Voice outcome indicators for unilateral vocal fold paralysis surgery: a review of the literature

• Published in: European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology 2018-02, Vol.275 (2), p.459-468
• Main Authors: Desuter, G., Dedry, M., Schaar, B., van Lith-Bijl, J., van Benthem, P. P., Sjögren, E. V.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Head and Neck Surgery; Laryngology; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Neurosurgery; Otorhinolaryngology
• ISSN: 0937-4477; 1434-4726
• DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4844-9

Introduction There is no consensus on which voice outcome indicators (VOIs) should be used to compare the merits of the various surgical treatments for unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP). Authors performed a literature review to identify which VOIs are most frequently used and most relevant, in terms of significant change in pre- and post-operative measurements, to assess UVFP surgical treatments. Method A Medline/Pubmed literature review was performed and the most frequently used VOIs were identified using a Pareto diagram. For these most frequently used VOI’s, the number of studies that showed a statistically significant change in pre- and post-operative results were compared to the total number of studies found using that same VOI, this portion was expressed in percent. This percentage was defined as the “percentage of significance” and used to assess changes of each VOI. Results Eleven VOIs were identified using the Pareto analysis. These were, in decreasing order of frequency of citation: maximum phonation time (MPT), jitter, Shimmer, video-stroboscopic examination, noise to harmonic ratio (NHR/HNR), mean air flow (MeAF), fundamental frequency (F0), “Infrequent Perceptional Scales”, GRBAS scale, mean subglottic pressure (MSGP). MPT, MeAF, factor G of GRBAS-I, Jitter, shimmer and VHI-30 had respective “percentage of significance” of 90, 86, 85, 74, 68 and 64%, respectively. Conclusion The results indicate that MPT, MeAF and GRBAS-I, represent the top-three most frequently used and the most relevant VOIs in terms of “percentage of significance”. VHI-30 showed a relatively low rate of use and low “percentage of significance”. The role of Jitter and Shimmer remains unclear. Finally, MSGP and the F0 appear to be less relevant VOIs for the evaluation of UFVP surgical treatments in terms of significant change in pre- and post-operative measurements.