Loading…

Dynamic versus steady-state approaches to evaluate irrigation management of saline waters

A general tend exists toward increasing the salt concentration of surface and ground waters in the arid and semi-arid regions of the world. Quantitative knowledge on the interaction between irrigation management and crop yield is becoming increasingly important as water salinities increase. This inf...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agricultural water management 2007-07, Vol.91 (1), p.1-10
Main Authors: Letey, J., Feng, G.L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-6d2498b390b46e6860c57e6c0c4f438f21c9700bfbf976efda7eba71c63b639f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-6d2498b390b46e6860c57e6c0c4f438f21c9700bfbf976efda7eba71c63b639f3
container_end_page 10
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Agricultural water management
container_volume 91
creator Letey, J.
Feng, G.L.
description A general tend exists toward increasing the salt concentration of surface and ground waters in the arid and semi-arid regions of the world. Quantitative knowledge on the interaction between irrigation management and crop yield is becoming increasingly important as water salinities increase. This information is important to the farmer, water resource managers, and to regulatory agencies that might be considering imposing saline water quality standards for streams specifically designed to be protective of agricultural production. The initial guidelines for managing saline irrigation waters, which are still extensively used, were based on steady-state analyses. Subsequently, with the increased knowledge of the physical–chemical–biological interactions that occur in the soil-water–plant matrix, and the advent of high-speed computers, models have been developed that take into account the dynamic interactions. A comparison between two steady-state models and a transient-state model for the calculated ratio of applied saline water to potential evapotranspiration that produced a specific relative yield of corn ( Zea mays L.) revealed that a much lower water application is prescribed by the transient-state model. The effects of rain can be quantified by the transient-state models, and can be approximated by calculating the weighted average water salinity of the rainfall and irrigation waters. The steady-state analyses generally over predict the negative consequences of irrigating with saline waters. Irrigation guidelines based on steady-state analyses should be revised using more advanced knowledge.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.agwat.2007.02.014
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19992865</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378377407000674</els_id><sourcerecordid>14810092</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-6d2498b390b46e6860c57e6c0c4f438f21c9700bfbf976efda7eba71c63b639f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkT2P1DAQhiMEEsvBL6AgDXQJ49hrOwUFOr5OOokCrqCyJs54z6t8YXsX7b_HuzlBB4XH1uh5x69fF8VLBjUDJt_ua9z9wlQ3AKqGpgYmHhUbphWvmkbzx8UGuNIVV0o8LZ7FuAcAAUJtih8fThOO3pZHCvEQy5gI-1MVEyYqcVnCjPaeYpnmko44HM5tH4LfYfLzVI444Y5GmlI5uzLi4Ccqs5M87HnxxOEQ6cXDflXcffr4_fpLdfv18831-9vKbrcsVbJvRKs73kInJEktwW4VSQtWOMG1a5htFUDnOtcqSa5HRR0qZiXvJG8dvyrerHOz158HismMPloaBpxoPkTD2rZttNz-HxSaAbRNBvkK2jDHGMiZJfgRw8kwMOe8zd5c8jbnvA00JuedVTerKtBC9o-EiHDnz_DRcGxZLqe8LkqOPq_cynW5nPIF92nMs14_WMVocXABJ-vjXxtaK8mFytyrlXM4Z0shM3ffGmAcQIOQWmfi3UpQ_oKjp2Ci9TRZ6n0gm0w_-3--6jes77qP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14810092</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic versus steady-state approaches to evaluate irrigation management of saline waters</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Letey, J. ; Feng, G.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Letey, J. ; Feng, G.L.</creatorcontrib><description>A general tend exists toward increasing the salt concentration of surface and ground waters in the arid and semi-arid regions of the world. Quantitative knowledge on the interaction between irrigation management and crop yield is becoming increasingly important as water salinities increase. This information is important to the farmer, water resource managers, and to regulatory agencies that might be considering imposing saline water quality standards for streams specifically designed to be protective of agricultural production. The initial guidelines for managing saline irrigation waters, which are still extensively used, were based on steady-state analyses. Subsequently, with the increased knowledge of the physical–chemical–biological interactions that occur in the soil-water–plant matrix, and the advent of high-speed computers, models have been developed that take into account the dynamic interactions. A comparison between two steady-state models and a transient-state model for the calculated ratio of applied saline water to potential evapotranspiration that produced a specific relative yield of corn ( Zea mays L.) revealed that a much lower water application is prescribed by the transient-state model. The effects of rain can be quantified by the transient-state models, and can be approximated by calculating the weighted average water salinity of the rainfall and irrigation waters. The steady-state analyses generally over predict the negative consequences of irrigating with saline waters. Irrigation guidelines based on steady-state analyses should be revised using more advanced knowledge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-3774</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2007.02.014</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AWMADF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; corn ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; grain yield ; groundwater ; Irrigation guidelines ; irrigation management ; irrigation requirement ; irrigation scheduling ; irrigation water ; Irrigation. Drainage ; leaching ; Leaching fraction ; literature reviews ; rain ; saline water ; Salinity ; Salinity models ; simulation models ; soil water ; soil-plant interactions ; steady-state models ; surface water ; transient-state models ; Water quality ; water salinization ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Agricultural water management, 2007-07, Vol.91 (1), p.1-10</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-6d2498b390b46e6860c57e6c0c4f438f21c9700bfbf976efda7eba71c63b639f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-6d2498b390b46e6860c57e6c0c4f438f21c9700bfbf976efda7eba71c63b639f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377407000674$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18876347$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeagiwat/v_3a91_3ay_3a2007_3ai_3a1-3_3ap_3a1-10.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Letey, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, G.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic versus steady-state approaches to evaluate irrigation management of saline waters</title><title>Agricultural water management</title><description>A general tend exists toward increasing the salt concentration of surface and ground waters in the arid and semi-arid regions of the world. Quantitative knowledge on the interaction between irrigation management and crop yield is becoming increasingly important as water salinities increase. This information is important to the farmer, water resource managers, and to regulatory agencies that might be considering imposing saline water quality standards for streams specifically designed to be protective of agricultural production. The initial guidelines for managing saline irrigation waters, which are still extensively used, were based on steady-state analyses. Subsequently, with the increased knowledge of the physical–chemical–biological interactions that occur in the soil-water–plant matrix, and the advent of high-speed computers, models have been developed that take into account the dynamic interactions. A comparison between two steady-state models and a transient-state model for the calculated ratio of applied saline water to potential evapotranspiration that produced a specific relative yield of corn ( Zea mays L.) revealed that a much lower water application is prescribed by the transient-state model. The effects of rain can be quantified by the transient-state models, and can be approximated by calculating the weighted average water salinity of the rainfall and irrigation waters. The steady-state analyses generally over predict the negative consequences of irrigating with saline waters. Irrigation guidelines based on steady-state analyses should be revised using more advanced knowledge.</description><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>corn</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>grain yield</subject><subject>groundwater</subject><subject>Irrigation guidelines</subject><subject>irrigation management</subject><subject>irrigation requirement</subject><subject>irrigation scheduling</subject><subject>irrigation water</subject><subject>Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>leaching</subject><subject>Leaching fraction</subject><subject>literature reviews</subject><subject>rain</subject><subject>saline water</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Salinity models</subject><subject>simulation models</subject><subject>soil water</subject><subject>soil-plant interactions</subject><subject>steady-state models</subject><subject>surface water</subject><subject>transient-state models</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>water salinization</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0378-3774</issn><issn>1873-2283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkT2P1DAQhiMEEsvBL6AgDXQJ49hrOwUFOr5OOokCrqCyJs54z6t8YXsX7b_HuzlBB4XH1uh5x69fF8VLBjUDJt_ua9z9wlQ3AKqGpgYmHhUbphWvmkbzx8UGuNIVV0o8LZ7FuAcAAUJtih8fThOO3pZHCvEQy5gI-1MVEyYqcVnCjPaeYpnmko44HM5tH4LfYfLzVI444Y5GmlI5uzLi4Ccqs5M87HnxxOEQ6cXDflXcffr4_fpLdfv18831-9vKbrcsVbJvRKs73kInJEktwW4VSQtWOMG1a5htFUDnOtcqSa5HRR0qZiXvJG8dvyrerHOz158HismMPloaBpxoPkTD2rZttNz-HxSaAbRNBvkK2jDHGMiZJfgRw8kwMOe8zd5c8jbnvA00JuedVTerKtBC9o-EiHDnz_DRcGxZLqe8LkqOPq_cynW5nPIF92nMs14_WMVocXABJ-vjXxtaK8mFytyrlXM4Z0shM3ffGmAcQIOQWmfi3UpQ_oKjp2Ci9TRZ6n0gm0w_-3--6jes77qP</recordid><startdate>20070716</startdate><enddate>20070716</enddate><creator>Letey, J.</creator><creator>Feng, G.L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070716</creationdate><title>Dynamic versus steady-state approaches to evaluate irrigation management of saline waters</title><author>Letey, J. ; Feng, G.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-6d2498b390b46e6860c57e6c0c4f438f21c9700bfbf976efda7eba71c63b639f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>corn</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>grain yield</topic><topic>groundwater</topic><topic>Irrigation guidelines</topic><topic>irrigation management</topic><topic>irrigation requirement</topic><topic>irrigation scheduling</topic><topic>irrigation water</topic><topic>Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>leaching</topic><topic>Leaching fraction</topic><topic>literature reviews</topic><topic>rain</topic><topic>saline water</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Salinity models</topic><topic>simulation models</topic><topic>soil water</topic><topic>soil-plant interactions</topic><topic>steady-state models</topic><topic>surface water</topic><topic>transient-state models</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>water salinization</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Letey, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, G.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Agricultural water management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Letey, J.</au><au>Feng, G.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic versus steady-state approaches to evaluate irrigation management of saline waters</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural water management</jtitle><date>2007-07-16</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>0378-3774</issn><eissn>1873-2283</eissn><coden>AWMADF</coden><abstract>A general tend exists toward increasing the salt concentration of surface and ground waters in the arid and semi-arid regions of the world. Quantitative knowledge on the interaction between irrigation management and crop yield is becoming increasingly important as water salinities increase. This information is important to the farmer, water resource managers, and to regulatory agencies that might be considering imposing saline water quality standards for streams specifically designed to be protective of agricultural production. The initial guidelines for managing saline irrigation waters, which are still extensively used, were based on steady-state analyses. Subsequently, with the increased knowledge of the physical–chemical–biological interactions that occur in the soil-water–plant matrix, and the advent of high-speed computers, models have been developed that take into account the dynamic interactions. A comparison between two steady-state models and a transient-state model for the calculated ratio of applied saline water to potential evapotranspiration that produced a specific relative yield of corn ( Zea mays L.) revealed that a much lower water application is prescribed by the transient-state model. The effects of rain can be quantified by the transient-state models, and can be approximated by calculating the weighted average water salinity of the rainfall and irrigation waters. The steady-state analyses generally over predict the negative consequences of irrigating with saline waters. Irrigation guidelines based on steady-state analyses should be revised using more advanced knowledge.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agwat.2007.02.014</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-3774
ispartof Agricultural water management, 2007-07, Vol.91 (1), p.1-10
issn 0378-3774
1873-2283
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19992865
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
corn
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
grain yield
groundwater
Irrigation guidelines
irrigation management
irrigation requirement
irrigation scheduling
irrigation water
Irrigation. Drainage
leaching
Leaching fraction
literature reviews
rain
saline water
Salinity
Salinity models
simulation models
soil water
soil-plant interactions
steady-state models
surface water
transient-state models
Water quality
water salinization
Zea mays
title Dynamic versus steady-state approaches to evaluate irrigation management of saline waters
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T08%3A09%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20versus%20steady-state%20approaches%20to%20evaluate%20irrigation%20management%20of%20saline%20waters&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20water%20management&rft.au=Letey,%20J.&rft.date=2007-07-16&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=0378-3774&rft.eissn=1873-2283&rft.coden=AWMADF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agwat.2007.02.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14810092%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c551t-6d2498b390b46e6860c57e6c0c4f438f21c9700bfbf976efda7eba71c63b639f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14810092&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true