Patterns of plant invasion along an environmental stress gradient

• Published in: Journal of vegetation science 2006-02, Vol.17 (1), p.47-56
• Main Authors: MacDougall, A. S, Boucher, J, Turkington, R, Bradfield, G. E
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: abiotic stress; Biodiversity; botanical composition; British Columbia; canopy gaps; Competition; Conservation; correlation; Ecological invasion; endangered species; Facilitation; Grasses; indigenous species; Introduced species; invasive species; Native species; Oak savanna; Perennials; plant communities; plant competition; Plants; Quercus garryana; Refuge; s; Savanna soils; Savannas; Soil depth; species diversity; topography; Vegetation canopies; weeds
• ISSN: 1100-9233; 1654-1103; 1104-7402
• DOI: 10.1658/1100-9233(2006)017[0047:POPIAA]2.0.CO;2

Question: Do stressful environments facilitate plant invasion by providing refuges from intense above-ground competition associated with productive areas, or prevent it by favouring locally adapted native species? Location: An invaded and fragmented oak savanna ecosystem structured along a landscape-level stress gradient associated with soil depth, elevation, and canopy openness. Methods: Vegetation and environmental data were collected from 184 plots in seven savanna remnants along the gradient. Using multivariate (CCA) and post-hoc regression analyses, we determined the relationship between environment and the richness and abundance of invasives. Results: 46 of 119 species were naturalized exotics. CCA indicated the importance of environmental variation (mostly soil depth) for community structure but not for invasion; invasive species richness was similar in all areas. However, the abundance of invasives and their impacts on native diversity appear to increase significantly in less stressful habitats. Deeper soils had lower evenness and significantly fewer native species. This result was associated with dominance by exotic perennial grasses and large increases in vegetation height, suggesting strong above-ground competition. Conclusions: Low-stress environments were not more invasible per se but appear to be more susceptible to invasion by species with strong competitive impacts. The causes of decreasing exotic impact with decreasing soil depth may reflect shifts in competitive intensity or an increased importance of stress tolerance, both of which may favour natives. Alternatively, this ecosystem may simply lack high-impact invaders capable of dominating shallow soils. Conservation challenges are twofold for this endangered plant community: controlling invasives that currently dominate deeper-soils and accounting for a diverse pool of invaders that proliferate when the current dominants are removed. Nomenclature: Douglas et al. 2001.