Reduced variability of visual left ventricular ejection fraction assessment with reference images: The Japanese Association of Young Echocardiography Fellows multicenter study

• Published in: Journal of cardiology 2018-07, Vol.72 (1), p.74-80
• Main Authors: Kusunose, Kenya, Shibayama, Kentaro, Iwano, Hiroyuki, Izumo, Masaki, Kagiyama, Nobuyuki, Kurosawa, Koji, Mihara, Hirotsugu, Oe, Hiroki, Onishi, Tetsuari, Onishi, Toshinari, Ota, Mitsuhiko, Sasaki, Shunsuke, Shiina, Yumi, Tsuruta, Hikaru, Tanaka, Hidekazu
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cardiology - education; Clinical Competence; Echocardiography; Ejection fraction; Humans; Inservice Training; Japan; Learning session; Observer Variation; Quality control; Random Allocation; Stroke Volume
• ISSN: 0914-5087; 1876-4738
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.01.007

•Variability in visual assessment may be influenced by observer experience.•Experience affected the concordance in visual ejection fraction values.•Learning sessions can reduce the misclassification rate for left ventricular ejection fraction assessment. Visual estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is widely applied to confirm quantitative EF. However, visual assessment is subjective, and variability may be influenced by observer experience. We hypothesized that a learning session might reduce the misclassification rate. Protocol 1: Visual LVEFs for 30 cases were measured by 79 readers from 13 cardiovascular tertiary care centers. Readers were divided into 3 groups by their experience: limited (1–5 years, n=28), intermediate (6–11 years, n=26), and highly experienced (12-years, n=25). Protocol 2: All readers were randomized to assess the effect of a learning session with reference images only or feedback plus reference images. After the session, 20 new cases were shown to all readers following the same methodology. To assess the concordance and accuracy pre- and post-intervention, each visual LVEF measurement was compared to overall average values as a reference. Experience affected the concordance in visual EF values among the readers. Groups with intermediate and high experience showed significantly better mean difference (MD), standard deviation (SD), and coefficient of variation (CV) than those with limited experience at baseline. The learning session with reference image reduced the MD, SD, and CV in readers with limited experience. The learning session with reference images plus feedback also reduced proportional bias. Importantly, the misclassification rate for mid-range EF cases was reduced regardless of experience. This large multicenter study suggested that a simple learning session with reference images can successfully reduce the misclassification rate for LVEF assessment.