Loading…

Leave it to the states

Evans shares his view on the proposal to put a national lid of $250,000 on noneconomic malpractice judgments. He opines that such amount may be too small for some cases and injured parties may be denied an appropriate remedy at law; moreover, insurance regulation is a proper function of the states,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Consumers' research magazine 2003-06, Vol.86 (6), p.5
Main Author: Evans, M. Stanton
Format: Magazinearticle
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Evans shares his view on the proposal to put a national lid of $250,000 on noneconomic malpractice judgments. He opines that such amount may be too small for some cases and injured parties may be denied an appropriate remedy at law; moreover, insurance regulation is a proper function of the states, and not the federal government.
ISSN:0095-2222