Loading…

Microelectrode accuracy in deep brain stimulation surgery

•MER confirms the neurophysiological target in DBS surgery.•Until now, no prior studies have assessed the target accuracy of the microelectrode.•Microelectrode targeting is accurate within reasonable radial error. Microelectrode recording (MER) provides vital neurophysiological information about tar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical neuroscience 2018-04, Vol.50, p.58-61
Main Authors: Brahimaj, Bledi, Kochanski, Ryan B., Sani, Sepehr
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-229c9abf354766ce322e50e71051229e24e563351995c25c76f0f8f3ccea51af3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-229c9abf354766ce322e50e71051229e24e563351995c25c76f0f8f3ccea51af3
container_end_page 61
container_issue
container_start_page 58
container_title Journal of clinical neuroscience
container_volume 50
creator Brahimaj, Bledi
Kochanski, Ryan B.
Sani, Sepehr
description •MER confirms the neurophysiological target in DBS surgery.•Until now, no prior studies have assessed the target accuracy of the microelectrode.•Microelectrode targeting is accurate within reasonable radial error. Microelectrode recording (MER) provides vital neurophysiological information about target nuclei during deep brain stimulation (DBS). There have been extensive studies looking at the accuracy of DBS lead placement; however, to date, no large series have assessed the accuracy of the microelectrode. In this study, we report the accuracy of microelectrode tip placement in comparison to preoperatively planned radiographic target. Patients who underwent DBS with MER from 2014 to 2016 were included in the study. At the authors’ institution, intra-operative CT (iCT) is routinely performed after the first microelectrode track to confirm tip accuracy. Retrospective analysis of microelectrode track error was calculated between the planned trajectory and the microelectrode tip. The radial error was calculated on the same axial plane using the Euclidian distance formula, and multivariate analysis was performed to ascertain any directional bias of error. A total of 227 microelectrode tracks were analyzed, (150 STN, 50 ViM, 27 GPi) yielding a total radial error of 1.2 mm ± 0.2 SEM across all targets. Analysis of vector error distribution revealed lack of directional bias. MER is an accurate electrophysiological representation of the planned target.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.01.020
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1993993368</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0967586817312377</els_id><sourcerecordid>1993993368</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-229c9abf354766ce322e50e71051229e24e563351995c25c76f0f8f3ccea51af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMotla_gAfZo5ddJ0mT3YAXEf9BxYueQzo7Kynb3ZrsCv32prR6FAZmYN578H6MXXIoOHB9sypWPXaFAF4VwAsQcMSmXEmRC63kMZuC0WWuKl1N2FmMKwAwcwmnbCKMNBpKOWXm1WPoqSUcQl9T5hDH4HCb-S6riTbZMrh0xsGvx9YNvk_3GD4pbM_ZSePaSBeHPWMfjw_v98_54u3p5f5ukaNUesiFMGjcspFqXmqNJIUgBVRyUDz9SMxJaSkVN0ahUFjqBpqqkYjkFHeNnLHrfe4m9F8jxcGufURqW9dRP0abjDKN1FWSir00VYoxUGM3wa9d2FoOdofMruwOmd0hs8BtQpZMV4f8cbmm-s_yyygJbvcCSi2_PQUb0VOHVPuQsNm69__l_wAqnHwu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993993368</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microelectrode accuracy in deep brain stimulation surgery</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Brahimaj, Bledi ; Kochanski, Ryan B. ; Sani, Sepehr</creator><creatorcontrib>Brahimaj, Bledi ; Kochanski, Ryan B. ; Sani, Sepehr</creatorcontrib><description>•MER confirms the neurophysiological target in DBS surgery.•Until now, no prior studies have assessed the target accuracy of the microelectrode.•Microelectrode targeting is accurate within reasonable radial error. Microelectrode recording (MER) provides vital neurophysiological information about target nuclei during deep brain stimulation (DBS). There have been extensive studies looking at the accuracy of DBS lead placement; however, to date, no large series have assessed the accuracy of the microelectrode. In this study, we report the accuracy of microelectrode tip placement in comparison to preoperatively planned radiographic target. Patients who underwent DBS with MER from 2014 to 2016 were included in the study. At the authors’ institution, intra-operative CT (iCT) is routinely performed after the first microelectrode track to confirm tip accuracy. Retrospective analysis of microelectrode track error was calculated between the planned trajectory and the microelectrode tip. The radial error was calculated on the same axial plane using the Euclidian distance formula, and multivariate analysis was performed to ascertain any directional bias of error. A total of 227 microelectrode tracks were analyzed, (150 STN, 50 ViM, 27 GPi) yielding a total radial error of 1.2 mm ± 0.2 SEM across all targets. Analysis of vector error distribution revealed lack of directional bias. MER is an accurate electrophysiological representation of the planned target.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0967-5868</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.01.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29396073</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Deep brain stimulation ; Intraoperative CT ; Intraoperative imaging ; Microelectrode recording ; Stereotactic targeting</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical neuroscience, 2018-04, Vol.50, p.58-61</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-229c9abf354766ce322e50e71051229e24e563351995c25c76f0f8f3ccea51af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-229c9abf354766ce322e50e71051229e24e563351995c25c76f0f8f3ccea51af3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7081-8818</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29396073$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brahimaj, Bledi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kochanski, Ryan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sani, Sepehr</creatorcontrib><title>Microelectrode accuracy in deep brain stimulation surgery</title><title>Journal of clinical neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Clin Neurosci</addtitle><description>•MER confirms the neurophysiological target in DBS surgery.•Until now, no prior studies have assessed the target accuracy of the microelectrode.•Microelectrode targeting is accurate within reasonable radial error. Microelectrode recording (MER) provides vital neurophysiological information about target nuclei during deep brain stimulation (DBS). There have been extensive studies looking at the accuracy of DBS lead placement; however, to date, no large series have assessed the accuracy of the microelectrode. In this study, we report the accuracy of microelectrode tip placement in comparison to preoperatively planned radiographic target. Patients who underwent DBS with MER from 2014 to 2016 were included in the study. At the authors’ institution, intra-operative CT (iCT) is routinely performed after the first microelectrode track to confirm tip accuracy. Retrospective analysis of microelectrode track error was calculated between the planned trajectory and the microelectrode tip. The radial error was calculated on the same axial plane using the Euclidian distance formula, and multivariate analysis was performed to ascertain any directional bias of error. A total of 227 microelectrode tracks were analyzed, (150 STN, 50 ViM, 27 GPi) yielding a total radial error of 1.2 mm ± 0.2 SEM across all targets. Analysis of vector error distribution revealed lack of directional bias. MER is an accurate electrophysiological representation of the planned target.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Deep brain stimulation</subject><subject>Intraoperative CT</subject><subject>Intraoperative imaging</subject><subject>Microelectrode recording</subject><subject>Stereotactic targeting</subject><issn>0967-5868</issn><issn>1532-2653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMotla_gAfZo5ddJ0mT3YAXEf9BxYueQzo7Kynb3ZrsCv32prR6FAZmYN578H6MXXIoOHB9sypWPXaFAF4VwAsQcMSmXEmRC63kMZuC0WWuKl1N2FmMKwAwcwmnbCKMNBpKOWXm1WPoqSUcQl9T5hDH4HCb-S6riTbZMrh0xsGvx9YNvk_3GD4pbM_ZSePaSBeHPWMfjw_v98_54u3p5f5ukaNUesiFMGjcspFqXmqNJIUgBVRyUDz9SMxJaSkVN0ahUFjqBpqqkYjkFHeNnLHrfe4m9F8jxcGufURqW9dRP0abjDKN1FWSir00VYoxUGM3wa9d2FoOdofMruwOmd0hs8BtQpZMV4f8cbmm-s_yyygJbvcCSi2_PQUb0VOHVPuQsNm69__l_wAqnHwu</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Brahimaj, Bledi</creator><creator>Kochanski, Ryan B.</creator><creator>Sani, Sepehr</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7081-8818</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Microelectrode accuracy in deep brain stimulation surgery</title><author>Brahimaj, Bledi ; Kochanski, Ryan B. ; Sani, Sepehr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-229c9abf354766ce322e50e71051229e24e563351995c25c76f0f8f3ccea51af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Deep brain stimulation</topic><topic>Intraoperative CT</topic><topic>Intraoperative imaging</topic><topic>Microelectrode recording</topic><topic>Stereotactic targeting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brahimaj, Bledi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kochanski, Ryan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sani, Sepehr</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brahimaj, Bledi</au><au>Kochanski, Ryan B.</au><au>Sani, Sepehr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microelectrode accuracy in deep brain stimulation surgery</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Neurosci</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>50</volume><spage>58</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>58-61</pages><issn>0967-5868</issn><eissn>1532-2653</eissn><abstract>•MER confirms the neurophysiological target in DBS surgery.•Until now, no prior studies have assessed the target accuracy of the microelectrode.•Microelectrode targeting is accurate within reasonable radial error. Microelectrode recording (MER) provides vital neurophysiological information about target nuclei during deep brain stimulation (DBS). There have been extensive studies looking at the accuracy of DBS lead placement; however, to date, no large series have assessed the accuracy of the microelectrode. In this study, we report the accuracy of microelectrode tip placement in comparison to preoperatively planned radiographic target. Patients who underwent DBS with MER from 2014 to 2016 were included in the study. At the authors’ institution, intra-operative CT (iCT) is routinely performed after the first microelectrode track to confirm tip accuracy. Retrospective analysis of microelectrode track error was calculated between the planned trajectory and the microelectrode tip. The radial error was calculated on the same axial plane using the Euclidian distance formula, and multivariate analysis was performed to ascertain any directional bias of error. A total of 227 microelectrode tracks were analyzed, (150 STN, 50 ViM, 27 GPi) yielding a total radial error of 1.2 mm ± 0.2 SEM across all targets. Analysis of vector error distribution revealed lack of directional bias. MER is an accurate electrophysiological representation of the planned target.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29396073</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jocn.2018.01.020</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7081-8818</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0967-5868
ispartof Journal of clinical neuroscience, 2018-04, Vol.50, p.58-61
issn 0967-5868
1532-2653
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1993993368
source Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)
subjects Accuracy
Deep brain stimulation
Intraoperative CT
Intraoperative imaging
Microelectrode recording
Stereotactic targeting
title Microelectrode accuracy in deep brain stimulation surgery
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A54%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microelectrode%20accuracy%20in%20deep%20brain%20stimulation%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20neuroscience&rft.au=Brahimaj,%20Bledi&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=50&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=58-61&rft.issn=0967-5868&rft.eissn=1532-2653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jocn.2018.01.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1993993368%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-229c9abf354766ce322e50e71051229e24e563351995c25c76f0f8f3ccea51af3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993993368&rft_id=info:pmid/29396073&rfr_iscdi=true