Significant and safe reduction of propofol sedation dose for geriatric population undergoing pacemaker implantation: randomized clinical trial

• Published in: Aging clinical and experimental research 2018-10, Vol.30 (10), p.1233-1239
• Main Authors: Hernandez-Perez, Ana Luisa, Gallardo-Hernandez, Ana Gabriela, Ordoñez-Espinosa, German, Martinez-Carrillo, Beatriz, Bermudez-Ochoa, Manuel Gerardo, Revilla-Monsalve, Cristina, Sanchez-Lopez, Jose Antonio, Saturno-Chiu, Guillemo, Leder, Ronald
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthesia; Conscious Sedation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Geriatrics; Geriatrics/Gerontology; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration & dosage; Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original Article; Pacemaker, Artificial; Patients; Propofol - administration & dosage; Propofol - adverse effects; Prosthesis Implantation
• ISSN: 1720-8319; 1594-0667; 1720-8319
• DOI: 10.1007/s40520-018-0914-0

Objective A previous multidisciplinary pilot study based on computer simulations for the geriatric population showed that a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/h of propofol could sedate patients older than 65 for pacemaker implantation. The present study validates that the pacemaker implantation can be done in the elderly using 0.5–1 mg/kg/h of propofol with hemodynamic stability. Methods 66 patients from 65 to 88 years old scheduled for pacemaker implantation were randomly assigned one of three doses of propofol. The first group received 2 mg/kg/h of propofol (P2) that is within normal range of the sedation dose. The second group received 1 mg/kg/h (P1) dose and the third group received the dose of 0.5 mg/kg/h (P0.5) according to the simulation-predicted dose for geriatric populations. Results All patients kept MAP between 76 and 85 mmHg, with no hypotension episodes in any of the groups; therefore, they were all hemodynamically stable during the procedure. BIS was between 80 and 65 during the pacemaker implantation for the three groups, BIS of group P2 was significantly lower than the other groups. BIS in groups P1 and P0.5 was within the appropriated range for moderate sedation. Brice was positive for auditory recalls only when there was arousing noise in the operating room. Conclusions Moderate sedation, adequate for pacemaker implantation, can be achieved infusing 0.5–1 mg/kg/h of propofol in elderly patients when the patient has proper analgesia management at the device implantation site. The second important condition is to avoid unnecessary and alerting auditory and mechanical stimuli in the operating room, so that the patient will remain calm.