Loading…

Cultural Eutrophication in the Choptank and Patuxent Estuaries of Chesapeake Bay

The Choptank and Patuxent tributaries of Chesapeake Bay have become eutrophic over the last 50-100 years. Systematic monitoring of nutrient inputs began in ~1970, and there have been 2-5-fold increases in nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) inputs during 1970-2004 due to sewage discharges, fertilizer ap...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Limnology and oceanography 2006-01, Vol.51 (1), p.435-447
Main Authors: Fisher, T. R., J. D. Hagy III, Boynton, W. R., Williams, M. R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4805-f35ac378c0283ef6dc6d58ec3b50ca4ce4785ad262f2df7ca4b59d8455d4eff43
cites
container_end_page 447
container_issue 1
container_start_page 435
container_title Limnology and oceanography
container_volume 51
creator Fisher, T. R.
J. D. Hagy III
Boynton, W. R.
Williams, M. R.
description The Choptank and Patuxent tributaries of Chesapeake Bay have become eutrophic over the last 50-100 years. Systematic monitoring of nutrient inputs began in ~1970, and there have been 2-5-fold increases in nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) inputs during 1970-2004 due to sewage discharges, fertilizer applications, atmospheric deposition, and changes in land use. Hydrochemical modeling and land-use yield coefficients suggest that current input rates are 4-20 times higher for N and P than under forested conditions existing 350 yr ago. Sewage is a major cause of increased nutrients in the Patuxent; agricultural inputs dominate in the Choptank. These loading increases have caused three major water-quality problems: (1) increased nutrients, phytoplankton, and turbidity; (2) decreased submerged grasses due to higher turbidity and epiphyton shading; and (3) bottom-water hypoxia due to respiration of excess organic matter. Oxygen in the Patuxent is consistently $
doi_str_mv 10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0435
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19953961</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4499602</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4499602</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4805-f35ac378c0283ef6dc6d58ec3b50ca4ce4785ad262f2df7ca4b59d8455d4eff43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9v1DAQxS1EJZaWb8DBF7gl-N8k8bGstlBpRVeonK2pY2vTunGwHcF--2a1C1w5zWjm996THiGUs1pJrj-FWAvGmhp4zc2EqRhRMyXhFVlxLXUFoNlrsmJMqEou-xvyNudHxpgGgBXZredQ5oSBbuaS4rQfLJYhjnQYadk7ut7HqeD4RHHs6Q7L_NuNhW5ymTENLtPoF8RlnBw-OfoZD1fkwmPI7t15XpIfN5v79ddqe_fldn29rVB1DCovAa1sO8tEJ51vetv00DkrH4BZVNaptgPsRSO86H27nB5A950C6JXzXslL8vHkO6X4c3a5mOchWxcCji7O2XCtQeqGL2B3Am2KOSfnzZSGZ0wHw5k5VmhCNMcKDXDzp0JzrHCRfjhnYLYYfMLRDvmfvlWNbkEv3O2J-zUEd_hvf7P9dnd8AOe76-_34pz5_uT1mEtMf72U0rphQr4ApbyU5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19953961</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cultural Eutrophication in the Choptank and Patuxent Estuaries of Chesapeake Bay</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Fisher, T. R. ; J. D. Hagy III ; Boynton, W. R. ; Williams, M. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fisher, T. R. ; J. D. Hagy III ; Boynton, W. R. ; Williams, M. R.</creatorcontrib><description>The Choptank and Patuxent tributaries of Chesapeake Bay have become eutrophic over the last 50-100 years. Systematic monitoring of nutrient inputs began in ~1970, and there have been 2-5-fold increases in nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) inputs during 1970-2004 due to sewage discharges, fertilizer applications, atmospheric deposition, and changes in land use. Hydrochemical modeling and land-use yield coefficients suggest that current input rates are 4-20 times higher for N and P than under forested conditions existing 350 yr ago. Sewage is a major cause of increased nutrients in the Patuxent; agricultural inputs dominate in the Choptank. These loading increases have caused three major water-quality problems: (1) increased nutrients, phytoplankton, and turbidity; (2) decreased submerged grasses due to higher turbidity and epiphyton shading; and (3) bottom-water hypoxia due to respiration of excess organic matter. Oxygen in the Patuxent is consistently $&lt;3 mg L^{-1}$ in bottom waters in summer, whereas oxygen in Choptank bottom waters has been decreasing for the last 20 yr and is now approaching$3 mg L^{-1}$in wet years. The low N:P of sewage inputs to the Patuxent results in an N-limited, P-saturated system, whereas the Choptank is primarily limited by N, but with P limitation of phytoplankton during spring river flows. Insufficient action has been taken to improve the water and habitat quality of these estuaries, although reduced eutrophication in dry years suggests that both estuaries will respond to significant decreases in nutrients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-3590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5590</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0435</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LIOCAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Waco, TX: The American Society of Limnology and Oceanography</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brackish ; Brackish water ecosystems ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Estuaries ; Eutrophication ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fertilizers ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Geochemistry ; Groundwater ; Hypoxia ; Land use ; Marine and continental quaternary ; Mineralogy ; Nitrates ; Silicates ; Surface water ; Surficial geology ; Synecology ; Wastewater ; Water geochemistry ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Limnology and oceanography, 2006-01, Vol.51 (1), p.435-447</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc.</rights><rights>2006, by the Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4805-f35ac378c0283ef6dc6d58ec3b50ca4ce4785ad262f2df7ca4b59d8455d4eff43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17469759$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fisher, T. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J. D. Hagy III</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boynton, W. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, M. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Cultural Eutrophication in the Choptank and Patuxent Estuaries of Chesapeake Bay</title><title>Limnology and oceanography</title><description>The Choptank and Patuxent tributaries of Chesapeake Bay have become eutrophic over the last 50-100 years. Systematic monitoring of nutrient inputs began in ~1970, and there have been 2-5-fold increases in nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) inputs during 1970-2004 due to sewage discharges, fertilizer applications, atmospheric deposition, and changes in land use. Hydrochemical modeling and land-use yield coefficients suggest that current input rates are 4-20 times higher for N and P than under forested conditions existing 350 yr ago. Sewage is a major cause of increased nutrients in the Patuxent; agricultural inputs dominate in the Choptank. These loading increases have caused three major water-quality problems: (1) increased nutrients, phytoplankton, and turbidity; (2) decreased submerged grasses due to higher turbidity and epiphyton shading; and (3) bottom-water hypoxia due to respiration of excess organic matter. Oxygen in the Patuxent is consistently $&lt;3 mg L^{-1}$ in bottom waters in summer, whereas oxygen in Choptank bottom waters has been decreasing for the last 20 yr and is now approaching$3 mg L^{-1}$in wet years. The low N:P of sewage inputs to the Patuxent results in an N-limited, P-saturated system, whereas the Choptank is primarily limited by N, but with P limitation of phytoplankton during spring river flows. Insufficient action has been taken to improve the water and habitat quality of these estuaries, although reduced eutrophication in dry years suggests that both estuaries will respond to significant decreases in nutrients.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Brackish water ecosystems</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Hypoxia</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Marine and continental quaternary</subject><subject>Mineralogy</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Silicates</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Surficial geology</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Water geochemistry</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>0024-3590</issn><issn>1939-5590</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE9v1DAQxS1EJZaWb8DBF7gl-N8k8bGstlBpRVeonK2pY2vTunGwHcF--2a1C1w5zWjm996THiGUs1pJrj-FWAvGmhp4zc2EqRhRMyXhFVlxLXUFoNlrsmJMqEou-xvyNudHxpgGgBXZredQ5oSBbuaS4rQfLJYhjnQYadk7ut7HqeD4RHHs6Q7L_NuNhW5ymTENLtPoF8RlnBw-OfoZD1fkwmPI7t15XpIfN5v79ddqe_fldn29rVB1DCovAa1sO8tEJ51vetv00DkrH4BZVNaptgPsRSO86H27nB5A950C6JXzXslL8vHkO6X4c3a5mOchWxcCji7O2XCtQeqGL2B3Am2KOSfnzZSGZ0wHw5k5VmhCNMcKDXDzp0JzrHCRfjhnYLYYfMLRDvmfvlWNbkEv3O2J-zUEd_hvf7P9dnd8AOe76-_34pz5_uT1mEtMf72U0rphQr4ApbyU5A</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Fisher, T. R.</creator><creator>J. D. Hagy III</creator><creator>Boynton, W. R.</creator><creator>Williams, M. R.</creator><general>The American Society of Limnology and Oceanography</general><general>American Society of Limnology and Oceanography</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Cultural Eutrophication in the Choptank and Patuxent Estuaries of Chesapeake Bay</title><author>Fisher, T. R. ; J. D. Hagy III ; Boynton, W. R. ; Williams, M. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4805-f35ac378c0283ef6dc6d58ec3b50ca4ce4785ad262f2df7ca4b59d8455d4eff43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Brackish water ecosystems</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Hypoxia</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Marine and continental quaternary</topic><topic>Mineralogy</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Silicates</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Surficial geology</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Water geochemistry</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fisher, T. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J. D. Hagy III</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boynton, W. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, M. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Limnology and oceanography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fisher, T. R.</au><au>J. D. Hagy III</au><au>Boynton, W. R.</au><au>Williams, M. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cultural Eutrophication in the Choptank and Patuxent Estuaries of Chesapeake Bay</atitle><jtitle>Limnology and oceanography</jtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>447</epage><pages>435-447</pages><issn>0024-3590</issn><eissn>1939-5590</eissn><coden>LIOCAH</coden><abstract>The Choptank and Patuxent tributaries of Chesapeake Bay have become eutrophic over the last 50-100 years. Systematic monitoring of nutrient inputs began in ~1970, and there have been 2-5-fold increases in nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) inputs during 1970-2004 due to sewage discharges, fertilizer applications, atmospheric deposition, and changes in land use. Hydrochemical modeling and land-use yield coefficients suggest that current input rates are 4-20 times higher for N and P than under forested conditions existing 350 yr ago. Sewage is a major cause of increased nutrients in the Patuxent; agricultural inputs dominate in the Choptank. These loading increases have caused three major water-quality problems: (1) increased nutrients, phytoplankton, and turbidity; (2) decreased submerged grasses due to higher turbidity and epiphyton shading; and (3) bottom-water hypoxia due to respiration of excess organic matter. Oxygen in the Patuxent is consistently $&lt;3 mg L^{-1}$ in bottom waters in summer, whereas oxygen in Choptank bottom waters has been decreasing for the last 20 yr and is now approaching$3 mg L^{-1}$in wet years. The low N:P of sewage inputs to the Patuxent results in an N-limited, P-saturated system, whereas the Choptank is primarily limited by N, but with P limitation of phytoplankton during spring river flows. Insufficient action has been taken to improve the water and habitat quality of these estuaries, although reduced eutrophication in dry years suggests that both estuaries will respond to significant decreases in nutrients.</abstract><cop>Waco, TX</cop><pub>The American Society of Limnology and Oceanography</pub><doi>10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0435</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0024-3590
ispartof Limnology and oceanography, 2006-01, Vol.51 (1), p.435-447
issn 0024-3590
1939-5590
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19953961
source Wiley
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Brackish
Brackish water ecosystems
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Estuaries
Eutrophication
Exact sciences and technology
Fertilizers
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Geochemistry
Groundwater
Hypoxia
Land use
Marine and continental quaternary
Mineralogy
Nitrates
Silicates
Surface water
Surficial geology
Synecology
Wastewater
Water geochemistry
Watersheds
title Cultural Eutrophication in the Choptank and Patuxent Estuaries of Chesapeake Bay
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A53%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cultural%20Eutrophication%20in%20the%20Choptank%20and%20Patuxent%20Estuaries%20of%20Chesapeake%20Bay&rft.jtitle=Limnology%20and%20oceanography&rft.au=Fisher,%20T.%20R.&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=447&rft.pages=435-447&rft.issn=0024-3590&rft.eissn=1939-5590&rft.coden=LIOCAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0435&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4499602%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4805-f35ac378c0283ef6dc6d58ec3b50ca4ce4785ad262f2df7ca4b59d8455d4eff43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19953961&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4499602&rfr_iscdi=true