Loading…

Fear of gaining weight: its validity as a visual analogue scale in anorexia nervosa

Despite fear of gaining weight (FGW) being a criterion for diagnosing anorexia nervosa (AN) there are no validated scales that assess it directly. The convergent validity of a visual analogue scale to assess FGW was tested. On admission to an inpatient unit, 114 females with AN were administered the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European eating disorders review 2006-03, Vol.14 (2), p.104-110
Main Author: Rushford, Nola
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-23487a00d23269456f33da03e036fd8a722a3b9caa2c341868f6514bc30384d43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-23487a00d23269456f33da03e036fd8a722a3b9caa2c341868f6514bc30384d43
container_end_page 110
container_issue 2
container_start_page 104
container_title European eating disorders review
container_volume 14
creator Rushford, Nola
description Despite fear of gaining weight (FGW) being a criterion for diagnosing anorexia nervosa (AN) there are no validated scales that assess it directly. The convergent validity of a visual analogue scale to assess FGW was tested. On admission to an inpatient unit, 114 females with AN were administered the FGW then, some days later, the Goldfarb Fear of Fat Scale (GFFS) and Eating Disorders Inventory (EDI). Concurrent validity for the FGW and GFFS was strong (r = 0.836), as was construct validity, their relationships to the EDI subscales paralleling each other. The strongest relationship for FGW was with drive for thinness (EDI‐DT) (r = 0.859). In 54 patients at discharge, predictive validity with EDI‐DT was strong (r = 0.771). Reliability was moderate (r = 0.636). With statistical validity established, the FGW could prove useful in integrating theory, clinical work and research in AN. Its direct assessment in this study has already highlighted its strong relationships to some maintaining and risk factors in AN. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/erv.682
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19737476</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19737476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-23487a00d23269456f33da03e036fd8a722a3b9caa2c341868f6514bc30384d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtLxDAQAOAiCj7xLwQPepBqkknT1JsuugqLiq56DLNtuka7rSbtPv69kYoHwdMMw8e8omif0RNGKT81bn4iFV-LthjNsphmUq1_5ymPBQPYjLa9f6M01BO1FT1eGXSkKckUbW3rKVkYO31tz4htPZljZQvbrgh6gmRufYcVwRqrZtoZ4nOsDLF1qDTOLC2SOsxuPO5GGyVW3uz9xJ3o6epyPLiOR3fDm8H5KM4hCdtwECpFSgsOXGYikSVAgRQMBVkWClPOESZZjshzEExJVcqEiUkOFJQoBOxEh33fD9d8dsa3emZ9bqoKa9N0XrMshVSkMsCDP_Ct6Vy4w2vOhFCcAg_oqEe5a7x3ptQfzs7QrTSj-vuzOlynw2eDPO7lwlZm9R_Tlw_PvY57bX1rlr8a3buWYb9Ev9wO9Vg8DC74-F4n8AVtQYa0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214482032</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fear of gaining weight: its validity as a visual analogue scale in anorexia nervosa</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Rushford, Nola</creator><creatorcontrib>Rushford, Nola</creatorcontrib><description>Despite fear of gaining weight (FGW) being a criterion for diagnosing anorexia nervosa (AN) there are no validated scales that assess it directly. The convergent validity of a visual analogue scale to assess FGW was tested. On admission to an inpatient unit, 114 females with AN were administered the FGW then, some days later, the Goldfarb Fear of Fat Scale (GFFS) and Eating Disorders Inventory (EDI). Concurrent validity for the FGW and GFFS was strong (r = 0.836), as was construct validity, their relationships to the EDI subscales paralleling each other. The strongest relationship for FGW was with drive for thinness (EDI‐DT) (r = 0.859). In 54 patients at discharge, predictive validity with EDI‐DT was strong (r = 0.771). Reliability was moderate (r = 0.636). With statistical validity established, the FGW could prove useful in integrating theory, clinical work and research in AN. Its direct assessment in this study has already highlighted its strong relationships to some maintaining and risk factors in AN. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1072-4133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0968</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/erv.682</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Anorexia ; anorexia nervosa ; diagnostic criterion ; Fear &amp; phobias ; fear of gaining weight ; Medical diagnosis ; Validity ; Weight</subject><ispartof>European eating disorders review, 2006-03, Vol.14 (2), p.104-110</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. and Eating Disorders Association</rights><rights>Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited Mar/Apr 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-23487a00d23269456f33da03e036fd8a722a3b9caa2c341868f6514bc30384d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-23487a00d23269456f33da03e036fd8a722a3b9caa2c341868f6514bc30384d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rushford, Nola</creatorcontrib><title>Fear of gaining weight: its validity as a visual analogue scale in anorexia nervosa</title><title>European eating disorders review</title><addtitle>Eur. Eat. Disorders Rev</addtitle><description>Despite fear of gaining weight (FGW) being a criterion for diagnosing anorexia nervosa (AN) there are no validated scales that assess it directly. The convergent validity of a visual analogue scale to assess FGW was tested. On admission to an inpatient unit, 114 females with AN were administered the FGW then, some days later, the Goldfarb Fear of Fat Scale (GFFS) and Eating Disorders Inventory (EDI). Concurrent validity for the FGW and GFFS was strong (r = 0.836), as was construct validity, their relationships to the EDI subscales paralleling each other. The strongest relationship for FGW was with drive for thinness (EDI‐DT) (r = 0.859). In 54 patients at discharge, predictive validity with EDI‐DT was strong (r = 0.771). Reliability was moderate (r = 0.636). With statistical validity established, the FGW could prove useful in integrating theory, clinical work and research in AN. Its direct assessment in this study has already highlighted its strong relationships to some maintaining and risk factors in AN. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.</description><subject>Anorexia</subject><subject>anorexia nervosa</subject><subject>diagnostic criterion</subject><subject>Fear &amp; phobias</subject><subject>fear of gaining weight</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Weight</subject><issn>1072-4133</issn><issn>1099-0968</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10EtLxDAQAOAiCj7xLwQPepBqkknT1JsuugqLiq56DLNtuka7rSbtPv69kYoHwdMMw8e8omif0RNGKT81bn4iFV-LthjNsphmUq1_5ymPBQPYjLa9f6M01BO1FT1eGXSkKckUbW3rKVkYO31tz4htPZljZQvbrgh6gmRufYcVwRqrZtoZ4nOsDLF1qDTOLC2SOsxuPO5GGyVW3uz9xJ3o6epyPLiOR3fDm8H5KM4hCdtwECpFSgsOXGYikSVAgRQMBVkWClPOESZZjshzEExJVcqEiUkOFJQoBOxEh33fD9d8dsa3emZ9bqoKa9N0XrMshVSkMsCDP_Ct6Vy4w2vOhFCcAg_oqEe5a7x3ptQfzs7QrTSj-vuzOlynw2eDPO7lwlZm9R_Tlw_PvY57bX1rlr8a3buWYb9Ev9wO9Vg8DC74-F4n8AVtQYa0</recordid><startdate>200603</startdate><enddate>200603</enddate><creator>Rushford, Nola</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons, Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200603</creationdate><title>Fear of gaining weight: its validity as a visual analogue scale in anorexia nervosa</title><author>Rushford, Nola</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-23487a00d23269456f33da03e036fd8a722a3b9caa2c341868f6514bc30384d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Anorexia</topic><topic>anorexia nervosa</topic><topic>diagnostic criterion</topic><topic>Fear &amp; phobias</topic><topic>fear of gaining weight</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rushford, Nola</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>European eating disorders review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rushford, Nola</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fear of gaining weight: its validity as a visual analogue scale in anorexia nervosa</atitle><jtitle>European eating disorders review</jtitle><addtitle>Eur. Eat. Disorders Rev</addtitle><date>2006-03</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>104</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>104-110</pages><issn>1072-4133</issn><eissn>1099-0968</eissn><abstract>Despite fear of gaining weight (FGW) being a criterion for diagnosing anorexia nervosa (AN) there are no validated scales that assess it directly. The convergent validity of a visual analogue scale to assess FGW was tested. On admission to an inpatient unit, 114 females with AN were administered the FGW then, some days later, the Goldfarb Fear of Fat Scale (GFFS) and Eating Disorders Inventory (EDI). Concurrent validity for the FGW and GFFS was strong (r = 0.836), as was construct validity, their relationships to the EDI subscales paralleling each other. The strongest relationship for FGW was with drive for thinness (EDI‐DT) (r = 0.859). In 54 patients at discharge, predictive validity with EDI‐DT was strong (r = 0.771). Reliability was moderate (r = 0.636). With statistical validity established, the FGW could prove useful in integrating theory, clinical work and research in AN. Its direct assessment in this study has already highlighted its strong relationships to some maintaining and risk factors in AN. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/erv.682</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1072-4133
ispartof European eating disorders review, 2006-03, Vol.14 (2), p.104-110
issn 1072-4133
1099-0968
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19737476
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Anorexia
anorexia nervosa
diagnostic criterion
Fear & phobias
fear of gaining weight
Medical diagnosis
Validity
Weight
title Fear of gaining weight: its validity as a visual analogue scale in anorexia nervosa
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T01%3A27%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fear%20of%20gaining%20weight:%20its%20validity%20as%20a%20visual%20analogue%20scale%20in%20anorexia%20nervosa&rft.jtitle=European%20eating%20disorders%20review&rft.au=Rushford,%20Nola&rft.date=2006-03&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=104&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=104-110&rft.issn=1072-4133&rft.eissn=1099-0968&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/erv.682&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19737476%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-23487a00d23269456f33da03e036fd8a722a3b9caa2c341868f6514bc30384d43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214482032&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true