Loading…

Differential adult survival at close seabird colonies: The importance of spatial foraging segregation and bycatch risk during the breeding season

Marine megafauna, including seabirds, are critically affected by fisheries bycatch. However, bycatch risk may differ on temporal and spatial scales due to the uneven distribution and effort of fleets operating different fishing gear, and to focal species distribution and foraging behavior. Scopoli&#...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global change biology 2018-03, Vol.24 (3), p.1279-1290
Main Authors: Genovart, Meritxell, Bécares, Juan, Igual, José‐Manuel, Martínez‐Abraín, Alejandro, Escandell, Raul, Sánchez, Antonio, Rodríguez, Beneharo, Arcos, José M., Oro, Daniel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4547-89369fe1de951c9b3dddffae5c58acb028bf7d6bc4dbdf661d9d55c917d2573d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4547-89369fe1de951c9b3dddffae5c58acb028bf7d6bc4dbdf661d9d55c917d2573d3
container_end_page 1290
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1279
container_title Global change biology
container_volume 24
creator Genovart, Meritxell
Bécares, Juan
Igual, José‐Manuel
Martínez‐Abraín, Alejandro
Escandell, Raul
Sánchez, Antonio
Rodríguez, Beneharo
Arcos, José M.
Oro, Daniel
description Marine megafauna, including seabirds, are critically affected by fisheries bycatch. However, bycatch risk may differ on temporal and spatial scales due to the uneven distribution and effort of fleets operating different fishing gear, and to focal species distribution and foraging behavior. Scopoli's shearwater Calonectris diomedea is a long‐lived seabird that experiences high bycatch rates in longline fisheries and strong population‐level impacts due to this type of anthropogenic mortality. Analyzing a long‐term dataset on individual monitoring, we compared adult survival (by means of multi‐event capture–recapture models) among three close predator‐free Mediterranean colonies of the species. Unexpectedly for a long‐lived organism, adult survival varied among colonies. We explored potential causes of this differential survival by (1) measuring egg volume as a proxy of food availability and parental condition; (2) building a specific longline bycatch risk map for the species; and (3) assessing the distribution patterns of breeding birds from the three study colonies via GPS tracking. Egg volume was very similar between colonies over time, suggesting that environmental variability related to habitat foraging suitability was not the main cause of differential survival. On the other hand, differences in foraging movements among individuals from the three colonies expose them to differential mortality risk, which likely influenced the observed differences in adult survival. The overlap of information obtained by the generation of specific bycatch risk maps, the quantification of population demographic parameters, and the foraging spatial analysis should inform managers about differential sensitivity to the anthropogenic impact at mesoscale level and guide decisions depending on the spatial configuration of local populations. The approach would apply and should be considered in any species where foraging distribution is colony‐specific and mortality risk varies spatially. Marine megafauna are critically affected by fisheries bycatch: here, we compared adult survival among three colonies of a seabird in the western Mediterranean. The overlap of information obtained by the generation of specific bycatch risk maps, the quantification of population demographic parameters and the foraging spatial analysis should inform managers about differential sensitivity to the anthropogenic impact at mesoscale level and guide decisions depending on the spatial configuration of lo
doi_str_mv 10.1111/gcb.13997
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1969935994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1969935994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4547-89369fe1de951c9b3dddffae5c58acb028bf7d6bc4dbdf661d9d55c917d2573d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1vFSEUhonR2A9d-AcMiRu7mBaGgRnc1atWkyZu6prwcZhS58IVZmruz_Afy-1UFyayOXDynCeHvAi9ouSc1nMxWnNOmZT9E3RMmeBN2w3i6eHOu4YSyo7QSSl3hBDWEvEcHbWS9gPru2P060PwHjLEOegJa7dMMy5Lvg_3h-eM7ZQK4ALahOywTVOKAco7fHMLOGx3Kc86WsDJ47LTDw6fsh5DHOvQmGGszRSxjg6bvdWzvcU5lO_YLfnAzFVjMoBbB3RJ8QV65vVU4OVjPUXfPn282Xxurr9efdlcXje2413fDJIJ6YE6kJxaaZhzznsN3PJBW0PawfjeCWM7Z5wXgjrpOLf1467lPXPsFL1dvbucfixQZrUNxcI06QhpKYpKISXjUnYVffMPepeWHOt2qiWk7dqB96JSZytlcyolg1e7HLY67xUl6pCTqjmph5wq-_rRuJgtuL_kn2AqcLECP8ME-_-b1NXm_ar8DQxgn6U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2002428576</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential adult survival at close seabird colonies: The importance of spatial foraging segregation and bycatch risk during the breeding season</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Genovart, Meritxell ; Bécares, Juan ; Igual, José‐Manuel ; Martínez‐Abraín, Alejandro ; Escandell, Raul ; Sánchez, Antonio ; Rodríguez, Beneharo ; Arcos, José M. ; Oro, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Genovart, Meritxell ; Bécares, Juan ; Igual, José‐Manuel ; Martínez‐Abraín, Alejandro ; Escandell, Raul ; Sánchez, Antonio ; Rodríguez, Beneharo ; Arcos, José M. ; Oro, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>Marine megafauna, including seabirds, are critically affected by fisheries bycatch. However, bycatch risk may differ on temporal and spatial scales due to the uneven distribution and effort of fleets operating different fishing gear, and to focal species distribution and foraging behavior. Scopoli's shearwater Calonectris diomedea is a long‐lived seabird that experiences high bycatch rates in longline fisheries and strong population‐level impacts due to this type of anthropogenic mortality. Analyzing a long‐term dataset on individual monitoring, we compared adult survival (by means of multi‐event capture–recapture models) among three close predator‐free Mediterranean colonies of the species. Unexpectedly for a long‐lived organism, adult survival varied among colonies. We explored potential causes of this differential survival by (1) measuring egg volume as a proxy of food availability and parental condition; (2) building a specific longline bycatch risk map for the species; and (3) assessing the distribution patterns of breeding birds from the three study colonies via GPS tracking. Egg volume was very similar between colonies over time, suggesting that environmental variability related to habitat foraging suitability was not the main cause of differential survival. On the other hand, differences in foraging movements among individuals from the three colonies expose them to differential mortality risk, which likely influenced the observed differences in adult survival. The overlap of information obtained by the generation of specific bycatch risk maps, the quantification of population demographic parameters, and the foraging spatial analysis should inform managers about differential sensitivity to the anthropogenic impact at mesoscale level and guide decisions depending on the spatial configuration of local populations. The approach would apply and should be considered in any species where foraging distribution is colony‐specific and mortality risk varies spatially. Marine megafauna are critically affected by fisheries bycatch: here, we compared adult survival among three colonies of a seabird in the western Mediterranean. The overlap of information obtained by the generation of specific bycatch risk maps, the quantification of population demographic parameters and the foraging spatial analysis should inform managers about differential sensitivity to the anthropogenic impact at mesoscale level and guide decisions depending on the spatial configuration of local populations. The approach would apply and should be considered in any species where foraging distribution is colony‐specific and mortality risk varies spatially.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-1013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13997</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29178374</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>adult survival ; Animal behavior ; Animal breeding ; Anthropogenic factors ; Aquatic birds ; Birds ; Breeding ; Breeding seasons ; Bycatch ; Calonectris diomedea ; Capture-recapture studies ; capture–recapture ; climatic index ; Colonies ; Demographics ; demography ; Distribution ; Distribution patterns ; Fisheries ; fisheries bycatch ; Fishing ; Fishing gear ; Food availability ; Food supply ; Foraging ; Foraging behavior ; Foraging habitats ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Human influences ; Local population ; Longline fishing ; Mediterranean ; Megafauna ; Mortality ; Ova ; Parameter sensitivity ; Predators ; remote tracking ; Risk ; risk map ; Seabirds ; Segregation ; Sensitivity analysis ; Spatial analysis ; Species ; Survival</subject><ispartof>Global change biology, 2018-03, Vol.24 (3), p.1279-1290</ispartof><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4547-89369fe1de951c9b3dddffae5c58acb028bf7d6bc4dbdf661d9d55c917d2573d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4547-89369fe1de951c9b3dddffae5c58acb028bf7d6bc4dbdf661d9d55c917d2573d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4782-3007 ; 0000-0003-2919-1288</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29178374$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Genovart, Meritxell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bécares, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Igual, José‐Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez‐Abraín, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escandell, Raul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Beneharo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arcos, José M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oro, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Differential adult survival at close seabird colonies: The importance of spatial foraging segregation and bycatch risk during the breeding season</title><title>Global change biology</title><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><description>Marine megafauna, including seabirds, are critically affected by fisheries bycatch. However, bycatch risk may differ on temporal and spatial scales due to the uneven distribution and effort of fleets operating different fishing gear, and to focal species distribution and foraging behavior. Scopoli's shearwater Calonectris diomedea is a long‐lived seabird that experiences high bycatch rates in longline fisheries and strong population‐level impacts due to this type of anthropogenic mortality. Analyzing a long‐term dataset on individual monitoring, we compared adult survival (by means of multi‐event capture–recapture models) among three close predator‐free Mediterranean colonies of the species. Unexpectedly for a long‐lived organism, adult survival varied among colonies. We explored potential causes of this differential survival by (1) measuring egg volume as a proxy of food availability and parental condition; (2) building a specific longline bycatch risk map for the species; and (3) assessing the distribution patterns of breeding birds from the three study colonies via GPS tracking. Egg volume was very similar between colonies over time, suggesting that environmental variability related to habitat foraging suitability was not the main cause of differential survival. On the other hand, differences in foraging movements among individuals from the three colonies expose them to differential mortality risk, which likely influenced the observed differences in adult survival. The overlap of information obtained by the generation of specific bycatch risk maps, the quantification of population demographic parameters, and the foraging spatial analysis should inform managers about differential sensitivity to the anthropogenic impact at mesoscale level and guide decisions depending on the spatial configuration of local populations. The approach would apply and should be considered in any species where foraging distribution is colony‐specific and mortality risk varies spatially. Marine megafauna are critically affected by fisheries bycatch: here, we compared adult survival among three colonies of a seabird in the western Mediterranean. The overlap of information obtained by the generation of specific bycatch risk maps, the quantification of population demographic parameters and the foraging spatial analysis should inform managers about differential sensitivity to the anthropogenic impact at mesoscale level and guide decisions depending on the spatial configuration of local populations. The approach would apply and should be considered in any species where foraging distribution is colony‐specific and mortality risk varies spatially.</description><subject>adult survival</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal breeding</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Breeding seasons</subject><subject>Bycatch</subject><subject>Calonectris diomedea</subject><subject>Capture-recapture studies</subject><subject>capture–recapture</subject><subject>climatic index</subject><subject>Colonies</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>demography</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Distribution patterns</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>fisheries bycatch</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Fishing gear</subject><subject>Food availability</subject><subject>Food supply</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Foraging habitats</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Local population</subject><subject>Longline fishing</subject><subject>Mediterranean</subject><subject>Megafauna</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Ova</subject><subject>Parameter sensitivity</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>remote tracking</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>risk map</subject><subject>Seabirds</subject><subject>Segregation</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Survival</subject><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1vFSEUhonR2A9d-AcMiRu7mBaGgRnc1atWkyZu6prwcZhS58IVZmruz_Afy-1UFyayOXDynCeHvAi9ouSc1nMxWnNOmZT9E3RMmeBN2w3i6eHOu4YSyo7QSSl3hBDWEvEcHbWS9gPru2P060PwHjLEOegJa7dMMy5Lvg_3h-eM7ZQK4ALahOywTVOKAco7fHMLOGx3Kc86WsDJ47LTDw6fsh5DHOvQmGGszRSxjg6bvdWzvcU5lO_YLfnAzFVjMoBbB3RJ8QV65vVU4OVjPUXfPn282Xxurr9efdlcXje2413fDJIJ6YE6kJxaaZhzznsN3PJBW0PawfjeCWM7Z5wXgjrpOLf1467lPXPsFL1dvbucfixQZrUNxcI06QhpKYpKISXjUnYVffMPepeWHOt2qiWk7dqB96JSZytlcyolg1e7HLY67xUl6pCTqjmph5wq-_rRuJgtuL_kn2AqcLECP8ME-_-b1NXm_ar8DQxgn6U</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Genovart, Meritxell</creator><creator>Bécares, Juan</creator><creator>Igual, José‐Manuel</creator><creator>Martínez‐Abraín, Alejandro</creator><creator>Escandell, Raul</creator><creator>Sánchez, Antonio</creator><creator>Rodríguez, Beneharo</creator><creator>Arcos, José M.</creator><creator>Oro, Daniel</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4782-3007</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2919-1288</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Differential adult survival at close seabird colonies: The importance of spatial foraging segregation and bycatch risk during the breeding season</title><author>Genovart, Meritxell ; Bécares, Juan ; Igual, José‐Manuel ; Martínez‐Abraín, Alejandro ; Escandell, Raul ; Sánchez, Antonio ; Rodríguez, Beneharo ; Arcos, José M. ; Oro, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4547-89369fe1de951c9b3dddffae5c58acb028bf7d6bc4dbdf661d9d55c917d2573d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>adult survival</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal breeding</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Breeding seasons</topic><topic>Bycatch</topic><topic>Calonectris diomedea</topic><topic>Capture-recapture studies</topic><topic>capture–recapture</topic><topic>climatic index</topic><topic>Colonies</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>demography</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Distribution patterns</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>fisheries bycatch</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Fishing gear</topic><topic>Food availability</topic><topic>Food supply</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Foraging habitats</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Local population</topic><topic>Longline fishing</topic><topic>Mediterranean</topic><topic>Megafauna</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Ova</topic><topic>Parameter sensitivity</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>remote tracking</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>risk map</topic><topic>Seabirds</topic><topic>Segregation</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Survival</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Genovart, Meritxell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bécares, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Igual, José‐Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez‐Abraín, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escandell, Raul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Beneharo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arcos, José M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oro, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Genovart, Meritxell</au><au>Bécares, Juan</au><au>Igual, José‐Manuel</au><au>Martínez‐Abraín, Alejandro</au><au>Escandell, Raul</au><au>Sánchez, Antonio</au><au>Rodríguez, Beneharo</au><au>Arcos, José M.</au><au>Oro, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential adult survival at close seabird colonies: The importance of spatial foraging segregation and bycatch risk during the breeding season</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1279</spage><epage>1290</epage><pages>1279-1290</pages><issn>1354-1013</issn><eissn>1365-2486</eissn><abstract>Marine megafauna, including seabirds, are critically affected by fisheries bycatch. However, bycatch risk may differ on temporal and spatial scales due to the uneven distribution and effort of fleets operating different fishing gear, and to focal species distribution and foraging behavior. Scopoli's shearwater Calonectris diomedea is a long‐lived seabird that experiences high bycatch rates in longline fisheries and strong population‐level impacts due to this type of anthropogenic mortality. Analyzing a long‐term dataset on individual monitoring, we compared adult survival (by means of multi‐event capture–recapture models) among three close predator‐free Mediterranean colonies of the species. Unexpectedly for a long‐lived organism, adult survival varied among colonies. We explored potential causes of this differential survival by (1) measuring egg volume as a proxy of food availability and parental condition; (2) building a specific longline bycatch risk map for the species; and (3) assessing the distribution patterns of breeding birds from the three study colonies via GPS tracking. Egg volume was very similar between colonies over time, suggesting that environmental variability related to habitat foraging suitability was not the main cause of differential survival. On the other hand, differences in foraging movements among individuals from the three colonies expose them to differential mortality risk, which likely influenced the observed differences in adult survival. The overlap of information obtained by the generation of specific bycatch risk maps, the quantification of population demographic parameters, and the foraging spatial analysis should inform managers about differential sensitivity to the anthropogenic impact at mesoscale level and guide decisions depending on the spatial configuration of local populations. The approach would apply and should be considered in any species where foraging distribution is colony‐specific and mortality risk varies spatially. Marine megafauna are critically affected by fisheries bycatch: here, we compared adult survival among three colonies of a seabird in the western Mediterranean. The overlap of information obtained by the generation of specific bycatch risk maps, the quantification of population demographic parameters and the foraging spatial analysis should inform managers about differential sensitivity to the anthropogenic impact at mesoscale level and guide decisions depending on the spatial configuration of local populations. The approach would apply and should be considered in any species where foraging distribution is colony‐specific and mortality risk varies spatially.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>29178374</pmid><doi>10.1111/gcb.13997</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4782-3007</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2919-1288</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1354-1013
ispartof Global change biology, 2018-03, Vol.24 (3), p.1279-1290
issn 1354-1013
1365-2486
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1969935994
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects adult survival
Animal behavior
Animal breeding
Anthropogenic factors
Aquatic birds
Birds
Breeding
Breeding seasons
Bycatch
Calonectris diomedea
Capture-recapture studies
capture–recapture
climatic index
Colonies
Demographics
demography
Distribution
Distribution patterns
Fisheries
fisheries bycatch
Fishing
Fishing gear
Food availability
Food supply
Foraging
Foraging behavior
Foraging habitats
Global positioning systems
GPS
Human influences
Local population
Longline fishing
Mediterranean
Megafauna
Mortality
Ova
Parameter sensitivity
Predators
remote tracking
Risk
risk map
Seabirds
Segregation
Sensitivity analysis
Spatial analysis
Species
Survival
title Differential adult survival at close seabird colonies: The importance of spatial foraging segregation and bycatch risk during the breeding season
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A08%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20adult%20survival%20at%20close%20seabird%20colonies:%20The%20importance%20of%20spatial%20foraging%20segregation%20and%20bycatch%20risk%20during%20the%20breeding%20season&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology&rft.au=Genovart,%20Meritxell&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1279&rft.epage=1290&rft.pages=1279-1290&rft.issn=1354-1013&rft.eissn=1365-2486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcb.13997&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1969935994%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4547-89369fe1de951c9b3dddffae5c58acb028bf7d6bc4dbdf661d9d55c917d2573d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2002428576&rft_id=info:pmid/29178374&rfr_iscdi=true