Loading…
A review of nursery production systems and their influence on urban tree survival
•Nursery production systems impact plant development and root architecture.•Production systems influence post-transplant tree survival.•Production systems influence planting practices.•Planting depth impacts stem-girdling root formation.•Production practices may alter drought stress tolerance and pe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Urban forestry & urban greening 2017-01, Vol.21, p.183-191 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Nursery production systems impact plant development and root architecture.•Production systems influence post-transplant tree survival.•Production systems influence planting practices.•Planting depth impacts stem-girdling root formation.•Production practices may alter drought stress tolerance and pest susceptibility.
Urban trees face a myriad of complex challenges growing in the built environment. The most common environmental conditions influencing urban tree mortality are water availability, nutrient deficiency and soil compaction. Long-term survival of recently installed trees has been directly attributed to site conditions, planting technique, and post-transplant maintenance. Tree survival is also dependent on selection of healthy, suitable plant material. Production methods for woody plants include traditional plastic containers (CG), pot-in-pot containers (PIP), and in-ground fabric containers (IGF). Field grown trees may be produced as bare-root (BR) or root ball-excavated and burlap-wrapped (B&B) trees. Each of these methods offers unique advantages in relation to production and installation. Many of the studies reviewed reveal varying post-transplant establishment and survival responses to production methods at a species-specific level. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1618-8667 1610-8167 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.12.002 |