Loading…
Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance and bending properties of two reciprocating nickel‐titanium glide path files
Aim To compare the cyclic fatigue resistance and bending properties of R‐Pilot and WaveOne Gold (WOG) Glider files, at intracanal temperature (35°C). Methodology Forty R‐Pilot and 40 WOG Glider files were subjected to a cyclic fatigue resistance test (n = 20), calculating the time to fracture (TTF)...
Saved in:
| Published in: | International endodontic journal 2018-09, Vol.51 (9), p.1047-1052 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-7801ebab6685ea3ec84cacd727e5122cc6a250131b29310c9758cd0a3403b4963 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-7801ebab6685ea3ec84cacd727e5122cc6a250131b29310c9758cd0a3403b4963 |
| container_end_page | 1052 |
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 1047 |
| container_title | International endodontic journal |
| container_volume | 51 |
| creator | Özyürek, T. Uslu, G. Gündoğar, M. Yılmaz, K. Grande, N. M. Plotino, G. |
| description | Aim
To compare the cyclic fatigue resistance and bending properties of R‐Pilot and WaveOne Gold (WOG) Glider files, at intracanal temperature (35°C).
Methodology
Forty R‐Pilot and 40 WOG Glider files were subjected to a cyclic fatigue resistance test (n = 20), calculating the time to fracture (TTF) in an artificial stainless steel canal. The length of the fractured file tips (FL) was also measured. The fracture surface of fragments was examined with a scanning electron microscope, and the cross‐sectional area of the fractured surfaces was measured. Flexibility of the tested files (n = 20) was determined using 45° bending test. Data were analysed statistically using the Mann–Whitney U‐test at 5% significance level.
Results
Time to fracture was significantly higher in the R‐Pilot group compared to the WOG Glider (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/iej.12911 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2008363869</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2008363869</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-7801ebab6685ea3ec84cacd727e5122cc6a250131b29310c9758cd0a3403b4963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9O3DAQxq0KVBbaQ1-gssSlPQQ8dpw4R7TaFhASFzhHzmSy9ZJ_tRPQ3voIPGOfBNOFHpCYy0gzv-_TaD7GvoA4gVinjjYnIAuAD2wBKtOJ1AXssYWAVCXSGH3ADkPYCCG0UPCRHcgizY1M8wW7Xw7daL0LQ8-HhuMWW4e8sZNbz8Q9BRcm2yNx29e8or52_ZqPfhjJT47Cs2Z6GCKILk4x6uK-d3hH7d8_j5OLYjd3fN26mvhop1-8cS2FT2y_sW2gzy_9iN3-WN0sz5Or658Xy7OrBJVWkORGAFW2yjKjySpCk6LFOpc5aZASMbNSC1BQyUKBwCLXBmthVSpUlRaZOmLfdr7xuN8zhansXEBqW9vTMIdSCmFUpkxWRPT4DboZZt_H6yJl0lTpDEykvu8o9EMInppy9K6zfluCKJ_DKGMY5b8wIvv1xXGuOqr_k6_fj8DpDniIP9m-71RerC53lk8fKpTc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2084435618</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance and bending properties of two reciprocating nickel‐titanium glide path files</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Özyürek, T. ; Uslu, G. ; Gündoğar, M. ; Yılmaz, K. ; Grande, N. M. ; Plotino, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Özyürek, T. ; Uslu, G. ; Gündoğar, M. ; Yılmaz, K. ; Grande, N. M. ; Plotino, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
To compare the cyclic fatigue resistance and bending properties of R‐Pilot and WaveOne Gold (WOG) Glider files, at intracanal temperature (35°C).
Methodology
Forty R‐Pilot and 40 WOG Glider files were subjected to a cyclic fatigue resistance test (n = 20), calculating the time to fracture (TTF) in an artificial stainless steel canal. The length of the fractured file tips (FL) was also measured. The fracture surface of fragments was examined with a scanning electron microscope, and the cross‐sectional area of the fractured surfaces was measured. Flexibility of the tested files (n = 20) was determined using 45° bending test. Data were analysed statistically using the Mann–Whitney U‐test at 5% significance level.
Results
Time to fracture was significantly higher in the R‐Pilot group compared to the WOG Glider (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between groups for fracture length. The bending resistance of R‐Pilot files was significantly greater than WOG Glider files (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
A significant greater cyclic fatigue resistance was observed for R‐Pilot files compared to WOG Glider instruments, although the bending resistance of WOG Glider files was lower.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-2885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/iej.12911</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29478247</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Alloys ; bending resistance ; cyclic fatigue ; Data processing ; Dental Pulp Cavity - surgery ; Dentistry ; Endodontics ; Equipment Failure ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; Fractures ; glide path ; Humans ; Materials fatigue ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Nickel ; nickel‐titanium ; reciprocating files ; Root Canal Obturation - instrumentation ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Stainless steel ; Wear resistance</subject><ispartof>International endodontic journal, 2018-09, Vol.51 (9), p.1047-1052</ispartof><rights>2018 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2018 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-7801ebab6685ea3ec84cacd727e5122cc6a250131b29310c9758cd0a3403b4963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-7801ebab6685ea3ec84cacd727e5122cc6a250131b29310c9758cd0a3403b4963</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3407-9768 ; 0000-0001-6096-7385 ; 0000-0001-8656-7101 ; 0000-0003-3003-8029 ; 0000-0003-3299-3361</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29478247$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Özyürek, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uslu, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gündoğar, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yılmaz, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grande, N. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plotino, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance and bending properties of two reciprocating nickel‐titanium glide path files</title><title>International endodontic journal</title><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><description>Aim
To compare the cyclic fatigue resistance and bending properties of R‐Pilot and WaveOne Gold (WOG) Glider files, at intracanal temperature (35°C).
Methodology
Forty R‐Pilot and 40 WOG Glider files were subjected to a cyclic fatigue resistance test (n = 20), calculating the time to fracture (TTF) in an artificial stainless steel canal. The length of the fractured file tips (FL) was also measured. The fracture surface of fragments was examined with a scanning electron microscope, and the cross‐sectional area of the fractured surfaces was measured. Flexibility of the tested files (n = 20) was determined using 45° bending test. Data were analysed statistically using the Mann–Whitney U‐test at 5% significance level.
Results
Time to fracture was significantly higher in the R‐Pilot group compared to the WOG Glider (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between groups for fracture length. The bending resistance of R‐Pilot files was significantly greater than WOG Glider files (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
A significant greater cyclic fatigue resistance was observed for R‐Pilot files compared to WOG Glider instruments, although the bending resistance of WOG Glider files was lower.</description><subject>Alloys</subject><subject>bending resistance</subject><subject>cyclic fatigue</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Dental Pulp Cavity - surgery</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Endodontics</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>glide path</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Materials fatigue</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Nickel</subject><subject>nickel‐titanium</subject><subject>reciprocating files</subject><subject>Root Canal Obturation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Stainless steel</subject><subject>Wear resistance</subject><issn>0143-2885</issn><issn>1365-2591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9O3DAQxq0KVBbaQ1-gssSlPQQ8dpw4R7TaFhASFzhHzmSy9ZJ_tRPQ3voIPGOfBNOFHpCYy0gzv-_TaD7GvoA4gVinjjYnIAuAD2wBKtOJ1AXssYWAVCXSGH3ADkPYCCG0UPCRHcgizY1M8wW7Xw7daL0LQ8-HhuMWW4e8sZNbz8Q9BRcm2yNx29e8or52_ZqPfhjJT47Cs2Z6GCKILk4x6uK-d3hH7d8_j5OLYjd3fN26mvhop1-8cS2FT2y_sW2gzy_9iN3-WN0sz5Or658Xy7OrBJVWkORGAFW2yjKjySpCk6LFOpc5aZASMbNSC1BQyUKBwCLXBmthVSpUlRaZOmLfdr7xuN8zhansXEBqW9vTMIdSCmFUpkxWRPT4DboZZt_H6yJl0lTpDEykvu8o9EMInppy9K6zfluCKJ_DKGMY5b8wIvv1xXGuOqr_k6_fj8DpDniIP9m-71RerC53lk8fKpTc</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Özyürek, T.</creator><creator>Uslu, G.</creator><creator>Gündoğar, M.</creator><creator>Yılmaz, K.</creator><creator>Grande, N. M.</creator><creator>Plotino, G.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3407-9768</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-7385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8656-7101</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3003-8029</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3299-3361</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance and bending properties of two reciprocating nickel‐titanium glide path files</title><author>Özyürek, T. ; Uslu, G. ; Gündoğar, M. ; Yılmaz, K. ; Grande, N. M. ; Plotino, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-7801ebab6685ea3ec84cacd727e5122cc6a250131b29310c9758cd0a3403b4963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Alloys</topic><topic>bending resistance</topic><topic>cyclic fatigue</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Dental Pulp Cavity - surgery</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Endodontics</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>glide path</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Materials fatigue</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Nickel</topic><topic>nickel‐titanium</topic><topic>reciprocating files</topic><topic>Root Canal Obturation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Stainless steel</topic><topic>Wear resistance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Özyürek, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uslu, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gündoğar, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yılmaz, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grande, N. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plotino, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Özyürek, T.</au><au>Uslu, G.</au><au>Gündoğar, M.</au><au>Yılmaz, K.</au><au>Grande, N. M.</au><au>Plotino, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance and bending properties of two reciprocating nickel‐titanium glide path files</atitle><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1047</spage><epage>1052</epage><pages>1047-1052</pages><issn>0143-2885</issn><eissn>1365-2591</eissn><abstract>Aim
To compare the cyclic fatigue resistance and bending properties of R‐Pilot and WaveOne Gold (WOG) Glider files, at intracanal temperature (35°C).
Methodology
Forty R‐Pilot and 40 WOG Glider files were subjected to a cyclic fatigue resistance test (n = 20), calculating the time to fracture (TTF) in an artificial stainless steel canal. The length of the fractured file tips (FL) was also measured. The fracture surface of fragments was examined with a scanning electron microscope, and the cross‐sectional area of the fractured surfaces was measured. Flexibility of the tested files (n = 20) was determined using 45° bending test. Data were analysed statistically using the Mann–Whitney U‐test at 5% significance level.
Results
Time to fracture was significantly higher in the R‐Pilot group compared to the WOG Glider (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between groups for fracture length. The bending resistance of R‐Pilot files was significantly greater than WOG Glider files (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
A significant greater cyclic fatigue resistance was observed for R‐Pilot files compared to WOG Glider instruments, although the bending resistance of WOG Glider files was lower.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29478247</pmid><doi>10.1111/iej.12911</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3407-9768</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-7385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8656-7101</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3003-8029</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3299-3361</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0143-2885 |
| ispartof | International endodontic journal, 2018-09, Vol.51 (9), p.1047-1052 |
| issn | 0143-2885 1365-2591 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2008363869 |
| source | Wiley |
| subjects | Alloys bending resistance cyclic fatigue Data processing Dental Pulp Cavity - surgery Dentistry Endodontics Equipment Failure Equipment Failure Analysis Fractures glide path Humans Materials fatigue Microscopy, Electron, Scanning Nickel nickel‐titanium reciprocating files Root Canal Obturation - instrumentation Scanning electron microscopy Stainless steel Wear resistance |
| title | Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance and bending properties of two reciprocating nickel‐titanium glide path files |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T19%3A40%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20cyclic%20fatigue%20resistance%20and%20bending%20properties%20of%20two%20reciprocating%20nickel%E2%80%90titanium%20glide%20path%20files&rft.jtitle=International%20endodontic%20journal&rft.au=%C3%96zy%C3%BCrek,%20T.&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1047&rft.epage=1052&rft.pages=1047-1052&rft.issn=0143-2885&rft.eissn=1365-2591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/iej.12911&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2008363869%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-7801ebab6685ea3ec84cacd727e5122cc6a250131b29310c9758cd0a3403b4963%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2084435618&rft_id=info:pmid/29478247&rfr_iscdi=true |