Effect of species and spacing of fast-growing nurse trees on growth of an indigenous tree, Hopea odorata Roxb., in northeast Thailand

• Published in: Forest ecology and management 2009-01, Vol.257 (2), p.644-652
• Main Authors: Sakai, Atsushi, Visaratana, Thiti, Vacharangkura, Tosporn, Thai-ngam, Ratana, Tanaka, Nobuyuki, Ishizuka, Moriyoshi, Nakamura, Shozo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acacia auriculiformis; Animal and plant ecology; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; basal area; Biological and medical sciences; ecological restoration; Eucalyptus camaldulensis; Forest management; Forest management. Stand types and stand dynamics. Silvicultural treatments. Tending of stands. Natural regeneration; forest plantations; forest thinning; forest trees; Forestry; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Hopea; indigenous species; Senna siamea; spatial distribution; Synecology; Terrestrial ecosystems; Thinning; tree growth; tree mortality; Two-storied forest management
• ISSN: 0378-1127; 1872-7042
• DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.048

We tested the effects of species and spacing of nurse trees on the growth of Hopea odorata, a dipterocarp tree indigenous to Southeast Asia, in a two-storied forest management system in northeast Thailand. Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Acacia auriculiformis, and Senna siamea were planted as nurse trees in 1987 at spacings of 4 m × 8 m, 2 m × 8 m, 4 m × 4 m, and 2 m × 4 m in the Sakaerat Silvicultural Research Station of the Royal Forest Department, Thailand. Seedlings of H. odorata were planted in the nurse tree stands at a uniform spacing of 4 m × 4 m and in control plots (no nurse trees) in 1990. Stem numbers of some nurse trees were thinned by half in 1994. The stem diameter and height of all trees were measured annually until 1995 and again in 2007. The mean annual increment (MAI) in volume was estimated as 8.2–10.1 m 3 ha −1 year −1 for E. camaldulensis and 0.9–1.2 m 3 ha −1 year −1 for S. siamea, smaller than reported elsewhere. This suggests that the site properties were not suitable for them. The MAI of A. auriculiformis was 7.9–9.8 m 3 ha −1 year −1, within the reported range. Survival rates of H. odorata in the S. siamea stands and the control plots decreased rapidly during the first 2 years but then stayed constant from 1992. In contrast, survival rates of H. odorata in the E. camaldulensis and A. auriculiformis stands were initially high (>70%), but then decreased after 1995. Stem diameter, tree height, and stand basal area of H. odorata were large in both the S. siamea stands and the control plots from then. The growth of H. odorata was largest in the 2 m × 8 m S. siamea stands. In contrast, it was restricted in the E. camaldulensis and A. auriculiformis stands owing to strong shading by their canopies. Thinning by 50% tended to facilitate the growth of H. odorata temporarily in the E. camaldulensis and A. auriculiformis stands. The stand basal areas of nurse trees and of H. odorata showed a trade-off. These results suggest that the growth of H. odorata was maximized in the S. siamea stands. We assume, however, that the growth of H. odorata could be improved even in the E. camaldulensis and A. auriculiformis stands by frequent or heavy thinning.