Freezing Eggs and Creating Patients: Moral Risks of Commercialized Fertility

There's no doubt that reproductive technologies can transform lives for the better. Infertile couples and single, lesbian, gay, intersex, and transgender people have the potential to form families in ways that would have been inconceivable years ago. Yet we are concerned about the widespread co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Hastings Center report 2017-11, Vol.47 (S3), p.S41-S45
Main Authors: Reis, Elizabeth, Reis‐Dennis, Samuel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bioethics
Commercialization
Cryogenic engineering
Eggs
Fertility
Gays & lesbians
Reproductive health
Reproductive technologies
Women
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:There's no doubt that reproductive technologies can transform lives for the better. Infertile couples and single, lesbian, gay, intersex, and transgender people have the potential to form families in ways that would have been inconceivable years ago. Yet we are concerned about the widespread commercialization of certain egg‐freezing programs, the messages they propagate about motherhood, the way they blur the line between care and experimentation, and the manipulative and exaggerated marketing that stretches the truth and inspires false hope in women of various ages. We argue that although reproductive technology, and egg freezing in particular, promise to improve women's care by offering more choices to achieve pregnancy and childbearing, they actually have the potential to be disempowering. First, commercial motives in the fertility industry distort women's medical deliberations, thereby restricting their autonomy; second, having the option to freeze their eggs can change the meaning of women's reproductive choices in a way that is limiting rather than liberating.
ISSN:0093-0334
1552-146X
DOI:10.1002/hast.794