Vocalizations of male bearded seals, Erignathus barbatus: classification and geographical variation

• Published in: Animal behaviour 2007-05, Vol.73 (5), p.747-762
• Main Authors: Risch, Denise, Clark, Christopher W., Corkeron, Peter J., Elepfandt, Andreas, Kovacs, Kit M., Lydersen, Christian, Stirling, Ian, Van Parijs, Sofie M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: acoustic behaviour; Animal behavior; Animal communication; Animal ethology; bearded seal; Biogeography; Biological and medical sciences; Biological variation; Classification; Comparative studies; Erignathus barbatus; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; geographical variation; Marine; Marine mammals; mating signal; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; trill; vocal repertoire
• ISSN: 0003-3472; 1095-8282
• DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.06.012

Comparative studies of vocal repertoires over the geographical range of a species can improve our understanding of the function and evolution of animal vocalizations. They may also help to elucidate relationships between populations, where genetic studies are missing or difficult to perform. We recorded male bearded seal vocalizations from four sites throughout their Arctic distribution. We measured 16 parameters for each vocalization and examined variability using classification tree analyses. There were four major call categories: trill, ascent, sweep and moan. Trills divided further into three subcategories: trills with ascent/plume, long trills and short trills. Not all call categories were present at all sites: the ascent occurred only in Alaska and western Canada, the sweep occurred only in Svalbard and in the High Canadian Arctic, and the trill with ascent/plume occurred at all sites except Svalbard. Geographical differences between sites were apparent in repertoire size as well as in vocal structure. Furthermore, an east–west gradient in structural similarities between call types was apparent. The vocal repertoire of bearded seals seemed to be relatively stable; for example, over a period of 16 years no calls were lost or added to the Alaskan repertoire. The most likely explanation for the observed vocal differences between sites is the geographical isolation of populations by physical distance. Other factors, such as varying ecological influences (e.g. adaptation to varying ice habitats) or sexual selection, may also contribute to vocal variability and result in the observed geographical variation.