Loading…

Urban wastewater disinfection by filtration technologies

The microbiological quality of effluents from different macrofiltration systems (pressure sand filter and disc filter) used as pre-treatment and membrane technologies (microfiltration and ultrafiltration) was evaluated in order to determine their possible application as alternatives to disinfection...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Desalination 2006-01, Vol.190 (1), p.16-28
Main Authors: Gómez, M., de la Rua, A., Garralón, G., Plaza, F., Hontoria, E., Gómez, M.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-58025fd6ef04b0deddc442d788b6950a72534bf8309b7a2da835922a139594913
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-58025fd6ef04b0deddc442d788b6950a72534bf8309b7a2da835922a139594913
container_end_page 28
container_issue 1
container_start_page 16
container_title Desalination
container_volume 190
creator Gómez, M.
de la Rua, A.
Garralón, G.
Plaza, F.
Hontoria, E.
Gómez, M.A.
description The microbiological quality of effluents from different macrofiltration systems (pressure sand filter and disc filter) used as pre-treatment and membrane technologies (microfiltration and ultrafiltration) was evaluated in order to determine their possible application as alternatives to disinfection of urban wastewater prior to reutilization. Microbiological quality was determined by reference to nematode egg content, fecal coliforms, E. coli and somatic coliphages. Pathogenic nematode eggs were efficiently retained by the macrofiltration systems. However, since other types of nematode eggs were present in the effluents treated by both systems, the possibility of such infective agents appearing after this type of treatment cannot be discounted. The membrane technologies proved highly efficient at retaining micro-organisms, achieving effluents of excellent microbiological quality. However, the effluents could not be classified as sterile, since contamination of permeation zones gave rise to the presence of micro-organisms. This result casts doubt on the validity of using the fecal coliform indicator to assess microbiological quality of effluents from these systems. Differences between the two membrane technologies were noted with regard to viral particle retention capacity, with only the ultrafiltration module achieving effluents with total absence of fecal contamination indicators. The macrofiltration systems may present problems when used as pre-treatments to standard disinfection systems (UV radiation, reactive oxidant disinfection). Such problems do not arise with the membrane technologies, which offer a valid alternative for the disinfection of urban wastewater prior to reutilization.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.desal.2005.07.014
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19840013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0011916406001202</els_id><sourcerecordid>19840013</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-58025fd6ef04b0deddc442d788b6950a72534bf8309b7a2da835922a139594913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElPwzAUhC0EEmX5BVxygVuC1zg-cEAVm1SJCz1bjv0MrtKk2ClV_z3uInHj9DTSzDzNh9ANwRXBpL5fVA6S6SqKsaiwrDDhJ2hCGslKzmt-iiYYE1IqUvNzdJHSIkuqGJugZh5b0xcbk0bYmBFi4UIKvQc7hqEv2m3hQzdGs1cj2K9-6IbPAOkKnXnTJbg-3ks0f376mL6Ws_eXt-njrLQci7EUDabCuxo85i124JzlnDrZNG2tBDaSCsZb3zCsWmmoMw0TilJDmBKKK8Iu0d2hdxWH7zWkUS9DstB1podhnTRRDc9rWDayg9HGIaUIXq9iWJq41QTrHSW90HtKekdJY6kzpZy6PdabZE3no-ltSH9RWfOaSpF9Dwcf5K0_AaJONkBvwYWYWWk3hH___AJNun25</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19840013</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Urban wastewater disinfection by filtration technologies</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Gómez, M. ; de la Rua, A. ; Garralón, G. ; Plaza, F. ; Hontoria, E. ; Gómez, M.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gómez, M. ; de la Rua, A. ; Garralón, G. ; Plaza, F. ; Hontoria, E. ; Gómez, M.A.</creatorcontrib><description>The microbiological quality of effluents from different macrofiltration systems (pressure sand filter and disc filter) used as pre-treatment and membrane technologies (microfiltration and ultrafiltration) was evaluated in order to determine their possible application as alternatives to disinfection of urban wastewater prior to reutilization. Microbiological quality was determined by reference to nematode egg content, fecal coliforms, E. coli and somatic coliphages. Pathogenic nematode eggs were efficiently retained by the macrofiltration systems. However, since other types of nematode eggs were present in the effluents treated by both systems, the possibility of such infective agents appearing after this type of treatment cannot be discounted. The membrane technologies proved highly efficient at retaining micro-organisms, achieving effluents of excellent microbiological quality. However, the effluents could not be classified as sterile, since contamination of permeation zones gave rise to the presence of micro-organisms. This result casts doubt on the validity of using the fecal coliform indicator to assess microbiological quality of effluents from these systems. Differences between the two membrane technologies were noted with regard to viral particle retention capacity, with only the ultrafiltration module achieving effluents with total absence of fecal contamination indicators. The macrofiltration systems may present problems when used as pre-treatments to standard disinfection systems (UV radiation, reactive oxidant disinfection). Such problems do not arise with the membrane technologies, which offer a valid alternative for the disinfection of urban wastewater prior to reutilization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-9164</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.07.014</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DSLNAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Chemical engineering ; Coliphages ; Escherichia coli ; Exact sciences and technology ; Filtration ; General purification processes ; Liquid-liquid and fluid-solid mechanical separations ; Membrane separation (reverse osmosis, dialysis...) ; Microfiltration ; Nematoda ; Nematode eggs, E. coli ; Pollution ; Ultrafiltration ; Wastewater disinfection ; Wastewaters ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Desalination, 2006-01, Vol.190 (1), p.16-28</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-58025fd6ef04b0deddc442d788b6950a72534bf8309b7a2da835922a139594913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-58025fd6ef04b0deddc442d788b6950a72534bf8309b7a2da835922a139594913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17646275$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gómez, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Rua, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garralón, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plaza, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hontoria, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, M.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Urban wastewater disinfection by filtration technologies</title><title>Desalination</title><description>The microbiological quality of effluents from different macrofiltration systems (pressure sand filter and disc filter) used as pre-treatment and membrane technologies (microfiltration and ultrafiltration) was evaluated in order to determine their possible application as alternatives to disinfection of urban wastewater prior to reutilization. Microbiological quality was determined by reference to nematode egg content, fecal coliforms, E. coli and somatic coliphages. Pathogenic nematode eggs were efficiently retained by the macrofiltration systems. However, since other types of nematode eggs were present in the effluents treated by both systems, the possibility of such infective agents appearing after this type of treatment cannot be discounted. The membrane technologies proved highly efficient at retaining micro-organisms, achieving effluents of excellent microbiological quality. However, the effluents could not be classified as sterile, since contamination of permeation zones gave rise to the presence of micro-organisms. This result casts doubt on the validity of using the fecal coliform indicator to assess microbiological quality of effluents from these systems. Differences between the two membrane technologies were noted with regard to viral particle retention capacity, with only the ultrafiltration module achieving effluents with total absence of fecal contamination indicators. The macrofiltration systems may present problems when used as pre-treatments to standard disinfection systems (UV radiation, reactive oxidant disinfection). Such problems do not arise with the membrane technologies, which offer a valid alternative for the disinfection of urban wastewater prior to reutilization.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Chemical engineering</subject><subject>Coliphages</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>General purification processes</subject><subject>Liquid-liquid and fluid-solid mechanical separations</subject><subject>Membrane separation (reverse osmosis, dialysis...)</subject><subject>Microfiltration</subject><subject>Nematoda</subject><subject>Nematode eggs, E. coli</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Ultrafiltration</subject><subject>Wastewater disinfection</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0011-9164</issn><issn>1873-4464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kElPwzAUhC0EEmX5BVxygVuC1zg-cEAVm1SJCz1bjv0MrtKk2ClV_z3uInHj9DTSzDzNh9ANwRXBpL5fVA6S6SqKsaiwrDDhJ2hCGslKzmt-iiYYE1IqUvNzdJHSIkuqGJugZh5b0xcbk0bYmBFi4UIKvQc7hqEv2m3hQzdGs1cj2K9-6IbPAOkKnXnTJbg-3ks0f376mL6Ws_eXt-njrLQci7EUDabCuxo85i124JzlnDrZNG2tBDaSCsZb3zCsWmmoMw0TilJDmBKKK8Iu0d2hdxWH7zWkUS9DstB1podhnTRRDc9rWDayg9HGIaUIXq9iWJq41QTrHSW90HtKekdJY6kzpZy6PdabZE3no-ltSH9RWfOaSpF9Dwcf5K0_AaJONkBvwYWYWWk3hH___AJNun25</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Gómez, M.</creator><creator>de la Rua, A.</creator><creator>Garralón, G.</creator><creator>Plaza, F.</creator><creator>Hontoria, E.</creator><creator>Gómez, M.A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Urban wastewater disinfection by filtration technologies</title><author>Gómez, M. ; de la Rua, A. ; Garralón, G. ; Plaza, F. ; Hontoria, E. ; Gómez, M.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-58025fd6ef04b0deddc442d788b6950a72534bf8309b7a2da835922a139594913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Chemical engineering</topic><topic>Coliphages</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>General purification processes</topic><topic>Liquid-liquid and fluid-solid mechanical separations</topic><topic>Membrane separation (reverse osmosis, dialysis...)</topic><topic>Microfiltration</topic><topic>Nematoda</topic><topic>Nematode eggs, E. coli</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Ultrafiltration</topic><topic>Wastewater disinfection</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gómez, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Rua, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garralón, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plaza, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hontoria, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, M.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Desalination</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gómez, M.</au><au>de la Rua, A.</au><au>Garralón, G.</au><au>Plaza, F.</au><au>Hontoria, E.</au><au>Gómez, M.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Urban wastewater disinfection by filtration technologies</atitle><jtitle>Desalination</jtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>190</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>16-28</pages><issn>0011-9164</issn><eissn>1873-4464</eissn><coden>DSLNAH</coden><abstract>The microbiological quality of effluents from different macrofiltration systems (pressure sand filter and disc filter) used as pre-treatment and membrane technologies (microfiltration and ultrafiltration) was evaluated in order to determine their possible application as alternatives to disinfection of urban wastewater prior to reutilization. Microbiological quality was determined by reference to nematode egg content, fecal coliforms, E. coli and somatic coliphages. Pathogenic nematode eggs were efficiently retained by the macrofiltration systems. However, since other types of nematode eggs were present in the effluents treated by both systems, the possibility of such infective agents appearing after this type of treatment cannot be discounted. The membrane technologies proved highly efficient at retaining micro-organisms, achieving effluents of excellent microbiological quality. However, the effluents could not be classified as sterile, since contamination of permeation zones gave rise to the presence of micro-organisms. This result casts doubt on the validity of using the fecal coliform indicator to assess microbiological quality of effluents from these systems. Differences between the two membrane technologies were noted with regard to viral particle retention capacity, with only the ultrafiltration module achieving effluents with total absence of fecal contamination indicators. The macrofiltration systems may present problems when used as pre-treatments to standard disinfection systems (UV radiation, reactive oxidant disinfection). Such problems do not arise with the membrane technologies, which offer a valid alternative for the disinfection of urban wastewater prior to reutilization.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.desal.2005.07.014</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-9164
ispartof Desalination, 2006-01, Vol.190 (1), p.16-28
issn 0011-9164
1873-4464
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19840013
source Elsevier
subjects Applied sciences
Chemical engineering
Coliphages
Escherichia coli
Exact sciences and technology
Filtration
General purification processes
Liquid-liquid and fluid-solid mechanical separations
Membrane separation (reverse osmosis, dialysis...)
Microfiltration
Nematoda
Nematode eggs, E. coli
Pollution
Ultrafiltration
Wastewater disinfection
Wastewaters
Water treatment and pollution
title Urban wastewater disinfection by filtration technologies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A35%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Urban%20wastewater%20disinfection%20by%20filtration%20technologies&rft.jtitle=Desalination&rft.au=G%C3%B3mez,%20M.&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=190&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=16-28&rft.issn=0011-9164&rft.eissn=1873-4464&rft.coden=DSLNAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.desal.2005.07.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19840013%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-58025fd6ef04b0deddc442d788b6950a72534bf8309b7a2da835922a139594913%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19840013&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true