Accuracy, intra‐ and inter‐unit reliability, and comparison between GPS and UWB‐based position‐tracking systems used for time–motion analyses in soccer

• Published in: European journal of sport science 2018-05, Vol.18 (4), p.450-457
• Main Authors: Bastida Castillo, Alejandro, Gómez Carmona, Carlos D., De la cruz sánchez, Ernesto, Pino Ortega, José
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Data; game analysis; Geographic Information Systems; Humans; measurement; Radio Waves; Reproducibility of Results; Soccer; Task Performance and Analysis; technology; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1746-1391; 1536-7290
• DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2018.1427796

There is interest in the accuracy and inter‐unit reliability of position‐tracking systems to monitor players. Research into this technology, although relatively recent, has grown exponentially in the last years, and it is difficult to find professional team sport that does not use Global Positioning System (GPS) technology at least. The aim of this study is to know the accuracy of both GPS‐based and Ultra Wide Band (UWB)‐based systems on a soccer field and their inter‐ and intra‐unit reliability. A secondary aim is to compare them for practical applications in sport science. Following institutional ethical approval and familiarization, 10 healthy and well‐trained former soccer players (20 ± 1.6 years, 1.76 ± 0.08 cm, and 69.5 ± 9.8 kg) performed three course tests: (i) linear course, (ii) circular course, and (iii) a zig–zag course, all using UWB and GPS technologies. The average speed and distance covered were compared with timing gates and the real distance as references. The UWB technology showed better accuracy (bias: 0.57–5.85%), test–retest reliability (%TEM: 1.19), and inter‐unit reliability (bias: 0.18) in determining distance covered than the GPS technology (bias: 0.69–6.05%; %TEM: 1.47; bias: 0.25) overall. Also, UWB showed better results (bias: 0.09; ICC: 0.979; bias: 0.01) for mean velocity measurement than GPS (bias: 0.18; ICC: 0.951; bias: 0.03).