Non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping for RhD negative women stratified into RHD gene deletion or variant groups: comparative accuracy using two blood collection tube types

• Published in: Pathology 2017-12, Vol.49 (7), p.757-764
• Main Authors: Hyland, Catherine A., Millard, Glenda M., O'Brien, Helen, Schoeman, Elizna M., Lopez, Genghis H., McGowan, Eunike C., Tremellen, Anne, Puddephatt, Rachel, Gaerty, Kirsten, Flower, Robert L., Hyett, Jonathan A., Gardener, Glenn J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: BCT; Blood Specimen Collection; Cohort Studies; EDTA; Exons - genetics; Female; Fetal Diseases - blood; Fetal Diseases - diagnosis; Fetal Diseases - genetics; Gene Deletion; Genotype; Haplotypes; Humans; Non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping; Pregnancy; Prenatal Diagnosis - methods; Rh-Hr Blood-Group System - genetics; RHD deleted haplotype; RHD variant; Rho(D) Immune Globulin; Sequence Deletion; tRAAD
• ISSN: 0031-3025; 1465-3931
• DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2017.08.010

Non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping in Australia to reduce anti-D usage will need to accommodate both prolonged sample transport times and a diverse population demographic harbouring a range of RHD blood group gene variants. We compared RHD genotyping accuracy using two blood sample collection tube types for RhD negative women stratified into deleted RHD gene haplotype and RHD gene variant cohorts. Maternal blood samples were collected into EDTA and cell-free (cf)DNA stabilising (BCT) tubes from two sites, one interstate. Automated DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were used to amplify RHD exons 5 and 10 and CCR5. Automated analysis flagged maternal RHD variants, which were classified by genotyping. Time between sample collection and processing ranged from 2.9 to 187.5 hours. cfDNA levels increased with time for EDTA (range 0.03–138 ng/μL) but not BCT samples (0.01–3.24 ng/μL). For the ‘deleted’ cohort (n=647) all fetal RHD genotyping outcomes were concordant, excepting for one unexplained false negative EDTA sample. Matched against cord RhD serology, negative predictive values using BCT and EDTA tubes were 100% and 99.6%, respectively. Positive predictive values were 99.7% for both types. Overall 37.2% of subjects carried an RhD negative baby. The ‘variant’ cohort (n=15) included one novel RHD and eight hybrid or African pseudogene variants. Review for fetal RHD specific signals, based on one exon, showed three EDTA samples discordant to BCT, attributed to high maternal cfDNA levels arising from prolonged transport times. For the deleted haplotype cohort, fetal RHD genotyping accuracy was comparable for samples collected in EDTA and BCT tubes despite higher cfDNA levels in the EDTA tubes. Capacity to predict fetal RHD genotype for maternal carriers of hybrid or pseudogene RHD variants requires stringent control of cfDNA levels. We conclude that fetal RHD genotyping is feasible in the Australian environment to avoid unnecessary anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis.