Loading…
Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery: technical review in open and minimally invasive approaches
Neurophysiological monitoring is of undoubted value for the intraoperative safety of neurosurgical procedures. Widely developed and used for cranial surgery, it is equally as effective, though perhaps less commonly employed, for spinal pathology. The most frequently used techniques for intraoperativ...
Saved in:
Published in: | Neurosurgical review 2019-06, Vol.42 (2), p.297-307 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-f76b3829e6f4477cf52fa5adecd0d0e61cf93aa49c5f50ee8b426f197721e9b43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-f76b3829e6f4477cf52fa5adecd0d0e61cf93aa49c5f50ee8b426f197721e9b43 |
container_end_page | 307 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 297 |
container_title | Neurosurgical review |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Cofano, Fabio Zenga, Francesco Mammi, Marco Altieri, Roberto Marengo, Nicola Ajello, Marco Pacca, Paolo Melcarne, Antonio Junemann, Carola Ducati, Alessandro Garbossa, Diego |
description | Neurophysiological monitoring is of undoubted value for the intraoperative safety of neurosurgical procedures. Widely developed and used for cranial surgery, it is equally as effective, though perhaps less commonly employed, for spinal pathology. The most frequently used techniques for intraoperative monitoring during spinal surgery include somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and electromyography, which can either be spontaneous free-running (sEMG) or triggered (tEMG). The knowledge of the benefits and limitations of each modality is essential in optimising the value of intraoperative monitoring during spinal procedures. This review will analyse the single techniques, their anatomical and physiological basis, their use in spinal surgery as reliable indicators of functional injury, their limits and their application to specific procedures in minimally invasive surgery, such as the lateral transpsoas access for interbody fusion and the divergent trajectory for cortico-pedicular screws. In these particular techniques, because of reduced visual exposure, neuromonitoring is indeed essential to exploit the full potential of minimally invasive surgery, while avoiding damage to nervous structures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10143-017-0939-4 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989571191</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1989571191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-f76b3829e6f4477cf52fa5adecd0d0e61cf93aa49c5f50ee8b426f197721e9b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLFu2zAQhomiQe0kfYAugcYuSnkiJZrdgqBtDATokswETR1tGhKpkJIDL332UrGbsdMBd9_9h_sI-QL0FigV3xJQ4KykIEoqmSz5B7LMDVFWrKIfyZIyzsu6oWJBLlPa0wxKCp_IopIMGKxgSf6s_Rh1GDDq0R2w8DjFMOyOyYUubJ3RXdEH78YQnd8W7fRW0uB8HqQpbjEevxcjmp1_YyMeHL4Wzhc50hfat0XvvOt11x1z96DTfEQPQwza7DBdkwuru4Sfz_WKPP_88XT_UD7-_rW-v3ssTX5hLK1oNmxVSWws50IYW1dW17pF09KWYgPGSqY1l6a2NUVcbXjVWJBCVIByw9kV-XrKzYdfJkyj6l0y2HXaY5iSArmStQCQkFE4oSaGlCJaNcT8QDwqoGrWrk7aVbapZu1qjr85x0-bHtv3jX-eM1CdgDTMBjGqfZhilpj-k_oXrGmRow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1989571191</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery: technical review in open and minimally invasive approaches</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Cofano, Fabio ; Zenga, Francesco ; Mammi, Marco ; Altieri, Roberto ; Marengo, Nicola ; Ajello, Marco ; Pacca, Paolo ; Melcarne, Antonio ; Junemann, Carola ; Ducati, Alessandro ; Garbossa, Diego</creator><creatorcontrib>Cofano, Fabio ; Zenga, Francesco ; Mammi, Marco ; Altieri, Roberto ; Marengo, Nicola ; Ajello, Marco ; Pacca, Paolo ; Melcarne, Antonio ; Junemann, Carola ; Ducati, Alessandro ; Garbossa, Diego</creatorcontrib><description>Neurophysiological monitoring is of undoubted value for the intraoperative safety of neurosurgical procedures. Widely developed and used for cranial surgery, it is equally as effective, though perhaps less commonly employed, for spinal pathology. The most frequently used techniques for intraoperative monitoring during spinal surgery include somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and electromyography, which can either be spontaneous free-running (sEMG) or triggered (tEMG). The knowledge of the benefits and limitations of each modality is essential in optimising the value of intraoperative monitoring during spinal procedures. This review will analyse the single techniques, their anatomical and physiological basis, their use in spinal surgery as reliable indicators of functional injury, their limits and their application to specific procedures in minimally invasive surgery, such as the lateral transpsoas access for interbody fusion and the divergent trajectory for cortico-pedicular screws. In these particular techniques, because of reduced visual exposure, neuromonitoring is indeed essential to exploit the full potential of minimally invasive surgery, while avoiding damage to nervous structures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0344-5607</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1437-2320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10143-017-0939-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29313181</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neurosurgery ; Review</subject><ispartof>Neurosurgical review, 2019-06, Vol.42 (2), p.297-307</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-f76b3829e6f4477cf52fa5adecd0d0e61cf93aa49c5f50ee8b426f197721e9b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-f76b3829e6f4477cf52fa5adecd0d0e61cf93aa49c5f50ee8b426f197721e9b43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5100-7478</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29313181$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cofano, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zenga, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mammi, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altieri, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marengo, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajello, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacca, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melcarne, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junemann, Carola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducati, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garbossa, Diego</creatorcontrib><title>Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery: technical review in open and minimally invasive approaches</title><title>Neurosurgical review</title><addtitle>Neurosurg Rev</addtitle><addtitle>Neurosurg Rev</addtitle><description>Neurophysiological monitoring is of undoubted value for the intraoperative safety of neurosurgical procedures. Widely developed and used for cranial surgery, it is equally as effective, though perhaps less commonly employed, for spinal pathology. The most frequently used techniques for intraoperative monitoring during spinal surgery include somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and electromyography, which can either be spontaneous free-running (sEMG) or triggered (tEMG). The knowledge of the benefits and limitations of each modality is essential in optimising the value of intraoperative monitoring during spinal procedures. This review will analyse the single techniques, their anatomical and physiological basis, their use in spinal surgery as reliable indicators of functional injury, their limits and their application to specific procedures in minimally invasive surgery, such as the lateral transpsoas access for interbody fusion and the divergent trajectory for cortico-pedicular screws. In these particular techniques, because of reduced visual exposure, neuromonitoring is indeed essential to exploit the full potential of minimally invasive surgery, while avoiding damage to nervous structures.</description><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Review</subject><issn>0344-5607</issn><issn>1437-2320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kLFu2zAQhomiQe0kfYAugcYuSnkiJZrdgqBtDATokswETR1tGhKpkJIDL332UrGbsdMBd9_9h_sI-QL0FigV3xJQ4KykIEoqmSz5B7LMDVFWrKIfyZIyzsu6oWJBLlPa0wxKCp_IopIMGKxgSf6s_Rh1GDDq0R2w8DjFMOyOyYUubJ3RXdEH78YQnd8W7fRW0uB8HqQpbjEevxcjmp1_YyMeHL4Wzhc50hfat0XvvOt11x1z96DTfEQPQwza7DBdkwuru4Sfz_WKPP_88XT_UD7-_rW-v3ssTX5hLK1oNmxVSWws50IYW1dW17pF09KWYgPGSqY1l6a2NUVcbXjVWJBCVIByw9kV-XrKzYdfJkyj6l0y2HXaY5iSArmStQCQkFE4oSaGlCJaNcT8QDwqoGrWrk7aVbapZu1qjr85x0-bHtv3jX-eM1CdgDTMBjGqfZhilpj-k_oXrGmRow</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Cofano, Fabio</creator><creator>Zenga, Francesco</creator><creator>Mammi, Marco</creator><creator>Altieri, Roberto</creator><creator>Marengo, Nicola</creator><creator>Ajello, Marco</creator><creator>Pacca, Paolo</creator><creator>Melcarne, Antonio</creator><creator>Junemann, Carola</creator><creator>Ducati, Alessandro</creator><creator>Garbossa, Diego</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5100-7478</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery: technical review in open and minimally invasive approaches</title><author>Cofano, Fabio ; Zenga, Francesco ; Mammi, Marco ; Altieri, Roberto ; Marengo, Nicola ; Ajello, Marco ; Pacca, Paolo ; Melcarne, Antonio ; Junemann, Carola ; Ducati, Alessandro ; Garbossa, Diego</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-f76b3829e6f4477cf52fa5adecd0d0e61cf93aa49c5f50ee8b426f197721e9b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cofano, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zenga, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mammi, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altieri, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marengo, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajello, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacca, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melcarne, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junemann, Carola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducati, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garbossa, Diego</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurosurgical review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cofano, Fabio</au><au>Zenga, Francesco</au><au>Mammi, Marco</au><au>Altieri, Roberto</au><au>Marengo, Nicola</au><au>Ajello, Marco</au><au>Pacca, Paolo</au><au>Melcarne, Antonio</au><au>Junemann, Carola</au><au>Ducati, Alessandro</au><au>Garbossa, Diego</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery: technical review in open and minimally invasive approaches</atitle><jtitle>Neurosurgical review</jtitle><stitle>Neurosurg Rev</stitle><addtitle>Neurosurg Rev</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>297</spage><epage>307</epage><pages>297-307</pages><issn>0344-5607</issn><eissn>1437-2320</eissn><abstract>Neurophysiological monitoring is of undoubted value for the intraoperative safety of neurosurgical procedures. Widely developed and used for cranial surgery, it is equally as effective, though perhaps less commonly employed, for spinal pathology. The most frequently used techniques for intraoperative monitoring during spinal surgery include somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and electromyography, which can either be spontaneous free-running (sEMG) or triggered (tEMG). The knowledge of the benefits and limitations of each modality is essential in optimising the value of intraoperative monitoring during spinal procedures. This review will analyse the single techniques, their anatomical and physiological basis, their use in spinal surgery as reliable indicators of functional injury, their limits and their application to specific procedures in minimally invasive surgery, such as the lateral transpsoas access for interbody fusion and the divergent trajectory for cortico-pedicular screws. In these particular techniques, because of reduced visual exposure, neuromonitoring is indeed essential to exploit the full potential of minimally invasive surgery, while avoiding damage to nervous structures.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>29313181</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10143-017-0939-4</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5100-7478</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0344-5607 |
ispartof | Neurosurgical review, 2019-06, Vol.42 (2), p.297-307 |
issn | 0344-5607 1437-2320 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989571191 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neurosurgery Review |
title | Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery: technical review in open and minimally invasive approaches |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T05%3A20%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraoperative%20neurophysiological%20monitoring%20during%20spinal%20surgery:%20technical%20review%20in%20open%20and%20minimally%20invasive%20approaches&rft.jtitle=Neurosurgical%20review&rft.au=Cofano,%20Fabio&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=297&rft.epage=307&rft.pages=297-307&rft.issn=0344-5607&rft.eissn=1437-2320&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10143-017-0939-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1989571191%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-f76b3829e6f4477cf52fa5adecd0d0e61cf93aa49c5f50ee8b426f197721e9b43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1989571191&rft_id=info:pmid/29313181&rfr_iscdi=true |