Importance of Reserve Size and Landscape Context to Urban Bird Conservation

• Published in: Conservation biology 2004-06, Vol.18 (3), p.733-745
• Main Authors: DONNELLY, ROARKE, MARZLUFF, JOHN M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Applied ecology; ave canora de bosque; Biological and medical sciences; Bird nesting; Birds; conservación urbana; Conservation biology; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife; depredación de nidos; exotic vegetation; Forest conservation; Forest habitats; forest songbird; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Habitat conservation; Land cover; nest predation; paisaje urbano; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking; reserve size; Shrubs; tamaño de reserva; urban conservation; Urban habitats; urban landscape; Urbanization; vegetación exótica
• ISSN: 0888-8892; 1523-1739
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00032.x

We tested whether reserve size, landscape surrounding the reserve, and their interaction affect forest songbirds in the metropolitan area of Seattle, Washington (U.S.A.), by studying 29 reserves of varying size (small, medium, large) and surrounding urbanization intensity (urban, suburban, exurban). Larger reserves contained richer and less even bird communities than smaller reserves. These size effects disappeared when we removed the positive correlation of shrub diversity with reserve size, suggesting that greater habitat diversity in large reserves supported additional species, some of which were rare. Standardizing the number of individuals detected among all reserve size classes reversed the effect of size on richness in exurban landscapes and reduced the magnitude of the effect in suburban or urban landscapes. The latter change suggested that richness increased with reserve size in most landscapes because larger areas also supported larger samples from the regional bird species pool. Most bird species associated with native forest habitat (native forest species) and with human activity (synanthropic species) were present in reserves larger than 42 ha and surrounded by >40% urban land cover, respectively. Thus, we recommend these thresholds as means for conserving the composition of native bird communities in this mostly forested region. Native forest species were least abundant and synanthropic species most abundant in urban landscapes, where exotic ground and shrub vegetation was most common. Therefore, control of exotic vegetation may benefit native songbird populations. Bird nests in shrubs were most dense in medium (suburban) and large reserves (urban) and tended to be most successful in medium (suburban) and large reserves (exurban), potentially supplying another mechanism by which reserve size increased retention of native forest species.