Network geometry of evidence from randomised controlled trials addressing donor selection and source of haematopoietic progenitor cells used in allogeneic transplantation: a systematic scoping review

• Published in: Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) England), 2018-10, Vol.28 (5), p.371-379
• Main Authors: Monaghan, M., Rizk, M., Pilon, S., Iyengar, A., Shorr, R., Tay, J., Maze, D., Bredeson, C., Hutton, B., Allan, D. S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Allografts; bone marrow; cell source; donor; Donor Selection - methods; haematopoietic; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Hematopoietic Stem Cells; Humans; network geometry; randomised controlled trials; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; stem and progenitor cells; transplant; Unrelated Donors
• ISSN: 0958-7578; 1365-3148
• DOI: 10.1111/tme.12509

SUMMARY Background and Methods A scoping review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) addressing source of cells and choice of donor for allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was performed to create a network of best evidence that allows us to identify new potential indirect comparisons for the strategic development of future studies that connect to the existing evidence network. Results A total of 19 eligible RCTs (2589 total patients) were identified. Nine studies (1566 patients) compared clinical outcomes following the use of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) with bone marrow (BM) from matched related donors (eight studies) or matched unrelated donors (one study). The remaining studies compared BM or PBPCs with various methods of BM stimulation or manipulation (six studies), compared different methods of surface molecule‐based selection and/or depletion of grafts (two studies) or compared the optimal number of units for paediatric cord blood transplantation (two studies). No published RCTs compared different types of donors. The geometry of the evidence network was analysed to identify opportunities for potential novel indirect comparisons and to identify opportunities to expand the network. Few indirect comparisons are currently feasible due to small sample size and heterogeneity in patient diagnoses and demographics between treatment nodes in the network. Conclusion More RCTs that enrol greater numbers of similar patients are needed to leverage the current evidence network concerning donor choice and source of cells used in allogeneic HCT.