Loading…

Prognostic effect of cytoreductive nephrectomy in synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a comparative study using inverse probability of treatment weighting

Purpose To test the hypothesis that cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) improves overall survival (OS) of patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), who subsequently receive targeted therapies (TT). Methods We identified 261 patients who received TT for synchronous mRCC with or wit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World journal of urology 2018-03, Vol.36 (3), p.417-425
Main Authors: Klatte, Tobias, Fife, Kate, Welsh, Sarah J., Sachdeva, Manavi, Armitage, James N., ‘Aho, Tevita, Riddick, Antony C., Matakidou, Athena, Eisen, Tim, Stewart, Grant D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-67f0f9cb69de9e3f6f1a4722e5a5db25c07ae4e18137b12c78327e1346227f3c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-67f0f9cb69de9e3f6f1a4722e5a5db25c07ae4e18137b12c78327e1346227f3c3
container_end_page 425
container_issue 3
container_start_page 417
container_title World journal of urology
container_volume 36
creator Klatte, Tobias
Fife, Kate
Welsh, Sarah J.
Sachdeva, Manavi
Armitage, James N.
‘Aho, Tevita
Riddick, Antony C.
Matakidou, Athena
Eisen, Tim
Stewart, Grant D.
description Purpose To test the hypothesis that cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) improves overall survival (OS) of patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), who subsequently receive targeted therapies (TT). Methods We identified 261 patients who received TT for synchronous mRCC with or without prior CN. To achieve balance in baseline characteristics between groups, we used the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. We conducted OS analyses, including IPTW-adjusted Kaplan–Meier curves, Cox regression models, interaction term, and landmark and sensitivity analyses. Results Of the 261 patients, 97 (37.2%) received CN and 164 (62.8%) did not. IPTW-adjusted analyses showed a statistically significant OS benefit for patients treated with CN (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.46–0.83, P  = 0.0015). While there was no statistically significant difference in OS at 3 months ( P  = 0.97), 6 months ( P  = 0.67), and 12 months ( P  = 0.11) from diagnosis, a benefit for the CN group was noted at 18 months ( P  = 0.005) and 24 months ( P  = 0.004). On interaction term analyses, the beneficial effect of CN increased with better performance status ( P  = 0.06), in women ( P  = 0.03), and in patients with thrombocytosis ( P  = 0.01). Conclusions IPTW-adjusted analysis of our patient cohort suggests that CN improves OS of patients with synchronous mRCC treated with TT. On the whole, the survival difference appears after 12 months. Specific subgroups may particularly benefit from CN, and these subgroups warrant further investigation in prospective trials.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00345-017-2154-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1978733266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1978733266</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-67f0f9cb69de9e3f6f1a4722e5a5db25c07ae4e18137b12c78327e1346227f3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCA7BBlth0E_BvnLBDFQWkSrCAteU443td3dgX2ynN8_CiOKQghMRmZjHfOePxQeg5Ja8oIep1JoQL2RCqGkalaO4eoB0VnDedYu1DtCOKiUb0HT9DT3K-IRVsiXyMzljPZEsY2aEfn1Pch5iLtxicA1twdNguJSYYZ1v8LeAAp0Oqkzgt2Aecl2APKYY4ZzxBMbmYVZ0gmCO2cKzFJOtDnMwbbLCN08kk88spl3lc8Jx92FenW0gZ8CnFwQz-6Muyri4JTJkgFPwd_P5QKvoUPXLmmOHZfT9HX6_efbn80Fx_ev_x8u11YwWVpWmVI663Q9uP0AN3raNGKMZAGjkOTFqiDAigHeVqoMyqjjMFlIuWMeW45efoYvOtT_o2Qy568nk9yASox2raq05xztq2oi__QW_inOoHbBQVvZR9pehG2RRzTuD0KfnJpEVTotcE9ZagrsHoNUF9VzUv7p3nYYLxj-J3ZBVgG5DrKOwh_bX6v64_AQq0q1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1978149559</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prognostic effect of cytoreductive nephrectomy in synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a comparative study using inverse probability of treatment weighting</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Klatte, Tobias ; Fife, Kate ; Welsh, Sarah J. ; Sachdeva, Manavi ; Armitage, James N. ; ‘Aho, Tevita ; Riddick, Antony C. ; Matakidou, Athena ; Eisen, Tim ; Stewart, Grant D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Klatte, Tobias ; Fife, Kate ; Welsh, Sarah J. ; Sachdeva, Manavi ; Armitage, James N. ; ‘Aho, Tevita ; Riddick, Antony C. ; Matakidou, Athena ; Eisen, Tim ; Stewart, Grant D.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To test the hypothesis that cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) improves overall survival (OS) of patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), who subsequently receive targeted therapies (TT). Methods We identified 261 patients who received TT for synchronous mRCC with or without prior CN. To achieve balance in baseline characteristics between groups, we used the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. We conducted OS analyses, including IPTW-adjusted Kaplan–Meier curves, Cox regression models, interaction term, and landmark and sensitivity analyses. Results Of the 261 patients, 97 (37.2%) received CN and 164 (62.8%) did not. IPTW-adjusted analyses showed a statistically significant OS benefit for patients treated with CN (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.46–0.83, P  = 0.0015). While there was no statistically significant difference in OS at 3 months ( P  = 0.97), 6 months ( P  = 0.67), and 12 months ( P  = 0.11) from diagnosis, a benefit for the CN group was noted at 18 months ( P  = 0.005) and 24 months ( P  = 0.004). On interaction term analyses, the beneficial effect of CN increased with better performance status ( P  = 0.06), in women ( P  = 0.03), and in patients with thrombocytosis ( P  = 0.01). Conclusions IPTW-adjusted analysis of our patient cohort suggests that CN improves OS of patients with synchronous mRCC treated with TT. On the whole, the survival difference appears after 12 months. Specific subgroups may particularly benefit from CN, and these subgroups warrant further investigation in prospective trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0724-4983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-8726</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00345-017-2154-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29256020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Kidney cancer ; Kidney transplantation ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Nephrectomy ; Nephrology ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Regression analysis ; Renal cell carcinoma ; Sensitivity analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Targeted cancer therapy ; Thrombocytosis ; Urology</subject><ispartof>World journal of urology, 2018-03, Vol.36 (3), p.417-425</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017</rights><rights>World Journal of Urology is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-67f0f9cb69de9e3f6f1a4722e5a5db25c07ae4e18137b12c78327e1346227f3c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-67f0f9cb69de9e3f6f1a4722e5a5db25c07ae4e18137b12c78327e1346227f3c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4392-6861</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29256020$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klatte, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fife, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welsh, Sarah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sachdeva, Manavi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armitage, James N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>‘Aho, Tevita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riddick, Antony C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matakidou, Athena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisen, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Grant D.</creatorcontrib><title>Prognostic effect of cytoreductive nephrectomy in synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a comparative study using inverse probability of treatment weighting</title><title>World journal of urology</title><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><description>Purpose To test the hypothesis that cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) improves overall survival (OS) of patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), who subsequently receive targeted therapies (TT). Methods We identified 261 patients who received TT for synchronous mRCC with or without prior CN. To achieve balance in baseline characteristics between groups, we used the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. We conducted OS analyses, including IPTW-adjusted Kaplan–Meier curves, Cox regression models, interaction term, and landmark and sensitivity analyses. Results Of the 261 patients, 97 (37.2%) received CN and 164 (62.8%) did not. IPTW-adjusted analyses showed a statistically significant OS benefit for patients treated with CN (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.46–0.83, P  = 0.0015). While there was no statistically significant difference in OS at 3 months ( P  = 0.97), 6 months ( P  = 0.67), and 12 months ( P  = 0.11) from diagnosis, a benefit for the CN group was noted at 18 months ( P  = 0.005) and 24 months ( P  = 0.004). On interaction term analyses, the beneficial effect of CN increased with better performance status ( P  = 0.06), in women ( P  = 0.03), and in patients with thrombocytosis ( P  = 0.01). Conclusions IPTW-adjusted analysis of our patient cohort suggests that CN improves OS of patients with synchronous mRCC treated with TT. On the whole, the survival difference appears after 12 months. Specific subgroups may particularly benefit from CN, and these subgroups warrant further investigation in prospective trials.</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Kidney cancer</subject><subject>Kidney transplantation</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Nephrectomy</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Renal cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Targeted cancer therapy</subject><subject>Thrombocytosis</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0724-4983</issn><issn>1433-8726</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCA7BBlth0E_BvnLBDFQWkSrCAteU443td3dgX2ynN8_CiOKQghMRmZjHfOePxQeg5Ja8oIep1JoQL2RCqGkalaO4eoB0VnDedYu1DtCOKiUb0HT9DT3K-IRVsiXyMzljPZEsY2aEfn1Pch5iLtxicA1twdNguJSYYZ1v8LeAAp0Oqkzgt2Aecl2APKYY4ZzxBMbmYVZ0gmCO2cKzFJOtDnMwbbLCN08kk88spl3lc8Jx92FenW0gZ8CnFwQz-6Muyri4JTJkgFPwd_P5QKvoUPXLmmOHZfT9HX6_efbn80Fx_ev_x8u11YwWVpWmVI663Q9uP0AN3raNGKMZAGjkOTFqiDAigHeVqoMyqjjMFlIuWMeW45efoYvOtT_o2Qy568nk9yASox2raq05xztq2oi__QW_inOoHbBQVvZR9pehG2RRzTuD0KfnJpEVTotcE9ZagrsHoNUF9VzUv7p3nYYLxj-J3ZBVgG5DrKOwh_bX6v64_AQq0q1g</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Klatte, Tobias</creator><creator>Fife, Kate</creator><creator>Welsh, Sarah J.</creator><creator>Sachdeva, Manavi</creator><creator>Armitage, James N.</creator><creator>‘Aho, Tevita</creator><creator>Riddick, Antony C.</creator><creator>Matakidou, Athena</creator><creator>Eisen, Tim</creator><creator>Stewart, Grant D.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4392-6861</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Prognostic effect of cytoreductive nephrectomy in synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a comparative study using inverse probability of treatment weighting</title><author>Klatte, Tobias ; Fife, Kate ; Welsh, Sarah J. ; Sachdeva, Manavi ; Armitage, James N. ; ‘Aho, Tevita ; Riddick, Antony C. ; Matakidou, Athena ; Eisen, Tim ; Stewart, Grant D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-67f0f9cb69de9e3f6f1a4722e5a5db25c07ae4e18137b12c78327e1346227f3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Kidney cancer</topic><topic>Kidney transplantation</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Nephrectomy</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Renal cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Targeted cancer therapy</topic><topic>Thrombocytosis</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klatte, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fife, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welsh, Sarah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sachdeva, Manavi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armitage, James N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>‘Aho, Tevita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riddick, Antony C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matakidou, Athena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisen, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Grant D.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klatte, Tobias</au><au>Fife, Kate</au><au>Welsh, Sarah J.</au><au>Sachdeva, Manavi</au><au>Armitage, James N.</au><au>‘Aho, Tevita</au><au>Riddick, Antony C.</au><au>Matakidou, Athena</au><au>Eisen, Tim</au><au>Stewart, Grant D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prognostic effect of cytoreductive nephrectomy in synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a comparative study using inverse probability of treatment weighting</atitle><jtitle>World journal of urology</jtitle><stitle>World J Urol</stitle><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>417</spage><epage>425</epage><pages>417-425</pages><issn>0724-4983</issn><eissn>1433-8726</eissn><abstract>Purpose To test the hypothesis that cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) improves overall survival (OS) of patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), who subsequently receive targeted therapies (TT). Methods We identified 261 patients who received TT for synchronous mRCC with or without prior CN. To achieve balance in baseline characteristics between groups, we used the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. We conducted OS analyses, including IPTW-adjusted Kaplan–Meier curves, Cox regression models, interaction term, and landmark and sensitivity analyses. Results Of the 261 patients, 97 (37.2%) received CN and 164 (62.8%) did not. IPTW-adjusted analyses showed a statistically significant OS benefit for patients treated with CN (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.46–0.83, P  = 0.0015). While there was no statistically significant difference in OS at 3 months ( P  = 0.97), 6 months ( P  = 0.67), and 12 months ( P  = 0.11) from diagnosis, a benefit for the CN group was noted at 18 months ( P  = 0.005) and 24 months ( P  = 0.004). On interaction term analyses, the beneficial effect of CN increased with better performance status ( P  = 0.06), in women ( P  = 0.03), and in patients with thrombocytosis ( P  = 0.01). Conclusions IPTW-adjusted analysis of our patient cohort suggests that CN improves OS of patients with synchronous mRCC treated with TT. On the whole, the survival difference appears after 12 months. Specific subgroups may particularly benefit from CN, and these subgroups warrant further investigation in prospective trials.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>29256020</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00345-017-2154-x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4392-6861</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0724-4983
ispartof World journal of urology, 2018-03, Vol.36 (3), p.417-425
issn 0724-4983
1433-8726
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1978733266
source Springer Link
subjects Clinical trials
Kidney cancer
Kidney transplantation
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metastases
Metastasis
Nephrectomy
Nephrology
Oncology
Original Article
Regression analysis
Renal cell carcinoma
Sensitivity analysis
Statistical analysis
Targeted cancer therapy
Thrombocytosis
Urology
title Prognostic effect of cytoreductive nephrectomy in synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a comparative study using inverse probability of treatment weighting
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A40%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prognostic%20effect%20of%20cytoreductive%20nephrectomy%20in%20synchronous%20metastatic%20renal%20cell%20carcinoma:%20a%20comparative%20study%20using%20inverse%20probability%20of%20treatment%20weighting&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Klatte,%20Tobias&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=417&rft.epage=425&rft.pages=417-425&rft.issn=0724-4983&rft.eissn=1433-8726&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00345-017-2154-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1978733266%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-67f0f9cb69de9e3f6f1a4722e5a5db25c07ae4e18137b12c78327e1346227f3c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1978149559&rft_id=info:pmid/29256020&rfr_iscdi=true