Loading…
Influence of Single-Dose Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Early-Onset Pneumonia in High-Risk Intubated Patients
Background Early-onset pneumonia (EOP) after endotracheal intubation is common among critically ill patients with a neurologic injury and is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Methods This retrospective cohort study observed outcomes pre- and post-implementation of an EOP prophylaxis protocol...
Saved in:
Published in: | Neurocritical care 2018-06, Vol.28 (3), p.362-369 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-551c4bc868fd0f17d17f54130d62b1fe2d6af80cf5139f85e2364ff138b1c36d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-551c4bc868fd0f17d17f54130d62b1fe2d6af80cf5139f85e2364ff138b1c36d3 |
container_end_page | 369 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 362 |
container_title | Neurocritical care |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Lewis, Timothy D. Dehne, Kelly A. Morbitzer, Kathryn Rhoney, Denise H. Olm-Shipman, Casey Dedrick Jordan, J. |
description | Background
Early-onset pneumonia (EOP) after endotracheal intubation is common among critically ill patients with a neurologic injury and is associated with worse clinical outcomes.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study observed outcomes pre- and post-implementation of an EOP prophylaxis protocol which involved the administration of a single dose of ceftriaxone 2 g around the time of intubation. The study included patients ≥ 18 years who were admitted to the University of North Carolina Medical Center (UNCMC) neuroscience intensive care unit (NSICU) between April 1, 2014, and October 26, 2016, and intubated for ≥ 72 h.
Results
Among the 172 patients included, use of an EOP prophylaxis protocol resulted in a significant reduction in the rate of microbiologically confirmed EOP compared to those without prophylaxis (7.4 vs 19.8%,
p
= 0.026). However, EOP prophylaxis did not decrease the combined incidence of microbiologically confirmed or clinically suspected EOP (32.2 vs 37.4%,
p
= 0.523). No difference in the rate of late-onset pneumonia (34.6 vs 26.4%,
p
= 0.25) or virulent organism growth (19.8 vs 14.3%,
p
= 0.416) was observed. No difference was observed in the duration of intubation, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, duration of hospitalization, or ICU antibiotic days within 30 days of intubation. In hospital mortality was found to be higher in those who received EOP prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive prophylaxis (45.7 vs 29.7%,
p
= 0.04).
Conclusions
The administration of a single antibiotic dose following intubation may reduce the incidence of microbiologically confirmed EOP in patients with neurologic injury who are intubated ≥ 72 h. A prophylaxis strategy does not appear to increase the rate of virulent organism growth or the rate of late-onset pneumonia. However, this practice is not associated with a decrease in days of antibiotic use in the ICU or any clinical outcomes benefit. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12028-017-0490-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989568842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2919967246</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-551c4bc868fd0f17d17f54130d62b1fe2d6af80cf5139f85e2364ff138b1c36d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kclqHDEQhkVIiJfkAXIxglxykaOSutXS0XgdMHjIchZqtTSW3SONJTVk3j49jGODIacqqK_-Wn6EvgA9BUq77wUYZZJQ6AhtFCXyHTqEthWEKgHvd3kDRCjOD9BRKQ-Usk517Ud0wBQHzoEdorCIfpxctA4nj3-GuBoduUjF4bNYQx9SDRYvc9rcb0fzJxTsU8aXJo9bcheLq3gZ3bROMRgcIr4Jq3vyI5RHvIh16k11A16aGlys5RP64M1Y3OfneIx-X13-Or8ht3fXi_OzW2J5xyppW7BNb6WQfqAeugE6P5_B6SBYD96xQRgvqfUtcOVl6xgXjffAZQ-Wi4Efo2973U1OT5MrVa9DsW4cTXRpKhqUVK2QsmEz-vUN-pCmHOftNFOglOhYI2YK9pTNqZTsvN7ksDZ5q4HqnQ9674OefdA7H7Sce06elad-7YaXjn-PnwG2B8pciiuXX0f_X_UveWuSgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919967246</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Single-Dose Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Early-Onset Pneumonia in High-Risk Intubated Patients</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Lewis, Timothy D. ; Dehne, Kelly A. ; Morbitzer, Kathryn ; Rhoney, Denise H. ; Olm-Shipman, Casey ; Dedrick Jordan, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Timothy D. ; Dehne, Kelly A. ; Morbitzer, Kathryn ; Rhoney, Denise H. ; Olm-Shipman, Casey ; Dedrick Jordan, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Early-onset pneumonia (EOP) after endotracheal intubation is common among critically ill patients with a neurologic injury and is associated with worse clinical outcomes.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study observed outcomes pre- and post-implementation of an EOP prophylaxis protocol which involved the administration of a single dose of ceftriaxone 2 g around the time of intubation. The study included patients ≥ 18 years who were admitted to the University of North Carolina Medical Center (UNCMC) neuroscience intensive care unit (NSICU) between April 1, 2014, and October 26, 2016, and intubated for ≥ 72 h.
Results
Among the 172 patients included, use of an EOP prophylaxis protocol resulted in a significant reduction in the rate of microbiologically confirmed EOP compared to those without prophylaxis (7.4 vs 19.8%,
p
= 0.026). However, EOP prophylaxis did not decrease the combined incidence of microbiologically confirmed or clinically suspected EOP (32.2 vs 37.4%,
p
= 0.523). No difference in the rate of late-onset pneumonia (34.6 vs 26.4%,
p
= 0.25) or virulent organism growth (19.8 vs 14.3%,
p
= 0.416) was observed. No difference was observed in the duration of intubation, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, duration of hospitalization, or ICU antibiotic days within 30 days of intubation. In hospital mortality was found to be higher in those who received EOP prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive prophylaxis (45.7 vs 29.7%,
p
= 0.04).
Conclusions
The administration of a single antibiotic dose following intubation may reduce the incidence of microbiologically confirmed EOP in patients with neurologic injury who are intubated ≥ 72 h. A prophylaxis strategy does not appear to increase the rate of virulent organism growth or the rate of late-onset pneumonia. However, this practice is not associated with a decrease in days of antibiotic use in the ICU or any clinical outcomes benefit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-6933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-0961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12028-017-0490-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29313312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Bacteria ; Critical Care Medicine ; Disease prevention ; Drug dosages ; Hospitals ; Intensive ; Intensive care ; Internal Medicine ; Intubation ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neurology ; Original Article ; Patients ; Penicillin ; Pneumonia ; Streptococcus infections ; Ventilators ; Virulence</subject><ispartof>Neurocritical care, 2018-06, Vol.28 (3), p.362-369</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-551c4bc868fd0f17d17f54130d62b1fe2d6af80cf5139f85e2364ff138b1c36d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-551c4bc868fd0f17d17f54130d62b1fe2d6af80cf5139f85e2364ff138b1c36d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29313312$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Timothy D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehne, Kelly A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morbitzer, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhoney, Denise H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olm-Shipman, Casey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dedrick Jordan, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Single-Dose Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Early-Onset Pneumonia in High-Risk Intubated Patients</title><title>Neurocritical care</title><addtitle>Neurocrit Care</addtitle><addtitle>Neurocrit Care</addtitle><description>Background
Early-onset pneumonia (EOP) after endotracheal intubation is common among critically ill patients with a neurologic injury and is associated with worse clinical outcomes.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study observed outcomes pre- and post-implementation of an EOP prophylaxis protocol which involved the administration of a single dose of ceftriaxone 2 g around the time of intubation. The study included patients ≥ 18 years who were admitted to the University of North Carolina Medical Center (UNCMC) neuroscience intensive care unit (NSICU) between April 1, 2014, and October 26, 2016, and intubated for ≥ 72 h.
Results
Among the 172 patients included, use of an EOP prophylaxis protocol resulted in a significant reduction in the rate of microbiologically confirmed EOP compared to those without prophylaxis (7.4 vs 19.8%,
p
= 0.026). However, EOP prophylaxis did not decrease the combined incidence of microbiologically confirmed or clinically suspected EOP (32.2 vs 37.4%,
p
= 0.523). No difference in the rate of late-onset pneumonia (34.6 vs 26.4%,
p
= 0.25) or virulent organism growth (19.8 vs 14.3%,
p
= 0.416) was observed. No difference was observed in the duration of intubation, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, duration of hospitalization, or ICU antibiotic days within 30 days of intubation. In hospital mortality was found to be higher in those who received EOP prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive prophylaxis (45.7 vs 29.7%,
p
= 0.04).
Conclusions
The administration of a single antibiotic dose following intubation may reduce the incidence of microbiologically confirmed EOP in patients with neurologic injury who are intubated ≥ 72 h. A prophylaxis strategy does not appear to increase the rate of virulent organism growth or the rate of late-onset pneumonia. However, this practice is not associated with a decrease in days of antibiotic use in the ICU or any clinical outcomes benefit.</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Penicillin</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><subject>Streptococcus infections</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><subject>Virulence</subject><issn>1541-6933</issn><issn>1556-0961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kclqHDEQhkVIiJfkAXIxglxykaOSutXS0XgdMHjIchZqtTSW3SONJTVk3j49jGODIacqqK_-Wn6EvgA9BUq77wUYZZJQ6AhtFCXyHTqEthWEKgHvd3kDRCjOD9BRKQ-Usk517Ud0wBQHzoEdorCIfpxctA4nj3-GuBoduUjF4bNYQx9SDRYvc9rcb0fzJxTsU8aXJo9bcheLq3gZ3bROMRgcIr4Jq3vyI5RHvIh16k11A16aGlys5RP64M1Y3OfneIx-X13-Or8ht3fXi_OzW2J5xyppW7BNb6WQfqAeugE6P5_B6SBYD96xQRgvqfUtcOVl6xgXjffAZQ-Wi4Efo2973U1OT5MrVa9DsW4cTXRpKhqUVK2QsmEz-vUN-pCmHOftNFOglOhYI2YK9pTNqZTsvN7ksDZ5q4HqnQ9674OefdA7H7Sce06elad-7YaXjn-PnwG2B8pciiuXX0f_X_UveWuSgQ</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Lewis, Timothy D.</creator><creator>Dehne, Kelly A.</creator><creator>Morbitzer, Kathryn</creator><creator>Rhoney, Denise H.</creator><creator>Olm-Shipman, Casey</creator><creator>Dedrick Jordan, J.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Influence of Single-Dose Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Early-Onset Pneumonia in High-Risk Intubated Patients</title><author>Lewis, Timothy D. ; Dehne, Kelly A. ; Morbitzer, Kathryn ; Rhoney, Denise H. ; Olm-Shipman, Casey ; Dedrick Jordan, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-551c4bc868fd0f17d17f54130d62b1fe2d6af80cf5139f85e2364ff138b1c36d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Penicillin</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><topic>Streptococcus infections</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><topic>Virulence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Timothy D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehne, Kelly A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morbitzer, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhoney, Denise H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olm-Shipman, Casey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dedrick Jordan, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurocritical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewis, Timothy D.</au><au>Dehne, Kelly A.</au><au>Morbitzer, Kathryn</au><au>Rhoney, Denise H.</au><au>Olm-Shipman, Casey</au><au>Dedrick Jordan, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Single-Dose Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Early-Onset Pneumonia in High-Risk Intubated Patients</atitle><jtitle>Neurocritical care</jtitle><stitle>Neurocrit Care</stitle><addtitle>Neurocrit Care</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>362</spage><epage>369</epage><pages>362-369</pages><issn>1541-6933</issn><eissn>1556-0961</eissn><abstract>Background
Early-onset pneumonia (EOP) after endotracheal intubation is common among critically ill patients with a neurologic injury and is associated with worse clinical outcomes.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study observed outcomes pre- and post-implementation of an EOP prophylaxis protocol which involved the administration of a single dose of ceftriaxone 2 g around the time of intubation. The study included patients ≥ 18 years who were admitted to the University of North Carolina Medical Center (UNCMC) neuroscience intensive care unit (NSICU) between April 1, 2014, and October 26, 2016, and intubated for ≥ 72 h.
Results
Among the 172 patients included, use of an EOP prophylaxis protocol resulted in a significant reduction in the rate of microbiologically confirmed EOP compared to those without prophylaxis (7.4 vs 19.8%,
p
= 0.026). However, EOP prophylaxis did not decrease the combined incidence of microbiologically confirmed or clinically suspected EOP (32.2 vs 37.4%,
p
= 0.523). No difference in the rate of late-onset pneumonia (34.6 vs 26.4%,
p
= 0.25) or virulent organism growth (19.8 vs 14.3%,
p
= 0.416) was observed. No difference was observed in the duration of intubation, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, duration of hospitalization, or ICU antibiotic days within 30 days of intubation. In hospital mortality was found to be higher in those who received EOP prophylaxis compared to those who did not receive prophylaxis (45.7 vs 29.7%,
p
= 0.04).
Conclusions
The administration of a single antibiotic dose following intubation may reduce the incidence of microbiologically confirmed EOP in patients with neurologic injury who are intubated ≥ 72 h. A prophylaxis strategy does not appear to increase the rate of virulent organism growth or the rate of late-onset pneumonia. However, this practice is not associated with a decrease in days of antibiotic use in the ICU or any clinical outcomes benefit.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>29313312</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12028-017-0490-8</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1541-6933 |
ispartof | Neurocritical care, 2018-06, Vol.28 (3), p.362-369 |
issn | 1541-6933 1556-0961 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989568842 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Antibiotics Bacteria Critical Care Medicine Disease prevention Drug dosages Hospitals Intensive Intensive care Internal Medicine Intubation Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neurology Original Article Patients Penicillin Pneumonia Streptococcus infections Ventilators Virulence |
title | Influence of Single-Dose Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Early-Onset Pneumonia in High-Risk Intubated Patients |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A20%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Single-Dose%20Antibiotic%20Prophylaxis%20for%20Early-Onset%20Pneumonia%20in%20High-Risk%20Intubated%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Neurocritical%20care&rft.au=Lewis,%20Timothy%20D.&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=362&rft.epage=369&rft.pages=362-369&rft.issn=1541-6933&rft.eissn=1556-0961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12028-017-0490-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2919967246%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-551c4bc868fd0f17d17f54130d62b1fe2d6af80cf5139f85e2364ff138b1c36d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919967246&rft_id=info:pmid/29313312&rfr_iscdi=true |