Loading…

Cell therapy with allogenic canine periodontal ligament‐derived cells in periodontal regeneration of critical size defects

Aim The objective of this in vivo experimental study to evaluate the regenerative potential of a cell therapy combining allogenic periodontal ligament‐derived cells within a xenogeneic bone substitute in a similar experimental model. Methods In nine beagle dogs, critical size 6‐mm supra‐alveolar per...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical periodontology 2018-04, Vol.45 (4), p.453-461
Main Authors: Nuñez, Javier, Sanchez, Nerea, Vignoletti, Fabio, Sanz‐Martin, Ignacio, Caffesse, Raul, Santamaria, Silvia, Garcia‐Sanz, Jose A., Sanz, Mariano
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim The objective of this in vivo experimental study to evaluate the regenerative potential of a cell therapy combining allogenic periodontal ligament‐derived cells within a xenogeneic bone substitute in a similar experimental model. Methods In nine beagle dogs, critical size 6‐mm supra‐alveolar periodontal defects were created around the PIII and PIV. The resulting supra‐alveolar defects were randomly treated with either 1.4 × 106 allogenic canine periodontal ligament‐derived cells seeded on de‐proteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen (DBBM‐C) (test group) or DBBM‐C without cells (control group). Specimens were obtained at 3 months, and histological outcomes were studied. Results The histological analysis showed that total furcation closure occurred very seldom in both groups, being the extent of periodontal regeneration located in the apical third of the defect. The calculated amount of periodontal regeneration at the furcation area was comparable in both the test and control groups (1.93 ± 1.14 mm (17%) versus 2.35 ± 1.74 mm (22%), respectively (p = .37). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the amount of new cementum formation 4.49 ± 1.56 mm (41%) versus 4.97 ± 1.05 mm (47%), respectively (p = .45). Conclusions This experimental study was unable to demonstrate the added value of allogenic cell therapy in supra‐crestal periodontal regeneration.
ISSN:0303-6979
1600-051X
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.12863