Loading…

Abundance anomalies of aromatic biomarkers in the Permian–Triassic boundary section at Meishan, China — Evidence of end-Permian terrestrial ecosystem collapse

Several aromatic biomarkers detected in solvent extracts and kerogen pyrolysates from samples of the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the Permian–Triassic boundary at Meishan, China, show distinctive relative-abundance anomalies that may be related to the end-Permian biotic crisis on l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Palaeogeography, palaeoclimatology, palaeoecology palaeoclimatology, palaeoecology, 2007-08, Vol.252 (1), p.291-303
Main Authors: Wang, Chunjiang, Visscher, Henk
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Several aromatic biomarkers detected in solvent extracts and kerogen pyrolysates from samples of the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the Permian–Triassic boundary at Meishan, China, show distinctive relative-abundance anomalies that may be related to the end-Permian biotic crisis on land. Enrichment of dibenzofuran homologues across the Permian–Triassic boundary may corroborate the concept of excessive soil erosion following loss of rooted vegetation. Enrichment of alkylphenol entities occurs just below the main marine mass extinction horizon and prior to the characteristic end-Permian δ 13C decline. The alkylphenols were probably derived from lignin and may provide a molecular record of dieback of woody vegetation. Highly decreased relative abundances of dibenzothiophenes could be indicative of excessive supply of Fe 2+. It is suggested that Fe 2+ was land-derived and may have originated from soils. In addition to the Permian–Triassic boundary interval, biomarker abundance anomalies also occur around the Wuchiapingian–Changhsingian boundary in the basal part of the Meishan section.
ISSN:0031-0182
1872-616X
DOI:10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.11.048