknVu39qLYzx64_q7khcX0yuHbGdWuO-s95XfU_IeAu9-FOpuAXq_zLijIYorge-brtuoN-7o1_ARHJu60</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234219946</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>GENETIC CONSEQUENCES OF REINTRODUCTIONS: AN EXAMPLE FROM OREGON PRONGHORN ANTELOPE (ANTILOCAPRA AMERICANA)</title><source>Wiley</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>STEPHEN, CATHERINE L ; WHITTAKER, DON G ; GILLIS, DON ; COX, LINDSEY L ; RHODES, OLIN E</creator><contributor>McCorquodale</contributor><creatorcontrib>STEPHEN, CATHERINE L ; WHITTAKER, DON G ; GILLIS, DON ; COX, LINDSEY L ; RHODES, OLIN E ; McCorquodale</creatorcontrib><description>In 1969, 17 pronghorn were reintroduced onto Umatilla Army Base in Oregon with no subsequent translocations or immigration into this fully enclosed area. We explored the genetic signature this event left on the population using a combination of microsatellite genotypes and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequencing data of this population. We compared the present day Umatilla herd to its source population and to a southeastern Oregon population. We found the reintroduced population had sharply lower genetic diversity compared to its source despite its rapid increase in population size following the initial founding event. It is likely the observed loss of diversity and the significant differentiation observed between the Umatilla herd and its source was a function of the low number of founders and stochastic losses of diversity in subsequent generations. We observed significant haplotypic and genotypic differentiation between the reintroduced population and its source (GST = 0.063, FST = 0.078, p &lt; 0.001) that was approximately 3.5 times that found between the source and the southeastern population (GST = 0.018, FST = 0.021, p &lt; 0.001). Moreover, 2 rare alleles in the source population were found in high frequency in the translocated population. The founding effect, stochastic shifts in allele frequencies each generation, restricted gene flow, and variance in the segregation of alleles related to a polygamous mating system have contributed to the significant differentiation observed between the Umatilla herd and its source. The results of this study can be applied directly to the management of ongoing translocation activities within Oregon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)69[1463:GCORAE]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Alleles ; Animal populations ; Antilocapra americana ; Ecological genetics ; Evolutionary genetics ; Genetic diversity ; Genetic loci ; Genotypes ; Haplotypes ; Herds ; Microsatellites ; Mitochondrial DNA ; Oregon ; Population genetics ; Population number ; pronghorn antelope ; reintroduction ; Species reintroduction ; Translocation ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2005-10, Vol.69 (4), p.1463-1474</ispartof><rights>The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>2005 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright Alliance Communications Group, A Division of Allen Press, Inc. Oct 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4480-26aee0135b3d0718e670cfb5570cefc7ff049e9fbf8e7ed56bde7a95ebd7dab23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4480-26aee0135b3d0718e670cfb5570cefc7ff049e9fbf8e7ed56bde7a95ebd7dab23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3803506$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3803506$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,58236,58469</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>McCorquodale</contributor><creatorcontrib>STEPHEN, CATHERINE L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHITTAKER, DON G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILLIS, DON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COX, LINDSEY L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RHODES, OLIN E</creatorcontrib><title>GENETIC CONSEQUENCES OF REINTRODUCTIONS: AN EXAMPLE FROM OREGON PRONGHORN ANTELOPE (ANTILOCAPRA AMERICANA)</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>In 1969, 17 pronghorn were reintroduced onto Umatilla Army Base in Oregon with no subsequent translocations or immigration into this fully enclosed area. We explored the genetic signature this event left on the population using a combination of microsatellite genotypes and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequencing data of this population. We compared the present day Umatilla herd to its source population and to a southeastern Oregon population. We found the reintroduced population had sharply lower genetic diversity compared to its source despite its rapid increase in population size following the initial founding event. It is likely the observed loss of diversity and the significant differentiation observed between the Umatilla herd and its source was a function of the low number of founders and stochastic losses of diversity in subsequent generations. We observed significant haplotypic and genotypic differentiation between the reintroduced population and its source (GST = 0.063, FST = 0.078, p &lt; 0.001) that was approximately 3.5 times that found between the source and the southeastern population (GST = 0.018, FST = 0.021, p &lt; 0.001). Moreover, 2 rare alleles in the source population were found in high frequency in the translocated population. The founding effect, stochastic shifts in allele frequencies each generation, restricted gene flow, and variance in the segregation of alleles related to a polygamous mating system have contributed to the significant differentiation observed between the Umatilla herd and its source. The results of this study can be applied directly to the management of ongoing translocation activities within Oregon.</description><subject>Alleles</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Antilocapra americana</subject><subject>Ecological genetics</subject><subject>Evolutionary genetics</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genetic loci</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Haplotypes</subject><subject>Herds</subject><subject>Microsatellites</subject><subject>Mitochondrial DNA</subject><subject>Oregon</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>pronghorn antelope</subject><subject>reintroduction</subject><subject>Species reintroduction</subject><subject>Translocation</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkV9v0zAUxS0EEqXwDXiweEDbQ4rt_HEynkLmZoHUbrNUm4TQVdI6UkrXjLgV7NvjKKgPPO7pWro_H517DkIzSmaMRu4nQhhzfI_eXzBC_Msg-k69wL1KE1XE4gebkVmiPrMXaGJh7rCQ8pdocv70Gr0xZkeIS2kYTNAuFVKUWYITJW_Fai1kIm6xmuNCZLIs1PU6KTO7usKxxOI-XixzgeeFWmBViFRJvCyUTG9UIS1QilwtBb6wryxXSbwsYhwvRJElsYwv36JXTbU3-t2_OUXruSiTGydXqSVyp_a8kDgsqLQm1PVrd0s4DXXAyaapfd8O3Wx40xAv0lFTN6HmeusH9VbzKvJ1veXbqmbuFH0cdR_77tdJmyM8tGaj9_vqoLuTARoFjETEs-CH_8Bdd-oP1hsw17NZRzbXKZqP0KbvjOl1A499-1D1T0AJDH3AEC0M0cLQBwQRDH3A2AcwIJAoGGx9G4V-t3v99EwV-Hq3SCknVu39qLYzx64_q7khcX0yuHbGdWuO-s95XfU_IeAu9-FOpuAXq_zLijIYorge-brtuoN-7o1_ARHJu60</recordid><startdate>200510</startdate><enddate>200510</enddate><creator>STEPHEN, CATHERINE L</creator><creator>WHITTAKER, DON G</creator><creator>GILLIS, DON</creator><creator>COX, LINDSEY L</creator><creator>RHODES, OLIN E</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>The Wildlife Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200510</creationdate><title>GENETIC CONSEQUENCES OF REINTRODUCTIONS: AN EXAMPLE FROM OREGON PRONGHORN ANTELOPE (ANTILOCAPRA AMERICANA)</title><author>STEPHEN, CATHERINE L ; WHITTAKER, DON G ; GILLIS, DON ; COX, LINDSEY L ; RHODES, OLIN E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4480-26aee0135b3d0718e670cfb5570cefc7ff049e9fbf8e7ed56bde7a95ebd7dab23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Alleles</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Antilocapra americana</topic><topic>Ecological genetics</topic><topic>Evolutionary genetics</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genetic loci</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Haplotypes</topic><topic>Herds</topic><topic>Microsatellites</topic><topic>Mitochondrial DNA</topic><topic>Oregon</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>pronghorn antelope</topic><topic>reintroduction</topic><topic>Species reintroduction</topic><topic>Translocation</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>STEPHEN, CATHERINE L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHITTAKER, DON G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILLIS, DON</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COX, LINDSEY L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RHODES, OLIN E</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>STEPHEN, CATHERINE L</au><au>WHITTAKER, DON G</au><au>GILLIS, DON</au><au>COX, LINDSEY L</au><au>RHODES, OLIN E</au><au>McCorquodale</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>GENETIC CONSEQUENCES OF REINTRODUCTIONS: AN EXAMPLE FROM OREGON PRONGHORN ANTELOPE (ANTILOCAPRA AMERICANA)</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2005-10</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1463</spage><epage>1474</epage><pages>1463-1474</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>In 1969, 17 pronghorn were reintroduced onto Umatilla Army Base in Oregon with no subsequent translocations or immigration into this fully enclosed area. We explored the genetic signature this event left on the population using a combination of microsatellite genotypes and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequencing data of this population. We compared the present day Umatilla herd to its source population and to a southeastern Oregon population. We found the reintroduced population had sharply lower genetic diversity compared to its source despite its rapid increase in population size following the initial founding event. It is likely the observed loss of diversity and the significant differentiation observed between the Umatilla herd and its source was a function of the low number of founders and stochastic losses of diversity in subsequent generations. We observed significant haplotypic and genotypic differentiation between the reintroduced population and its source (GST = 0.063, FST = 0.078, p &lt; 0.001) that was approximately 3.5 times that found between the source and the southeastern population (GST = 0.018, FST = 0.021, p &lt; 0.001). Moreover, 2 rare alleles in the source population were found in high frequency in the translocated population. The founding effect, stochastic shifts in allele frequencies each generation, restricted gene flow, and variance in the segregation of alleles related to a polygamous mating system have contributed to the significant differentiation observed between the Umatilla herd and its source. The results of this study can be applied directly to the management of ongoing translocation activities within Oregon.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.2193/0022-541X(2005)69[1463:GCORAE]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2005-10, Vol.69 (4), p.1463-1474
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19620904
source Wiley; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Alleles
Animal populations
Antilocapra americana
Ecological genetics
Evolutionary genetics
Genetic diversity
Genetic loci
Genotypes
Haplotypes
Herds
Microsatellites
Mitochondrial DNA
Oregon
Population genetics
Population number
pronghorn antelope
reintroduction
Species reintroduction
Translocation
Wildlife management
title GENETIC CONSEQUENCES OF REINTRODUCTIONS: AN EXAMPLE FROM OREGON PRONGHORN ANTELOPE (ANTILOCAPRA AMERICANA)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T18%3A12%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=GENETIC%20CONSEQUENCES%20OF%20REINTRODUCTIONS:%20AN%20EXAMPLE%20FROM%20OREGON%20PRONGHORN%20ANTELOPE%20(ANTILOCAPRA%20AMERICANA)&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=STEPHEN,%20CATHERINE%20L&rft.date=2005-10&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1463&rft.epage=1474&rft.pages=1463-1474&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2193/0022-541X(2005)69%5B1463:GCORAE%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3803506%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4480-26aee0135b3d0718e670cfb5570cefc7ff049e9fbf8e7ed56bde7a95ebd7dab23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234219946&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3803506&rfr_iscdi=true