Loading…
Residual pressure gradient across the implanted stent: An important factor of post-PCI physiological results
•Instantaneous wave-free ratio predicted–observed difference was 0.036±0.037.•Residual pressure gradient was an independent risk factor for the failed prediction.•There were two risk factors for the presence of residual pressure gradient. Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) has the potential to impr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of cardiology 2018-05, Vol.71 (5), p.458-463 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-fa09c9c2419669d48752a993026d76391a9b0ec6d8095a57e1698a0761776dfb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-fa09c9c2419669d48752a993026d76391a9b0ec6d8095a57e1698a0761776dfb3 |
container_end_page | 463 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 458 |
container_title | Journal of cardiology |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Kawase, Yoshiaki Kawasaki, Masanori Kikuchi, Jun Hirata, Tetsuo Okamoto, Syuuichi Tanigaki, Toru Omori, Hiroyuki Ota, Hideaki Okubo, Munenori Kamiya, Hiroki Hirakawa, Akihiro Matsuo, Hitoshi |
description | •Instantaneous wave-free ratio predicted–observed difference was 0.036±0.037.•Residual pressure gradient was an independent risk factor for the failed prediction.•There were two risk factors for the presence of residual pressure gradient.
Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) has the potential to improve the accuracy of the prediction of the physiological result of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of iFR to predict the final physiological results following PCI, and investigate the factors for failed prediction.
In 73 lesions, iFR pullback recordings were measured and comparisons were made between the predicted improvement following PCI and the observed result.
iFR predicted–observed difference was 0.036±0.037. Multivariate analysis showed residual iFR pressure gradient across the implanted stent (odds ratio, 2.329; 95% confidence interval, 1.408–3.853; p=0.0010) as an independent risk factor for error in iFR prediction.
iFR predicted–observed difference was 0.036±0.037. Residual in-stent iFR pressure gradient following PCI is the only independent risk factor for failed prediction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.10.022 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1973024863</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0914508717303179</els_id><sourcerecordid>1973024863</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-fa09c9c2419669d48752a993026d76391a9b0ec6d8095a57e1698a0761776dfb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFq3DAURUVpSCZpfqCLomU3njzJHskq3YQhTQOBhJCuhUZ6nsh4Rq4kB-bvI3fSLrsSXN134B5CPjNYMmDiql_2vbVLDkyWYAmcfyAL1kpRNbJuP5IFKNZUK2jlGTlPqQcQoFpxSs644lCDVAsyPGHybjIDHSOmNEWk22icx32mxsaQEs0vSP1uHMw-o6Mpl69v9Ho_ZyHmktLO2BwiDR0dQ8rV4_qOji-H5MMQtt4WdkFPQ06fyElnhoSX7-8F-fXj5nn9s7p_uL1bX99XtuFNrjoDyirLG6aEUK5p5YobpWrgwklRK2bUBtAK14JamZVEJlRrQAompXDdpr4gX4_cMYbfE6asdz5ZHMoEDFPSTMkCa1pRlyo_Vv9sjdjpMfqdiQfNQM-Wda9ny3q2PGfFcjn68s6fNjt0_07-ai2F78cClpWvHqNOtii16HxEm7UL_n_8N9x-jnc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1973024863</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Residual pressure gradient across the implanted stent: An important factor of post-PCI physiological results</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kawase, Yoshiaki ; Kawasaki, Masanori ; Kikuchi, Jun ; Hirata, Tetsuo ; Okamoto, Syuuichi ; Tanigaki, Toru ; Omori, Hiroyuki ; Ota, Hideaki ; Okubo, Munenori ; Kamiya, Hiroki ; Hirakawa, Akihiro ; Matsuo, Hitoshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Kawase, Yoshiaki ; Kawasaki, Masanori ; Kikuchi, Jun ; Hirata, Tetsuo ; Okamoto, Syuuichi ; Tanigaki, Toru ; Omori, Hiroyuki ; Ota, Hideaki ; Okubo, Munenori ; Kamiya, Hiroki ; Hirakawa, Akihiro ; Matsuo, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><description>•Instantaneous wave-free ratio predicted–observed difference was 0.036±0.037.•Residual pressure gradient was an independent risk factor for the failed prediction.•There were two risk factors for the presence of residual pressure gradient.
Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) has the potential to improve the accuracy of the prediction of the physiological result of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of iFR to predict the final physiological results following PCI, and investigate the factors for failed prediction.
In 73 lesions, iFR pullback recordings were measured and comparisons were made between the predicted improvement following PCI and the observed result.
iFR predicted–observed difference was 0.036±0.037. Multivariate analysis showed residual iFR pressure gradient across the implanted stent (odds ratio, 2.329; 95% confidence interval, 1.408–3.853; p=0.0010) as an independent risk factor for error in iFR prediction.
iFR predicted–observed difference was 0.036±0.037. Residual in-stent iFR pressure gradient following PCI is the only independent risk factor for failed prediction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0914-5087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1876-4738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.10.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29203079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Instantaneous wave-free ratio ; Residual pressure gradient ; Stent</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiology, 2018-05, Vol.71 (5), p.458-463</ispartof><rights>2017 Japanese College of Cardiology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-fa09c9c2419669d48752a993026d76391a9b0ec6d8095a57e1698a0761776dfb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-fa09c9c2419669d48752a993026d76391a9b0ec6d8095a57e1698a0761776dfb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8060-5274</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29203079$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kawase, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawasaki, Masanori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kikuchi, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirata, Tetsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamoto, Syuuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanigaki, Toru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omori, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ota, Hideaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okubo, Munenori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamiya, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirakawa, Akihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuo, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><title>Residual pressure gradient across the implanted stent: An important factor of post-PCI physiological results</title><title>Journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>J Cardiol</addtitle><description>•Instantaneous wave-free ratio predicted–observed difference was 0.036±0.037.•Residual pressure gradient was an independent risk factor for the failed prediction.•There were two risk factors for the presence of residual pressure gradient.
Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) has the potential to improve the accuracy of the prediction of the physiological result of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of iFR to predict the final physiological results following PCI, and investigate the factors for failed prediction.
In 73 lesions, iFR pullback recordings were measured and comparisons were made between the predicted improvement following PCI and the observed result.
iFR predicted–observed difference was 0.036±0.037. Multivariate analysis showed residual iFR pressure gradient across the implanted stent (odds ratio, 2.329; 95% confidence interval, 1.408–3.853; p=0.0010) as an independent risk factor for error in iFR prediction.
iFR predicted–observed difference was 0.036±0.037. Residual in-stent iFR pressure gradient following PCI is the only independent risk factor for failed prediction.</description><subject>Instantaneous wave-free ratio</subject><subject>Residual pressure gradient</subject><subject>Stent</subject><issn>0914-5087</issn><issn>1876-4738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFq3DAURUVpSCZpfqCLomU3njzJHskq3YQhTQOBhJCuhUZ6nsh4Rq4kB-bvI3fSLrsSXN134B5CPjNYMmDiql_2vbVLDkyWYAmcfyAL1kpRNbJuP5IFKNZUK2jlGTlPqQcQoFpxSs644lCDVAsyPGHybjIDHSOmNEWk22icx32mxsaQEs0vSP1uHMw-o6Mpl69v9Ho_ZyHmktLO2BwiDR0dQ8rV4_qOji-H5MMQtt4WdkFPQ06fyElnhoSX7-8F-fXj5nn9s7p_uL1bX99XtuFNrjoDyirLG6aEUK5p5YobpWrgwklRK2bUBtAK14JamZVEJlRrQAompXDdpr4gX4_cMYbfE6asdz5ZHMoEDFPSTMkCa1pRlyo_Vv9sjdjpMfqdiQfNQM-Wda9ny3q2PGfFcjn68s6fNjt0_07-ai2F78cClpWvHqNOtii16HxEm7UL_n_8N9x-jnc</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Kawase, Yoshiaki</creator><creator>Kawasaki, Masanori</creator><creator>Kikuchi, Jun</creator><creator>Hirata, Tetsuo</creator><creator>Okamoto, Syuuichi</creator><creator>Tanigaki, Toru</creator><creator>Omori, Hiroyuki</creator><creator>Ota, Hideaki</creator><creator>Okubo, Munenori</creator><creator>Kamiya, Hiroki</creator><creator>Hirakawa, Akihiro</creator><creator>Matsuo, Hitoshi</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8060-5274</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Residual pressure gradient across the implanted stent: An important factor of post-PCI physiological results</title><author>Kawase, Yoshiaki ; Kawasaki, Masanori ; Kikuchi, Jun ; Hirata, Tetsuo ; Okamoto, Syuuichi ; Tanigaki, Toru ; Omori, Hiroyuki ; Ota, Hideaki ; Okubo, Munenori ; Kamiya, Hiroki ; Hirakawa, Akihiro ; Matsuo, Hitoshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-fa09c9c2419669d48752a993026d76391a9b0ec6d8095a57e1698a0761776dfb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Instantaneous wave-free ratio</topic><topic>Residual pressure gradient</topic><topic>Stent</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kawase, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawasaki, Masanori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kikuchi, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirata, Tetsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamoto, Syuuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanigaki, Toru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omori, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ota, Hideaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okubo, Munenori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamiya, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirakawa, Akihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuo, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kawase, Yoshiaki</au><au>Kawasaki, Masanori</au><au>Kikuchi, Jun</au><au>Hirata, Tetsuo</au><au>Okamoto, Syuuichi</au><au>Tanigaki, Toru</au><au>Omori, Hiroyuki</au><au>Ota, Hideaki</au><au>Okubo, Munenori</au><au>Kamiya, Hiroki</au><au>Hirakawa, Akihiro</au><au>Matsuo, Hitoshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Residual pressure gradient across the implanted stent: An important factor of post-PCI physiological results</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>458</spage><epage>463</epage><pages>458-463</pages><issn>0914-5087</issn><eissn>1876-4738</eissn><abstract>•Instantaneous wave-free ratio predicted–observed difference was 0.036±0.037.•Residual pressure gradient was an independent risk factor for the failed prediction.•There were two risk factors for the presence of residual pressure gradient.
Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) has the potential to improve the accuracy of the prediction of the physiological result of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of iFR to predict the final physiological results following PCI, and investigate the factors for failed prediction.
In 73 lesions, iFR pullback recordings were measured and comparisons were made between the predicted improvement following PCI and the observed result.
iFR predicted–observed difference was 0.036±0.037. Multivariate analysis showed residual iFR pressure gradient across the implanted stent (odds ratio, 2.329; 95% confidence interval, 1.408–3.853; p=0.0010) as an independent risk factor for error in iFR prediction.
iFR predicted–observed difference was 0.036±0.037. Residual in-stent iFR pressure gradient following PCI is the only independent risk factor for failed prediction.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29203079</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.10.022</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8060-5274</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0914-5087 |
ispartof | Journal of cardiology, 2018-05, Vol.71 (5), p.458-463 |
issn | 0914-5087 1876-4738 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1973024863 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Instantaneous wave-free ratio Residual pressure gradient Stent |
title | Residual pressure gradient across the implanted stent: An important factor of post-PCI physiological results |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T05%3A07%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Residual%20pressure%20gradient%20across%20the%20implanted%20stent:%20An%20important%20factor%20of%20post-PCI%20physiological%20results&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Kawase,%20Yoshiaki&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=458&rft.epage=463&rft.pages=458-463&rft.issn=0914-5087&rft.eissn=1876-4738&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.10.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1973024863%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-fa09c9c2419669d48752a993026d76391a9b0ec6d8095a57e1698a0761776dfb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1973024863&rft_id=info:pmid/29203079&rfr_iscdi=true |