Role, ownership and presence of domestic animals in peri‐urban households of Kisumu, Kenya

• Published in: Zoonoses and public health 2018-02, Vol.65 (1), p.202-214
• Main Authors: Barnes, A. N., Mumma, J., Cumming, O.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural land; Animal husbandry; Animals; Communities; companion animals; Disease transmission; Diseases; Domestic animals; Economic factors; Eggs; Food; Health risks; Households; Income; livestock; Meat; Milk; Milk production; one health; Ownership; Pets; Population growth; poultry; Protein sources; Proteins; public health; Residential density; Surveying; Urban areas; Urban populations; Zoonoses
• ISSN: 1863-1959; 1863-2378
• DOI: 10.1111/zph.12429

Summary Low‐ and middle‐income countries are experiencing rapid urban population growth, particularly in peri‐urban informal settlements. In these urban areas, animal husbandry remains a valuable source of income and protein‐rich foods but may also present a risk of zoonotic disease threat. To date, there have been studies that have assessed the prevalence and nature of animal ownership in these communities. This cross‐sectional survey assessed the geographical, sociocultural and economic factors behind the presence, ownership and purpose of domestic animals in three informal peri‐urban communities of Kisumu, Kenya. A majority (n = 587) of the study households exhibited domestic animal presence in the living space yet only 32% of households reported animal ownership (n = 252). The purposes of ownership included: for meat/eggs (55%); for income, sale or trade (43%); for milk production (31%); and as companions/pets (31%). Among households that owned animals, 76% reported that at least one animal slept in the house at night. In multivariate logistic regression, the following factors were significantly associated with household animal ownership: ownership of agricultural land (OR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.12, 3.35), perceiving a strong community bond (OR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.25, 4.16), and household membership in a community group (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.04, 2.60). This research demonstrates the high prevalence of animal ownership in a low‐income and high‐density peri‐urban neighbourhood of an African city, which may facilitate zoonotic disease transmission. Further research should assess if and to what extent animal ownership in such communities is associated with disease risk.