Loading…

HEPATOLOGY: Value of computed tomography-derived estimated liver volume-standard liver volume ratio for predicting the prognosis of adult fulminant hepatic failure in Japan

Background and Aims:The prognosis of fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) has been improved but is still unsatisfactory, and liver atrophy has been reported as a poor prognostic factor for this disease. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical value of the estimated liver volume (ELV) compared to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2005-12, Vol.20 (12), p.1843-1849
Main Authors: Yamagishi, Yoshiyuki, Saito, Hidetsugu, Tada, Shinichiro, Horie, Yoshinori, Kato, Shinzo, Ishii, Hiromasa, Shimojima, Naoki, Haga, Junko, Shimazu, Motohide, Kitajima, Masaki, Hibi, Toshifumi
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background and Aims:The prognosis of fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) has been improved but is still unsatisfactory, and liver atrophy has been reported as a poor prognostic factor for this disease. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical value of the estimated liver volume (ELV) compared to the standard liver volume (SLV) in patients with FHF. Methods:Estimated liver volume of 24 adult patients with FHF receiving artificial liver support (ALS) was measured by using computed tomography. Actual liver weight (ALW) was measured if possible, and the calculated ELV-SLV ratio was compared to the ALW-SLV ratio and the ALW-BW (bodyweight) ratio. Sequential ELV-SLV ratios during the clinical course were analyzed in relation to the prognosis. Results:The ELV-SLV ratio was significantly correlated with both the ALW-SLV and ALW-BW ratios. The mean ALW-SLV ratio of patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was 0.59 plus or minus 0.17. The mean ELV-SLV ratio at the time of starting ALS (day 0) in the patients who survived (group 1) was 1.081 plus or minus 0.183, but that of cases who underwent LDLT or died without LDLT (group 2) was 0.764 plus or minus 0.255. The mean ELV-SLV ratios were 1.084 plus or minus 0.222 and 0.650 plus or minus 0.195 in groups 1 and 2, respectively, 5 days after starting ALS (day 5). Among the group 2 patients, those who had no liver atrophy on day 0 had a significantly decreased ELV-SLV ratio on day 5. Conclusions:These results suggest that the ELV-SLV ratio is a very useful objective marker to estimate liver atrophy and this marker reflects the prognosis of FHF patients very well.
ISSN:0815-9319
1440-1746
DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.03949.x