Loading…
Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature
With the successful uptake and inclusion of robotic systems in minimally invasive surgery and with the increasing application of robotic surgery (RS) in numerous surgical specialities worldwide, there is now a need to develop and enhance the technology further. One such improvement is the implementa...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of robotic surgery 2018-03, Vol.12 (1), p.11-25 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-8427507e8af0bef5cbdfc3bc2a889c8a2584381c1d17c40cbfe132109c6084ed3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-8427507e8af0bef5cbdfc3bc2a889c8a2584381c1d17c40cbfe132109c6084ed3 |
container_end_page | 25 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 11 |
container_title | Journal of robotic surgery |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Amirabdollahian, Farshid Livatino, Salvatore Vahedi, Behrad Gudipati, Radhika Sheen, Patrick Gawrie-Mohan, Shan Vasdev, Nikhil |
description | With the successful uptake and inclusion of robotic systems in minimally invasive surgery and with the increasing application of robotic surgery (RS) in numerous surgical specialities worldwide, there is now a need to develop and enhance the technology further. One such improvement is the implementation and amalgamation of haptic feedback technology into RS which will permit the operating surgeon on the console to receive haptic information on the type of tissue being operated on. The main advantage of using this is to allow the operating surgeon to feel and control the amount of force applied to different tissues during surgery thus minimising the risk of tissue damage due to both the direct and indirect effects of excessive tissue force or tension being applied during RS. We performed a two-rater systematic review to identify the latest developments and potential avenues of improving technology in the application and implementation of haptic feedback technology to the operating surgeon on the console during RS. This review provides a summary of technological enhancements in RS, considering different stages of work, from proof of concept to cadaver tissue testing, surgery in animals, and finally real implementation in surgical practice. We identify that at the time of this review, while there is a unanimous agreement regarding need for haptic and tactile feedback, there are no solutions or products available that address this need. There is a scope and need for new developments in haptic augmentation for robot-mediated surgery with the aim of improving patient care and robotic surgical technology further. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11701-017-0763-4 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1971705476</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2918715235</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-8427507e8af0bef5cbdfc3bc2a889c8a2584381c1d17c40cbfe132109c6084ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7xIwYuXaiZpm9SbLH7Bgh704iWk6VS79mNNWmX_vSldVxA8ZSDP-87wEHIM9BwoFRcOQFAIKYiQioSH0Q6ZgvQDi1LY3c6ST8iBc0tKYxFz2CcTlkKayERMycujxU9dYWMwaIvgTa-60gQFYp5p8x6UTWDbrO3CGvNSd5gHrrevaNeXgQ7c2nVY6yHgS0r8GhqqskOru97iIdkrdOXwaPPOyPPN9dP8Llw83N7PrxahibjsQhkxEVOBUhc0wyI2WV4YnhmmpUyN1CyWngMDOQgTUZMVCJwBTU1CZYQ5n5GzsXdl248eXafq0hmsKt1g2zsFqfCa4sgbmpHTP-iy7W3jr1NeiRQQMx57CkbK2NY5i4Va2bLWdq2AqkG8GsUrL14N4lXkMyeb5j7zrraJH9MeYCPg_FfjFf6u_r_1G8i0je8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918715235</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Amirabdollahian, Farshid ; Livatino, Salvatore ; Vahedi, Behrad ; Gudipati, Radhika ; Sheen, Patrick ; Gawrie-Mohan, Shan ; Vasdev, Nikhil</creator><creatorcontrib>Amirabdollahian, Farshid ; Livatino, Salvatore ; Vahedi, Behrad ; Gudipati, Radhika ; Sheen, Patrick ; Gawrie-Mohan, Shan ; Vasdev, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><description>With the successful uptake and inclusion of robotic systems in minimally invasive surgery and with the increasing application of robotic surgery (RS) in numerous surgical specialities worldwide, there is now a need to develop and enhance the technology further. One such improvement is the implementation and amalgamation of haptic feedback technology into RS which will permit the operating surgeon on the console to receive haptic information on the type of tissue being operated on. The main advantage of using this is to allow the operating surgeon to feel and control the amount of force applied to different tissues during surgery thus minimising the risk of tissue damage due to both the direct and indirect effects of excessive tissue force or tension being applied during RS. We performed a two-rater systematic review to identify the latest developments and potential avenues of improving technology in the application and implementation of haptic feedback technology to the operating surgeon on the console during RS. This review provides a summary of technological enhancements in RS, considering different stages of work, from proof of concept to cadaver tissue testing, surgery in animals, and finally real implementation in surgical practice. We identify that at the time of this review, while there is a unanimous agreement regarding need for haptic and tactile feedback, there are no solutions or products available that address this need. There is a scope and need for new developments in haptic augmentation for robot-mediated surgery with the aim of improving patient care and robotic surgical technology further.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-2483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-2491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0763-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29196867</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Consoles ; Feedback ; Haptics ; Joint replacement surgery ; Libraries ; Literature reviews ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Minimally Invasive Surgery ; Patients ; Review Article ; Robotic surgery ; Sensory feedback ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Systematic review ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Journal of robotic surgery, 2018-03, Vol.12 (1), p.11-25</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2017</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-8427507e8af0bef5cbdfc3bc2a889c8a2584381c1d17c40cbfe132109c6084ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-8427507e8af0bef5cbdfc3bc2a889c8a2584381c1d17c40cbfe132109c6084ed3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7007-2227</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29196867$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amirabdollahian, Farshid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livatino, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahedi, Behrad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gudipati, Radhika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheen, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gawrie-Mohan, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasdev, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature</title><title>Journal of robotic surgery</title><addtitle>J Robotic Surg</addtitle><addtitle>J Robot Surg</addtitle><description>With the successful uptake and inclusion of robotic systems in minimally invasive surgery and with the increasing application of robotic surgery (RS) in numerous surgical specialities worldwide, there is now a need to develop and enhance the technology further. One such improvement is the implementation and amalgamation of haptic feedback technology into RS which will permit the operating surgeon on the console to receive haptic information on the type of tissue being operated on. The main advantage of using this is to allow the operating surgeon to feel and control the amount of force applied to different tissues during surgery thus minimising the risk of tissue damage due to both the direct and indirect effects of excessive tissue force or tension being applied during RS. We performed a two-rater systematic review to identify the latest developments and potential avenues of improving technology in the application and implementation of haptic feedback technology to the operating surgeon on the console during RS. This review provides a summary of technological enhancements in RS, considering different stages of work, from proof of concept to cadaver tissue testing, surgery in animals, and finally real implementation in surgical practice. We identify that at the time of this review, while there is a unanimous agreement regarding need for haptic and tactile feedback, there are no solutions or products available that address this need. There is a scope and need for new developments in haptic augmentation for robot-mediated surgery with the aim of improving patient care and robotic surgical technology further.</description><subject>Consoles</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Haptics</subject><subject>Joint replacement surgery</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Sensory feedback</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1863-2483</issn><issn>1863-2491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7xIwYuXaiZpm9SbLH7Bgh704iWk6VS79mNNWmX_vSldVxA8ZSDP-87wEHIM9BwoFRcOQFAIKYiQioSH0Q6ZgvQDi1LY3c6ST8iBc0tKYxFz2CcTlkKayERMycujxU9dYWMwaIvgTa-60gQFYp5p8x6UTWDbrO3CGvNSd5gHrrevaNeXgQ7c2nVY6yHgS0r8GhqqskOru97iIdkrdOXwaPPOyPPN9dP8Llw83N7PrxahibjsQhkxEVOBUhc0wyI2WV4YnhmmpUyN1CyWngMDOQgTUZMVCJwBTU1CZYQ5n5GzsXdl248eXafq0hmsKt1g2zsFqfCa4sgbmpHTP-iy7W3jr1NeiRQQMx57CkbK2NY5i4Va2bLWdq2AqkG8GsUrL14N4lXkMyeb5j7zrraJH9MeYCPg_FfjFf6u_r_1G8i0je8</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Amirabdollahian, Farshid</creator><creator>Livatino, Salvatore</creator><creator>Vahedi, Behrad</creator><creator>Gudipati, Radhika</creator><creator>Sheen, Patrick</creator><creator>Gawrie-Mohan, Shan</creator><creator>Vasdev, Nikhil</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7007-2227</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature</title><author>Amirabdollahian, Farshid ; Livatino, Salvatore ; Vahedi, Behrad ; Gudipati, Radhika ; Sheen, Patrick ; Gawrie-Mohan, Shan ; Vasdev, Nikhil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-8427507e8af0bef5cbdfc3bc2a889c8a2584381c1d17c40cbfe132109c6084ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Consoles</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Haptics</topic><topic>Joint replacement surgery</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Sensory feedback</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amirabdollahian, Farshid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livatino, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahedi, Behrad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gudipati, Radhika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheen, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gawrie-Mohan, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasdev, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of robotic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amirabdollahian, Farshid</au><au>Livatino, Salvatore</au><au>Vahedi, Behrad</au><au>Gudipati, Radhika</au><au>Sheen, Patrick</au><au>Gawrie-Mohan, Shan</au><au>Vasdev, Nikhil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature</atitle><jtitle>Journal of robotic surgery</jtitle><stitle>J Robotic Surg</stitle><addtitle>J Robot Surg</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>11-25</pages><issn>1863-2483</issn><eissn>1863-2491</eissn><abstract>With the successful uptake and inclusion of robotic systems in minimally invasive surgery and with the increasing application of robotic surgery (RS) in numerous surgical specialities worldwide, there is now a need to develop and enhance the technology further. One such improvement is the implementation and amalgamation of haptic feedback technology into RS which will permit the operating surgeon on the console to receive haptic information on the type of tissue being operated on. The main advantage of using this is to allow the operating surgeon to feel and control the amount of force applied to different tissues during surgery thus minimising the risk of tissue damage due to both the direct and indirect effects of excessive tissue force or tension being applied during RS. We performed a two-rater systematic review to identify the latest developments and potential avenues of improving technology in the application and implementation of haptic feedback technology to the operating surgeon on the console during RS. This review provides a summary of technological enhancements in RS, considering different stages of work, from proof of concept to cadaver tissue testing, surgery in animals, and finally real implementation in surgical practice. We identify that at the time of this review, while there is a unanimous agreement regarding need for haptic and tactile feedback, there are no solutions or products available that address this need. There is a scope and need for new developments in haptic augmentation for robot-mediated surgery with the aim of improving patient care and robotic surgical technology further.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><pmid>29196867</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11701-017-0763-4</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7007-2227</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1863-2483 |
ispartof | Journal of robotic surgery, 2018-03, Vol.12 (1), p.11-25 |
issn | 1863-2483 1863-2491 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1971705476 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Consoles Feedback Haptics Joint replacement surgery Libraries Literature reviews Medical imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health Minimally Invasive Surgery Patients Review Article Robotic surgery Sensory feedback Surgeons Surgery Systematic review Urology |
title | Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T22%3A28%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20of%20haptic%20feedback%20in%20robot-mediated%20surgery:%20a%20systematic%20review%20of%20literature&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20robotic%20surgery&rft.au=Amirabdollahian,%20Farshid&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=11-25&rft.issn=1863-2483&rft.eissn=1863-2491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11701-017-0763-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2918715235%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-8427507e8af0bef5cbdfc3bc2a889c8a2584381c1d17c40cbfe132109c6084ed3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918715235&rft_id=info:pmid/29196867&rfr_iscdi=true |