Managing erosion and water quality in agricultural watersheds by small detention ponds

• Published in: Agriculture, ecosystems & environment ecosystems & environment, 2005-11, Vol.110 (3), p.132-142
• Main Authors: Fiener, P., Auerswald, K., Weigand, S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: agricultural watersheds; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions; Biological and medical sciences; Detention ponds; erosion control; farm ponds; Flood control; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Nutrient enrichment; Pesticide; sediment deposition; Sedimentation; Soil and water pollution; Soil science; stormwater management; water quality
• ISSN: 0167-8809; 1873-2305
• DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.03.012

Terrace-contouring systems with on-site water detention cannot be installed in areas of complex topography, small parceling and multi-blade moldboard plow use. However, field borders at the downslope end may be raised at the deepest part where runoff overtops to create detention ponds, which can be drained by subsurface tile outlets and act similar to terrace-contouring systems. Four of such detention ponds were monitored over 8 years. Monitored effects included the prevention of linear erosion down slope, the sediment trapping from upslope, the enrichment of major nutrients in the trapped and delivered sediments, the amount of runoff retained temporarily, the amount of runoff reduced by infiltration, the decrease in peak runoff rate and the decrease in peak concentrations of agrochemicals due to the mixing of different volumes of water within the detention ponds. The detention ponds had a volume of 30–260 m 3 ha −1 and trapped 54–85% of the incoming sediment, which was insignificantly to slightly depleted (5–25%) in organic carbon, phosphorus, nitrogen and clay as compared to the eroding topsoil, while the delivered sediment was strongly enriched (+70–270%) but part of this enrichment already resulted from the enrichment of soil loss. The detention ponds temporarily stored 200–500 m 3 of runoff. A failure was never experienced. Due to the siltation of the pond bottom, the short filled time (1–5 days) and the small water covered area, infiltration and evaporation reduced runoff by less than 10% for large events. Peak runoff during heavy rains was lowered by a factor of three. Peak concentrations of agrochemicals (Terbutylazin) were lowered by a factor of two. The detention ponds created by raising the downslope field borders at the pour point efficiently reduced adverse erosion effects downslope the eroding site. They are cheap and can easily be created with on-farm machinery. Their efficiency is improved where they are combined with an on-site erosion control like mulch tillage because sediment and runoff input are reduced. Ponds had to be dredged only after the first year when on-site erosion control was not fully effective.