Loading…

Are leprosy case numbers reliable?

The NCDR for a country was almost always higher than the point prevalence rate because patients with paucibacillary leprosy who were entered into the system early during the year would complete their treatment and not be included in the number of registered patients at the end of the year. [...]in 2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Lancet infectious diseases 2018-02, Vol.18 (2), p.135-137
Main Authors: Salgado, Claudio Guedes, Barreto, Josafá Gonçalves, da Silva, Moisés Batista, Goulart, Isabela Maria Bernardes, Barreto, Jaison Antônio, de Medeiros Junior, Nesio Fernandes, Nery, José Augusto, Frade, Marco Andrey Cipriani, Spencer, John Stewart
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-31ec87e03da790485f4e1a61e3558f90be855b30747d67807439527307ea07993
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-31ec87e03da790485f4e1a61e3558f90be855b30747d67807439527307ea07993
container_end_page 137
container_issue 2
container_start_page 135
container_title The Lancet infectious diseases
container_volume 18
creator Salgado, Claudio Guedes
Barreto, Josafá Gonçalves
da Silva, Moisés Batista
Goulart, Isabela Maria Bernardes
Barreto, Jaison Antônio
de Medeiros Junior, Nesio Fernandes
Nery, José Augusto
Frade, Marco Andrey Cipriani
Spencer, John Stewart
description The NCDR for a country was almost always higher than the point prevalence rate because patients with paucibacillary leprosy who were entered into the system early during the year would complete their treatment and not be included in the number of registered patients at the end of the year. [...]in 2016, 214 783 new cases were detected, whereas only 171 948 individuals were registered for prevalence at the end of the year. In Brazil, the only country that has still not attained the goal of fewer than one new case per 10 000, surveys by several leprologists who use active surveillance of schoolchildren and their household contacts reveal more hidden cases than the national NCDR reported through passive case diagnosis, including in areas of the country considered as having low endemicity,5,6 and thousands of hidden cases have been found in India.7 These findings illustrate the importance of active surveillance and additional case-finding among the household contacts of newly diagnosed cases by experienced dermatologists. Global situation, Wkly Epidemiol Rec, Vol. 77, 2002, 1-8 3 WHO, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Report on the regional seminar on future trends in leprosy elimination, 2000, World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Alexandria 4 WHO, Regional Office for Africa, Progress towards the reduction of the burden of leprosy 2000-2011, 2012, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville 5 MAC Frade, NA de Paula, CM Gomes, Unexpectedly high leprosy seroprevalence detected using a random surveillance strategy in midwestern Brazil: a comparison of ELISA and a rapid diagnostic test, PLoS Negl Trop Dis, Vol. 11, 2017, e0005375 6 FB Filho, NA De Paula, MN Leite, Evidence of hidden leprosy in a supposedly low endemic area of Brazil, Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Vol. 112, 2017, 1-7 7 WHO, Oct 18, 2016, (accessed Sept 25, 2017).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30012-4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1999681077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1473309918300124</els_id><sourcerecordid>2426515688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-31ec87e03da790485f4e1a61e3558f90be855b30747d67807439527307ea07993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMlKA0EQhhtRTFweQRn0Eg-jXb1Md59CCG4Q8KCem1lqYMIssTsj5O3tZKIHD3qqoviq6ucj5ALoLVBI7l5BKB5zaswE9A2nFFgsDsg4jEUshFSHu35ARuTE-2VgFFBxTEbMCGBG8jG5mjmMaly5zm-iPPUYtX2TofORw7pKsxqnZ-SoTGuP5_t6St4f7t_mT_Hi5fF5PlvEuWCwjjlgrhVSXqTKUKFlKRDSBJBLqUtDM9RSZpwqoYpE6VC5kUyFAaZUGcNPyWS4G8J89OjXtql8jnWdttj13oIxJtFAlQro9S902fWuDeksEyyRIBOt_6QoVZKFBCJQcqDy4MA7LO3KVU3qNhao3aq2O9V269GCtjvVdrt3ub_eZw0WP1vfbgMwHQAM0j4rdNbnFbY5FpXDfG2LrvrnxRfhwohi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2007524394</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are leprosy case numbers reliable?</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Salgado, Claudio Guedes ; Barreto, Josafá Gonçalves ; da Silva, Moisés Batista ; Goulart, Isabela Maria Bernardes ; Barreto, Jaison Antônio ; de Medeiros Junior, Nesio Fernandes ; Nery, José Augusto ; Frade, Marco Andrey Cipriani ; Spencer, John Stewart</creator><creatorcontrib>Salgado, Claudio Guedes ; Barreto, Josafá Gonçalves ; da Silva, Moisés Batista ; Goulart, Isabela Maria Bernardes ; Barreto, Jaison Antônio ; de Medeiros Junior, Nesio Fernandes ; Nery, José Augusto ; Frade, Marco Andrey Cipriani ; Spencer, John Stewart</creatorcontrib><description>The NCDR for a country was almost always higher than the point prevalence rate because patients with paucibacillary leprosy who were entered into the system early during the year would complete their treatment and not be included in the number of registered patients at the end of the year. [...]in 2016, 214 783 new cases were detected, whereas only 171 948 individuals were registered for prevalence at the end of the year. In Brazil, the only country that has still not attained the goal of fewer than one new case per 10 000, surveys by several leprologists who use active surveillance of schoolchildren and their household contacts reveal more hidden cases than the national NCDR reported through passive case diagnosis, including in areas of the country considered as having low endemicity,5,6 and thousands of hidden cases have been found in India.7 These findings illustrate the importance of active surveillance and additional case-finding among the household contacts of newly diagnosed cases by experienced dermatologists. Global situation, Wkly Epidemiol Rec, Vol. 77, 2002, 1-8 3 WHO, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Report on the regional seminar on future trends in leprosy elimination, 2000, World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Alexandria 4 WHO, Regional Office for Africa, Progress towards the reduction of the burden of leprosy 2000-2011, 2012, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville 5 MAC Frade, NA de Paula, CM Gomes, Unexpectedly high leprosy seroprevalence detected using a random surveillance strategy in midwestern Brazil: a comparison of ELISA and a rapid diagnostic test, PLoS Negl Trop Dis, Vol. 11, 2017, e0005375 6 FB Filho, NA De Paula, MN Leite, Evidence of hidden leprosy in a supposedly low endemic area of Brazil, Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Vol. 112, 2017, 1-7 7 WHO, Oct 18, 2016, (accessed Sept 25, 2017).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-3099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-4457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30012-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29412953</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Epidemiologic Methods ; Humans ; Incidence ; Infectious diseases ; Leprosy ; Leprosy - epidemiology ; Population ; Prevalence ; Serology ; Surveillance ; World Health Organization</subject><ispartof>The Lancet infectious diseases, 2018-02, Vol.18 (2), p.135-137</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Feb 1, 2018</rights><rights>2018. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-31ec87e03da790485f4e1a61e3558f90be855b30747d67807439527307ea07993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-31ec87e03da790485f4e1a61e3558f90be855b30747d67807439527307ea07993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29412953$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salgado, Claudio Guedes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barreto, Josafá Gonçalves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Moisés Batista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goulart, Isabela Maria Bernardes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barreto, Jaison Antônio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Medeiros Junior, Nesio Fernandes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nery, José Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frade, Marco Andrey Cipriani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, John Stewart</creatorcontrib><title>Are leprosy case numbers reliable?</title><title>The Lancet infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Lancet Infect Dis</addtitle><description>The NCDR for a country was almost always higher than the point prevalence rate because patients with paucibacillary leprosy who were entered into the system early during the year would complete their treatment and not be included in the number of registered patients at the end of the year. [...]in 2016, 214 783 new cases were detected, whereas only 171 948 individuals were registered for prevalence at the end of the year. In Brazil, the only country that has still not attained the goal of fewer than one new case per 10 000, surveys by several leprologists who use active surveillance of schoolchildren and their household contacts reveal more hidden cases than the national NCDR reported through passive case diagnosis, including in areas of the country considered as having low endemicity,5,6 and thousands of hidden cases have been found in India.7 These findings illustrate the importance of active surveillance and additional case-finding among the household contacts of newly diagnosed cases by experienced dermatologists. Global situation, Wkly Epidemiol Rec, Vol. 77, 2002, 1-8 3 WHO, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Report on the regional seminar on future trends in leprosy elimination, 2000, World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Alexandria 4 WHO, Regional Office for Africa, Progress towards the reduction of the burden of leprosy 2000-2011, 2012, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville 5 MAC Frade, NA de Paula, CM Gomes, Unexpectedly high leprosy seroprevalence detected using a random surveillance strategy in midwestern Brazil: a comparison of ELISA and a rapid diagnostic test, PLoS Negl Trop Dis, Vol. 11, 2017, e0005375 6 FB Filho, NA De Paula, MN Leite, Evidence of hidden leprosy in a supposedly low endemic area of Brazil, Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Vol. 112, 2017, 1-7 7 WHO, Oct 18, 2016, (accessed Sept 25, 2017).</description><subject>Epidemiologic Methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Leprosy</subject><subject>Leprosy - epidemiology</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Serology</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>World Health Organization</subject><issn>1473-3099</issn><issn>1474-4457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMlKA0EQhhtRTFweQRn0Eg-jXb1Md59CCG4Q8KCem1lqYMIssTsj5O3tZKIHD3qqoviq6ucj5ALoLVBI7l5BKB5zaswE9A2nFFgsDsg4jEUshFSHu35ARuTE-2VgFFBxTEbMCGBG8jG5mjmMaly5zm-iPPUYtX2TofORw7pKsxqnZ-SoTGuP5_t6St4f7t_mT_Hi5fF5PlvEuWCwjjlgrhVSXqTKUKFlKRDSBJBLqUtDM9RSZpwqoYpE6VC5kUyFAaZUGcNPyWS4G8J89OjXtql8jnWdttj13oIxJtFAlQro9S902fWuDeksEyyRIBOt_6QoVZKFBCJQcqDy4MA7LO3KVU3qNhao3aq2O9V269GCtjvVdrt3ub_eZw0WP1vfbgMwHQAM0j4rdNbnFbY5FpXDfG2LrvrnxRfhwohi</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Salgado, Claudio Guedes</creator><creator>Barreto, Josafá Gonçalves</creator><creator>da Silva, Moisés Batista</creator><creator>Goulart, Isabela Maria Bernardes</creator><creator>Barreto, Jaison Antônio</creator><creator>de Medeiros Junior, Nesio Fernandes</creator><creator>Nery, José Augusto</creator><creator>Frade, Marco Andrey Cipriani</creator><creator>Spencer, John Stewart</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Are leprosy case numbers reliable?</title><author>Salgado, Claudio Guedes ; Barreto, Josafá Gonçalves ; da Silva, Moisés Batista ; Goulart, Isabela Maria Bernardes ; Barreto, Jaison Antônio ; de Medeiros Junior, Nesio Fernandes ; Nery, José Augusto ; Frade, Marco Andrey Cipriani ; Spencer, John Stewart</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-31ec87e03da790485f4e1a61e3558f90be855b30747d67807439527307ea07993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Epidemiologic Methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Leprosy</topic><topic>Leprosy - epidemiology</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Serology</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>World Health Organization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salgado, Claudio Guedes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barreto, Josafá Gonçalves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Moisés Batista</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goulart, Isabela Maria Bernardes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barreto, Jaison Antônio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Medeiros Junior, Nesio Fernandes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nery, José Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frade, Marco Andrey Cipriani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, John Stewart</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salgado, Claudio Guedes</au><au>Barreto, Josafá Gonçalves</au><au>da Silva, Moisés Batista</au><au>Goulart, Isabela Maria Bernardes</au><au>Barreto, Jaison Antônio</au><au>de Medeiros Junior, Nesio Fernandes</au><au>Nery, José Augusto</au><au>Frade, Marco Andrey Cipriani</au><au>Spencer, John Stewart</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are leprosy case numbers reliable?</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>137</epage><pages>135-137</pages><issn>1473-3099</issn><eissn>1474-4457</eissn><abstract>The NCDR for a country was almost always higher than the point prevalence rate because patients with paucibacillary leprosy who were entered into the system early during the year would complete their treatment and not be included in the number of registered patients at the end of the year. [...]in 2016, 214 783 new cases were detected, whereas only 171 948 individuals were registered for prevalence at the end of the year. In Brazil, the only country that has still not attained the goal of fewer than one new case per 10 000, surveys by several leprologists who use active surveillance of schoolchildren and their household contacts reveal more hidden cases than the national NCDR reported through passive case diagnosis, including in areas of the country considered as having low endemicity,5,6 and thousands of hidden cases have been found in India.7 These findings illustrate the importance of active surveillance and additional case-finding among the household contacts of newly diagnosed cases by experienced dermatologists. Global situation, Wkly Epidemiol Rec, Vol. 77, 2002, 1-8 3 WHO, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Report on the regional seminar on future trends in leprosy elimination, 2000, World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Alexandria 4 WHO, Regional Office for Africa, Progress towards the reduction of the burden of leprosy 2000-2011, 2012, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville 5 MAC Frade, NA de Paula, CM Gomes, Unexpectedly high leprosy seroprevalence detected using a random surveillance strategy in midwestern Brazil: a comparison of ELISA and a rapid diagnostic test, PLoS Negl Trop Dis, Vol. 11, 2017, e0005375 6 FB Filho, NA De Paula, MN Leite, Evidence of hidden leprosy in a supposedly low endemic area of Brazil, Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Vol. 112, 2017, 1-7 7 WHO, Oct 18, 2016, (accessed Sept 25, 2017).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29412953</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30012-4</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1473-3099
ispartof The Lancet infectious diseases, 2018-02, Vol.18 (2), p.135-137
issn 1473-3099
1474-4457
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1999681077
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Epidemiologic Methods
Humans
Incidence
Infectious diseases
Leprosy
Leprosy - epidemiology
Population
Prevalence
Serology
Surveillance
World Health Organization
title Are leprosy case numbers reliable?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T01%3A22%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20leprosy%20case%20numbers%20reliable?&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Salgado,%20Claudio%20Guedes&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=137&rft.pages=135-137&rft.issn=1473-3099&rft.eissn=1474-4457&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30012-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2426515688%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-31ec87e03da790485f4e1a61e3558f90be855b30747d67807439527307ea07993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2007524394&rft_id=info:pmid/29412953&rfr_iscdi=true