Loading…

Muscle fiber conduction velocity and EMG amplitude of the upper trapezius muscle in healthy subjects after low-level laser irradiation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study

Although low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is an important resource for the treatment of non-specific neck pain patients, the dose which presents the greatest therapeutic potential for the treatment of this pathology is still unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the immediate effect of LLLT on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Lasers in medical science 2018-05, Vol.33 (4), p.737-744
Main Authors: Sarilho de Mendonça, Fabiana, de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho, Paulo, Biasotto-Gonzalez, Daniela Aparecida, Calamita, Simone Aparecida Penimpedo, de Paula Gomes, Cid André Fidelis, Amorim, César Ferreira, Fumagalli, Marco Antônio, Politti, Fabiano
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Although low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is an important resource for the treatment of non-specific neck pain patients, the dose which presents the greatest therapeutic potential for the treatment of this pathology is still unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the immediate effect of LLLT on the muscle fiber conduction velocity (MFCV) and electromyographic activity (EMG) of the upper trapezius (UT) muscle in healthy individuals. A total of 20 healthy subjects were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Active LLLT (820 nm wavelength, 30 mW, energy total 18 J) or placebo LLLT (pLLLT) was delivered on the UT muscle. Each subject was subjected to a single session of active LLLT and pLLLT. Surface electromyography (sEMG) signal of the UT muscle was recorded during five different step contractions of shoulder elevation force (10–30% maximal voluntary contraction) pre- and post-LLLT irradiation. The values of MFCV and sEMG global amplitude (RMS G ) were used to calculate the effects of LLLT. The results showed no difference in the MFCV comparing the LLLT and pLLLT groups ( F  = 0.72 p  = 0.39, η p 2  = 0.004). However, a significant difference was observed in the RMS G between the LLLT and pLLLT ( F 1,2  = 16.66; P  
ISSN:0268-8921
1435-604X
DOI:10.1007/s10103-017-2404-6