Loading…

Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature

With the successful uptake and inclusion of robotic systems in minimally invasive surgery and with the increasing application of robotic surgery (RS) in numerous surgical specialities worldwide, there is now a need to develop and enhance the technology further. One such improvement is the implementa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of robotic surgery 2018-03, Vol.12 (1), p.11-25
Main Authors: Amirabdollahian, Farshid, Livatino, Salvatore, Vahedi, Behrad, Gudipati, Radhika, Sheen, Patrick, Gawrie-Mohan, Shan, Vasdev, Nikhil
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-8427507e8af0bef5cbdfc3bc2a889c8a2584381c1d17c40cbfe132109c6084ed3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-8427507e8af0bef5cbdfc3bc2a889c8a2584381c1d17c40cbfe132109c6084ed3
container_end_page 25
container_issue 1
container_start_page 11
container_title Journal of robotic surgery
container_volume 12
creator Amirabdollahian, Farshid
Livatino, Salvatore
Vahedi, Behrad
Gudipati, Radhika
Sheen, Patrick
Gawrie-Mohan, Shan
Vasdev, Nikhil
description With the successful uptake and inclusion of robotic systems in minimally invasive surgery and with the increasing application of robotic surgery (RS) in numerous surgical specialities worldwide, there is now a need to develop and enhance the technology further. One such improvement is the implementation and amalgamation of haptic feedback technology into RS which will permit the operating surgeon on the console to receive haptic information on the type of tissue being operated on. The main advantage of using this is to allow the operating surgeon to feel and control the amount of force applied to different tissues during surgery thus minimising the risk of tissue damage due to both the direct and indirect effects of excessive tissue force or tension being applied during RS. We performed a two-rater systematic review to identify the latest developments and potential avenues of improving technology in the application and implementation of haptic feedback technology to the operating surgeon on the console during RS. This review provides a summary of technological enhancements in RS, considering different stages of work, from proof of concept to cadaver tissue testing, surgery in animals, and finally real implementation in surgical practice. We identify that at the time of this review, while there is a unanimous agreement regarding need for haptic and tactile feedback, there are no solutions or products available that address this need. There is a scope and need for new developments in haptic augmentation for robot-mediated surgery with the aim of improving patient care and robotic surgical technology further.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11701-017-0763-4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1971705476</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2918715235</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-8427507e8af0bef5cbdfc3bc2a889c8a2584381c1d17c40cbfe132109c6084ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7xIwYuXaiZpm9SbLH7Bgh704iWk6VS79mNNWmX_vSldVxA8ZSDP-87wEHIM9BwoFRcOQFAIKYiQioSH0Q6ZgvQDi1LY3c6ST8iBc0tKYxFz2CcTlkKayERMycujxU9dYWMwaIvgTa-60gQFYp5p8x6UTWDbrO3CGvNSd5gHrrevaNeXgQ7c2nVY6yHgS0r8GhqqskOru97iIdkrdOXwaPPOyPPN9dP8Llw83N7PrxahibjsQhkxEVOBUhc0wyI2WV4YnhmmpUyN1CyWngMDOQgTUZMVCJwBTU1CZYQ5n5GzsXdl248eXafq0hmsKt1g2zsFqfCa4sgbmpHTP-iy7W3jr1NeiRQQMx57CkbK2NY5i4Va2bLWdq2AqkG8GsUrL14N4lXkMyeb5j7zrraJH9MeYCPg_FfjFf6u_r_1G8i0je8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918715235</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Amirabdollahian, Farshid ; Livatino, Salvatore ; Vahedi, Behrad ; Gudipati, Radhika ; Sheen, Patrick ; Gawrie-Mohan, Shan ; Vasdev, Nikhil</creator><creatorcontrib>Amirabdollahian, Farshid ; Livatino, Salvatore ; Vahedi, Behrad ; Gudipati, Radhika ; Sheen, Patrick ; Gawrie-Mohan, Shan ; Vasdev, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><description>With the successful uptake and inclusion of robotic systems in minimally invasive surgery and with the increasing application of robotic surgery (RS) in numerous surgical specialities worldwide, there is now a need to develop and enhance the technology further. One such improvement is the implementation and amalgamation of haptic feedback technology into RS which will permit the operating surgeon on the console to receive haptic information on the type of tissue being operated on. The main advantage of using this is to allow the operating surgeon to feel and control the amount of force applied to different tissues during surgery thus minimising the risk of tissue damage due to both the direct and indirect effects of excessive tissue force or tension being applied during RS. We performed a two-rater systematic review to identify the latest developments and potential avenues of improving technology in the application and implementation of haptic feedback technology to the operating surgeon on the console during RS. This review provides a summary of technological enhancements in RS, considering different stages of work, from proof of concept to cadaver tissue testing, surgery in animals, and finally real implementation in surgical practice. We identify that at the time of this review, while there is a unanimous agreement regarding need for haptic and tactile feedback, there are no solutions or products available that address this need. There is a scope and need for new developments in haptic augmentation for robot-mediated surgery with the aim of improving patient care and robotic surgical technology further.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-2483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-2491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0763-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29196867</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Consoles ; Feedback ; Haptics ; Joint replacement surgery ; Libraries ; Literature reviews ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Minimally Invasive Surgery ; Patients ; Review Article ; Robotic surgery ; Sensory feedback ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Systematic review ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Journal of robotic surgery, 2018-03, Vol.12 (1), p.11-25</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2017</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-8427507e8af0bef5cbdfc3bc2a889c8a2584381c1d17c40cbfe132109c6084ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-8427507e8af0bef5cbdfc3bc2a889c8a2584381c1d17c40cbfe132109c6084ed3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7007-2227</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29196867$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amirabdollahian, Farshid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livatino, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahedi, Behrad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gudipati, Radhika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheen, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gawrie-Mohan, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasdev, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature</title><title>Journal of robotic surgery</title><addtitle>J Robotic Surg</addtitle><addtitle>J Robot Surg</addtitle><description>With the successful uptake and inclusion of robotic systems in minimally invasive surgery and with the increasing application of robotic surgery (RS) in numerous surgical specialities worldwide, there is now a need to develop and enhance the technology further. One such improvement is the implementation and amalgamation of haptic feedback technology into RS which will permit the operating surgeon on the console to receive haptic information on the type of tissue being operated on. The main advantage of using this is to allow the operating surgeon to feel and control the amount of force applied to different tissues during surgery thus minimising the risk of tissue damage due to both the direct and indirect effects of excessive tissue force or tension being applied during RS. We performed a two-rater systematic review to identify the latest developments and potential avenues of improving technology in the application and implementation of haptic feedback technology to the operating surgeon on the console during RS. This review provides a summary of technological enhancements in RS, considering different stages of work, from proof of concept to cadaver tissue testing, surgery in animals, and finally real implementation in surgical practice. We identify that at the time of this review, while there is a unanimous agreement regarding need for haptic and tactile feedback, there are no solutions or products available that address this need. There is a scope and need for new developments in haptic augmentation for robot-mediated surgery with the aim of improving patient care and robotic surgical technology further.</description><subject>Consoles</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Haptics</subject><subject>Joint replacement surgery</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Sensory feedback</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1863-2483</issn><issn>1863-2491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7xIwYuXaiZpm9SbLH7Bgh704iWk6VS79mNNWmX_vSldVxA8ZSDP-87wEHIM9BwoFRcOQFAIKYiQioSH0Q6ZgvQDi1LY3c6ST8iBc0tKYxFz2CcTlkKayERMycujxU9dYWMwaIvgTa-60gQFYp5p8x6UTWDbrO3CGvNSd5gHrrevaNeXgQ7c2nVY6yHgS0r8GhqqskOru97iIdkrdOXwaPPOyPPN9dP8Llw83N7PrxahibjsQhkxEVOBUhc0wyI2WV4YnhmmpUyN1CyWngMDOQgTUZMVCJwBTU1CZYQ5n5GzsXdl248eXafq0hmsKt1g2zsFqfCa4sgbmpHTP-iy7W3jr1NeiRQQMx57CkbK2NY5i4Va2bLWdq2AqkG8GsUrL14N4lXkMyeb5j7zrraJH9MeYCPg_FfjFf6u_r_1G8i0je8</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Amirabdollahian, Farshid</creator><creator>Livatino, Salvatore</creator><creator>Vahedi, Behrad</creator><creator>Gudipati, Radhika</creator><creator>Sheen, Patrick</creator><creator>Gawrie-Mohan, Shan</creator><creator>Vasdev, Nikhil</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7007-2227</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature</title><author>Amirabdollahian, Farshid ; Livatino, Salvatore ; Vahedi, Behrad ; Gudipati, Radhika ; Sheen, Patrick ; Gawrie-Mohan, Shan ; Vasdev, Nikhil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-8427507e8af0bef5cbdfc3bc2a889c8a2584381c1d17c40cbfe132109c6084ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Consoles</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Haptics</topic><topic>Joint replacement surgery</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Sensory feedback</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amirabdollahian, Farshid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livatino, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vahedi, Behrad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gudipati, Radhika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheen, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gawrie-Mohan, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasdev, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of robotic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amirabdollahian, Farshid</au><au>Livatino, Salvatore</au><au>Vahedi, Behrad</au><au>Gudipati, Radhika</au><au>Sheen, Patrick</au><au>Gawrie-Mohan, Shan</au><au>Vasdev, Nikhil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature</atitle><jtitle>Journal of robotic surgery</jtitle><stitle>J Robotic Surg</stitle><addtitle>J Robot Surg</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>11-25</pages><issn>1863-2483</issn><eissn>1863-2491</eissn><abstract>With the successful uptake and inclusion of robotic systems in minimally invasive surgery and with the increasing application of robotic surgery (RS) in numerous surgical specialities worldwide, there is now a need to develop and enhance the technology further. One such improvement is the implementation and amalgamation of haptic feedback technology into RS which will permit the operating surgeon on the console to receive haptic information on the type of tissue being operated on. The main advantage of using this is to allow the operating surgeon to feel and control the amount of force applied to different tissues during surgery thus minimising the risk of tissue damage due to both the direct and indirect effects of excessive tissue force or tension being applied during RS. We performed a two-rater systematic review to identify the latest developments and potential avenues of improving technology in the application and implementation of haptic feedback technology to the operating surgeon on the console during RS. This review provides a summary of technological enhancements in RS, considering different stages of work, from proof of concept to cadaver tissue testing, surgery in animals, and finally real implementation in surgical practice. We identify that at the time of this review, while there is a unanimous agreement regarding need for haptic and tactile feedback, there are no solutions or products available that address this need. There is a scope and need for new developments in haptic augmentation for robot-mediated surgery with the aim of improving patient care and robotic surgical technology further.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><pmid>29196867</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11701-017-0763-4</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7007-2227</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1863-2483
ispartof Journal of robotic surgery, 2018-03, Vol.12 (1), p.11-25
issn 1863-2483
1863-2491
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1971705476
source Springer Nature
subjects Consoles
Feedback
Haptics
Joint replacement surgery
Libraries
Literature reviews
Medical imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Minimally Invasive Surgery
Patients
Review Article
Robotic surgery
Sensory feedback
Surgeons
Surgery
Systematic review
Urology
title Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T22%3A28%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20of%20haptic%20feedback%20in%20robot-mediated%20surgery:%20a%20systematic%20review%20of%20literature&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20robotic%20surgery&rft.au=Amirabdollahian,%20Farshid&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=11-25&rft.issn=1863-2483&rft.eissn=1863-2491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11701-017-0763-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2918715235%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-8427507e8af0bef5cbdfc3bc2a889c8a2584381c1d17c40cbfe132109c6084ed3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918715235&rft_id=info:pmid/29196867&rfr_iscdi=true