Angiographic follow‐up of infants and children undergoing percutaneous carotid artery interventions

• Published in: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2018-06, Vol.91 (7), p.1301-1306
• Main Authors: Ligon, R. Allen, Kim, Dennis W., Vincent, Robert N., Bauser‐Heaton, Holly D., Ooi, Yinn K., Petit, Christopher J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Angiography; cardiac catheterization; Carotid arteries; Carotid artery; Catheterization; Children; Complications; Coronary artery disease; Femur; Heart diseases; Infants; Intubation; Irregularities; Medical imaging; Patients; pediatric cardiology; Risk factors; Statistical analysis; Stenosis
• ISSN: 1522-1946; 1522-726X
• DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27481

Objective The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes following the percutaneous carotid arterial (PCA) approach in infants and children with congenital heart disease. Background PCA access is becoming more commonly adopted following reports demonstrating it is a safe alternative to surgical carotid cutdown and even the femoral arterial route. However, follow‐up outcomes after PCA remain unreported. Methods We reviewed all cases with PCA access and follow‐up catheterizations which included carotid artery (CA) angiography between May 2012 until December 2016. We examined for evidence of CA stenosis at follow‐up angiography and assessed any other CA complications associated with vascular access. Results There were 61 PCA catheterizations performed in 55 unique patients. Follow‐up CA imaging with angiography was available in 43 patients (78%, 43/55). There was no vessel stenosis nor lumen irregularity in 28 (65%) patients. In 15 cases (35%), there was a mild degree of irregularity or narrowing by angiography (median 4.1%, range 2.3%–12.5%). Nine patients underwent repeat PCA catheterizations. Seven of these had no visible vascular stenosis on follow‐up angiographic imaging, including a patient who was accessed three separate times from the CA. No statistically significant risk factors for developing mild CA stenosis were identified. Conclusions PCA access for pediatric interventional catheterization appears to be safe with a very low rate of mild stenosis, and very few complications. Follow‐up outcomes in our series are excellent, with a CA patency rate of 100%, even after multiple procedures. Mild CA stenosis was not associated with patient size or sheath introducer caliber. While the acute results from percutaneous CA catheterization have proven safe in recent literature, longer‐term outcomes remain unreported. At our institution, the outcomes following percutaneous carotid access are associated with an excellent patency rate of 100%, even after multiple procedures on the same vessel. A low incidence of mild vessel stenosis can be appreciated on follow‐up angiography.