Loading…

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery: technical review in open and minimally invasive approaches

Neurophysiological monitoring is of undoubted value for the intraoperative safety of neurosurgical procedures. Widely developed and used for cranial surgery, it is equally as effective, though perhaps less commonly employed, for spinal pathology. The most frequently used techniques for intraoperativ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neurosurgical review 2019-06, Vol.42 (2), p.297-307
Main Authors: Cofano, Fabio, Zenga, Francesco, Mammi, Marco, Altieri, Roberto, Marengo, Nicola, Ajello, Marco, Pacca, Paolo, Melcarne, Antonio, Junemann, Carola, Ducati, Alessandro, Garbossa, Diego
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-f76b3829e6f4477cf52fa5adecd0d0e61cf93aa49c5f50ee8b426f197721e9b43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-f76b3829e6f4477cf52fa5adecd0d0e61cf93aa49c5f50ee8b426f197721e9b43
container_end_page 307
container_issue 2
container_start_page 297
container_title Neurosurgical review
container_volume 42
creator Cofano, Fabio
Zenga, Francesco
Mammi, Marco
Altieri, Roberto
Marengo, Nicola
Ajello, Marco
Pacca, Paolo
Melcarne, Antonio
Junemann, Carola
Ducati, Alessandro
Garbossa, Diego
description Neurophysiological monitoring is of undoubted value for the intraoperative safety of neurosurgical procedures. Widely developed and used for cranial surgery, it is equally as effective, though perhaps less commonly employed, for spinal pathology. The most frequently used techniques for intraoperative monitoring during spinal surgery include somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and electromyography, which can either be spontaneous free-running (sEMG) or triggered (tEMG). The knowledge of the benefits and limitations of each modality is essential in optimising the value of intraoperative monitoring during spinal procedures. This review will analyse the single techniques, their anatomical and physiological basis, their use in spinal surgery as reliable indicators of functional injury, their limits and their application to specific procedures in minimally invasive surgery, such as the lateral transpsoas access for interbody fusion and the divergent trajectory for cortico-pedicular screws. In these particular techniques, because of reduced visual exposure, neuromonitoring is indeed essential to exploit the full potential of minimally invasive surgery, while avoiding damage to nervous structures.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10143-017-0939-4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989571191</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1989571191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-f76b3829e6f4477cf52fa5adecd0d0e61cf93aa49c5f50ee8b426f197721e9b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLFu2zAQhomiQe0kfYAugcYuSnkiJZrdgqBtDATokswETR1tGhKpkJIDL332UrGbsdMBd9_9h_sI-QL0FigV3xJQ4KykIEoqmSz5B7LMDVFWrKIfyZIyzsu6oWJBLlPa0wxKCp_IopIMGKxgSf6s_Rh1GDDq0R2w8DjFMOyOyYUubJ3RXdEH78YQnd8W7fRW0uB8HqQpbjEevxcjmp1_YyMeHL4Wzhc50hfat0XvvOt11x1z96DTfEQPQwza7DBdkwuru4Sfz_WKPP_88XT_UD7-_rW-v3ssTX5hLK1oNmxVSWws50IYW1dW17pF09KWYgPGSqY1l6a2NUVcbXjVWJBCVIByw9kV-XrKzYdfJkyj6l0y2HXaY5iSArmStQCQkFE4oSaGlCJaNcT8QDwqoGrWrk7aVbapZu1qjr85x0-bHtv3jX-eM1CdgDTMBjGqfZhilpj-k_oXrGmRow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1989571191</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery: technical review in open and minimally invasive approaches</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Cofano, Fabio ; Zenga, Francesco ; Mammi, Marco ; Altieri, Roberto ; Marengo, Nicola ; Ajello, Marco ; Pacca, Paolo ; Melcarne, Antonio ; Junemann, Carola ; Ducati, Alessandro ; Garbossa, Diego</creator><creatorcontrib>Cofano, Fabio ; Zenga, Francesco ; Mammi, Marco ; Altieri, Roberto ; Marengo, Nicola ; Ajello, Marco ; Pacca, Paolo ; Melcarne, Antonio ; Junemann, Carola ; Ducati, Alessandro ; Garbossa, Diego</creatorcontrib><description>Neurophysiological monitoring is of undoubted value for the intraoperative safety of neurosurgical procedures. Widely developed and used for cranial surgery, it is equally as effective, though perhaps less commonly employed, for spinal pathology. The most frequently used techniques for intraoperative monitoring during spinal surgery include somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and electromyography, which can either be spontaneous free-running (sEMG) or triggered (tEMG). The knowledge of the benefits and limitations of each modality is essential in optimising the value of intraoperative monitoring during spinal procedures. This review will analyse the single techniques, their anatomical and physiological basis, their use in spinal surgery as reliable indicators of functional injury, their limits and their application to specific procedures in minimally invasive surgery, such as the lateral transpsoas access for interbody fusion and the divergent trajectory for cortico-pedicular screws. In these particular techniques, because of reduced visual exposure, neuromonitoring is indeed essential to exploit the full potential of minimally invasive surgery, while avoiding damage to nervous structures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0344-5607</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1437-2320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10143-017-0939-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29313181</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neurosurgery ; Review</subject><ispartof>Neurosurgical review, 2019-06, Vol.42 (2), p.297-307</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-f76b3829e6f4477cf52fa5adecd0d0e61cf93aa49c5f50ee8b426f197721e9b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-f76b3829e6f4477cf52fa5adecd0d0e61cf93aa49c5f50ee8b426f197721e9b43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5100-7478</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29313181$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cofano, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zenga, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mammi, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altieri, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marengo, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajello, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacca, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melcarne, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junemann, Carola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducati, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garbossa, Diego</creatorcontrib><title>Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery: technical review in open and minimally invasive approaches</title><title>Neurosurgical review</title><addtitle>Neurosurg Rev</addtitle><addtitle>Neurosurg Rev</addtitle><description>Neurophysiological monitoring is of undoubted value for the intraoperative safety of neurosurgical procedures. Widely developed and used for cranial surgery, it is equally as effective, though perhaps less commonly employed, for spinal pathology. The most frequently used techniques for intraoperative monitoring during spinal surgery include somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and electromyography, which can either be spontaneous free-running (sEMG) or triggered (tEMG). The knowledge of the benefits and limitations of each modality is essential in optimising the value of intraoperative monitoring during spinal procedures. This review will analyse the single techniques, their anatomical and physiological basis, their use in spinal surgery as reliable indicators of functional injury, their limits and their application to specific procedures in minimally invasive surgery, such as the lateral transpsoas access for interbody fusion and the divergent trajectory for cortico-pedicular screws. In these particular techniques, because of reduced visual exposure, neuromonitoring is indeed essential to exploit the full potential of minimally invasive surgery, while avoiding damage to nervous structures.</description><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Review</subject><issn>0344-5607</issn><issn>1437-2320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kLFu2zAQhomiQe0kfYAugcYuSnkiJZrdgqBtDATokswETR1tGhKpkJIDL332UrGbsdMBd9_9h_sI-QL0FigV3xJQ4KykIEoqmSz5B7LMDVFWrKIfyZIyzsu6oWJBLlPa0wxKCp_IopIMGKxgSf6s_Rh1GDDq0R2w8DjFMOyOyYUubJ3RXdEH78YQnd8W7fRW0uB8HqQpbjEevxcjmp1_YyMeHL4Wzhc50hfat0XvvOt11x1z96DTfEQPQwza7DBdkwuru4Sfz_WKPP_88XT_UD7-_rW-v3ssTX5hLK1oNmxVSWws50IYW1dW17pF09KWYgPGSqY1l6a2NUVcbXjVWJBCVIByw9kV-XrKzYdfJkyj6l0y2HXaY5iSArmStQCQkFE4oSaGlCJaNcT8QDwqoGrWrk7aVbapZu1qjr85x0-bHtv3jX-eM1CdgDTMBjGqfZhilpj-k_oXrGmRow</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Cofano, Fabio</creator><creator>Zenga, Francesco</creator><creator>Mammi, Marco</creator><creator>Altieri, Roberto</creator><creator>Marengo, Nicola</creator><creator>Ajello, Marco</creator><creator>Pacca, Paolo</creator><creator>Melcarne, Antonio</creator><creator>Junemann, Carola</creator><creator>Ducati, Alessandro</creator><creator>Garbossa, Diego</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5100-7478</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery: technical review in open and minimally invasive approaches</title><author>Cofano, Fabio ; Zenga, Francesco ; Mammi, Marco ; Altieri, Roberto ; Marengo, Nicola ; Ajello, Marco ; Pacca, Paolo ; Melcarne, Antonio ; Junemann, Carola ; Ducati, Alessandro ; Garbossa, Diego</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-f76b3829e6f4477cf52fa5adecd0d0e61cf93aa49c5f50ee8b426f197721e9b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cofano, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zenga, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mammi, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altieri, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marengo, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajello, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacca, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melcarne, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junemann, Carola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducati, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garbossa, Diego</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurosurgical review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cofano, Fabio</au><au>Zenga, Francesco</au><au>Mammi, Marco</au><au>Altieri, Roberto</au><au>Marengo, Nicola</au><au>Ajello, Marco</au><au>Pacca, Paolo</au><au>Melcarne, Antonio</au><au>Junemann, Carola</au><au>Ducati, Alessandro</au><au>Garbossa, Diego</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery: technical review in open and minimally invasive approaches</atitle><jtitle>Neurosurgical review</jtitle><stitle>Neurosurg Rev</stitle><addtitle>Neurosurg Rev</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>297</spage><epage>307</epage><pages>297-307</pages><issn>0344-5607</issn><eissn>1437-2320</eissn><abstract>Neurophysiological monitoring is of undoubted value for the intraoperative safety of neurosurgical procedures. Widely developed and used for cranial surgery, it is equally as effective, though perhaps less commonly employed, for spinal pathology. The most frequently used techniques for intraoperative monitoring during spinal surgery include somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and electromyography, which can either be spontaneous free-running (sEMG) or triggered (tEMG). The knowledge of the benefits and limitations of each modality is essential in optimising the value of intraoperative monitoring during spinal procedures. This review will analyse the single techniques, their anatomical and physiological basis, their use in spinal surgery as reliable indicators of functional injury, their limits and their application to specific procedures in minimally invasive surgery, such as the lateral transpsoas access for interbody fusion and the divergent trajectory for cortico-pedicular screws. In these particular techniques, because of reduced visual exposure, neuromonitoring is indeed essential to exploit the full potential of minimally invasive surgery, while avoiding damage to nervous structures.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>29313181</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10143-017-0939-4</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5100-7478</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0344-5607
ispartof Neurosurgical review, 2019-06, Vol.42 (2), p.297-307
issn 0344-5607
1437-2320
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989571191
source Springer Link
subjects Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neurosurgery
Review
title Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery: technical review in open and minimally invasive approaches
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T05%3A20%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraoperative%20neurophysiological%20monitoring%20during%20spinal%20surgery:%20technical%20review%20in%20open%20and%20minimally%20invasive%20approaches&rft.jtitle=Neurosurgical%20review&rft.au=Cofano,%20Fabio&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=297&rft.epage=307&rft.pages=297-307&rft.issn=0344-5607&rft.eissn=1437-2320&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10143-017-0939-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1989571191%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-f76b3829e6f4477cf52fa5adecd0d0e61cf93aa49c5f50ee8b426f197721e9b43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1989571191&rft_id=info:pmid/29313181&rfr_iscdi=true