How does sagittal imbalance affect the appropriateness of surgical indications and selection of procedure in the treatment of degenerative scoliosis? Findings from the RAND/UCLA Appropriate Use Criteria study

• Published in: The spine journal 2018-05, Vol.18 (5), p.900-911
• Main Authors: Daubs, Michael D., Brara, Harsimran S., Raaen, Laura B., Chen, Peggy Guey-Chi, Anderson, Ashaunta T., Asch, Steven M., Nuckols, Teryl K.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Appropriate use criteria; Appropriateness; Clinical Decision-Making; Deformity correction; Degenerative lumbar scoliosis; Humans; Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging; Lumbar Vertebrae - pathology; Outcomes; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Quality of care; Sagittal imbalance; Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging; Scoliosis - surgery; Spinal Fusion - methods; Spinal Fusion - standards; Surgical decision-making
• ISSN: 1529-9430; 1878-1632
• DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.027

Degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) is often associated with sagittal imbalance, which may affect patients' health outcomes before and after surgery. The appropriateness of surgery and preferred operative approaches has not been examined in detail for patients with DLS and sagittal imbalance. The goals of this article were to describe what is currently known about the relationship between sagittal imbalance and health outcomes among patients with DLS and to determine how indications for surgery in patients with DLS differ when sagittal imbalance is present. This study included a literature review and an expert panel using the RAND/University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Appropriateness Method. To develop appropriate use criteria for DLS, researchers at the RAND Corporation recently employed the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, which involves a systematic review of the literature and multidisciplinary expert panel process. Experts reviewed a synopsis of published literature and rated the appropriateness of five common operative approaches for 260 different clinical scenarios. In the present work, we updated the literature review and compared panelists' ratings in scenarios where imbalance was present versus absent. This work was funded by the Collaborative Spine Research Foundation, a group of surgical specialty societies and device manufacturers. On the basis of 13 eligible studies that examined sagittal imbalance and outcomes in patients with DLS, imbalance was associated with worse functional status in the absence of surgery and worse symptoms and complications postoperatively. Panelists' ratings demonstrated a consistent pattern across the diverse clinical scenarios. In general, when imbalance was present, surgery was more likely to be appropriate or necessary, including in some situations where surgery would otherwise be inappropriate. For patients with moderate to severe symptoms and imbalance, a deformity correction procedure was usually appropriate and frequently necessary, except in some patients with severe risk factors for complications. Conversely, procedures that did not correct imbalance, when present, were usually inappropriate. Clinical experts agreed that sagittal imbalance is a major factor affecting both when surgery is appropriate and which type of procedure is preferred among patients with DLS.