Loading…
Pectin characterisation using size exclusion chromatography: A comparison of ELS and RI detection
•An optimisation of ELSD was done maximizing the detector response by RSM.•The air flow rate had the highest impact in the response ELSD.•Pectin characterisation with HPSEC-ELSD exhibited better results than HPSEC-RID. A high-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) method coupled to Evapor...
Saved in:
Published in: | Food chemistry 2018-06, Vol.252, p.271-276 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7e1ad19804269a487b26707cce25410bd5600a5481c4dff08cd82eab0a8105003 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7e1ad19804269a487b26707cce25410bd5600a5481c4dff08cd82eab0a8105003 |
container_end_page | 276 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 271 |
container_title | Food chemistry |
container_volume | 252 |
creator | Muñoz-Almagro, Nerea Rico-Rodriguez, Fabián Villamiel, Mar Montilla, Antonia |
description | •An optimisation of ELSD was done maximizing the detector response by RSM.•The air flow rate had the highest impact in the response ELSD.•Pectin characterisation with HPSEC-ELSD exhibited better results than HPSEC-RID.
A high-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) method coupled to Evaporative Light Scattering (ELS) and Refractive Index (RI) detectors were evaluated and compared for the molecular mass (Mw) estimation of pectin in a wide range (0.342–805 kDa). Instrumental parameters of the ELSD were optimised by Response Surface Methodology (RSM) being 73 °C the evaporator temperature and 0.9 mL/min the air flow rate. The linear range for the ELSD concentration response was wider (10–2250 mg/L) and better (R2 = 0.985) than RID (10–1500 mg/L; R2 = 0.875). The limits of detection (LOD) and quantitation (LOQ) for all pullulans hardly changed in ELSD (LOD: 1.22–1.99 mg/L; LOQ: 4.07–6.63 mg/L); however, RID showed huge variations (LOD: 0.49–10.41 mg/L; LOQ: 1.64–34.70 mg/L), which increased with the Mw. In general, responses of both detectors were similar for the Mw estimation, although pectin characterisation with HPSEC-ELSD exhibited better results in the lowest Mw compounds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.087 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2008372602</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0308814618300967</els_id><sourcerecordid>2008372602</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7e1ad19804269a487b26707cce25410bd5600a5481c4dff08cd82eab0a8105003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWqt_QXL0susk-5V6sogfhYLixzmkyWyb0t3UZCvqrzdLW6-ehjDPO5N5CLlgkDJg5dUyrZ0zeoFNyoGJFFgKojogAyaqLKmg4odkABmIRLC8PCGnISwBoGePyQkf5ZUocjYg6hl1Z1uqF8or3aG3QXXWtXQTbDunwf4gxS-9ik_XU941qnNzr9aL72s6pto1axVDselqejd9pao19GVCDXb9ZNeekaNarQKe7-qQvN_fvd0-JtOnh8nteJrovMi6pEKmDBsJyHk5UrmoZryMZ2iNPH4UZqYoAVSRC6ZzU9cgtBEc1QyUYFAAZENyuZ279u5jg6GTjQ0aVyvVotsEyQFEVvESeETLLaq9C8FjLdfeNsp_Sway1yuXcq9X9sokMBn1xuDFbsdm1qD5i-19RuBmC2C89NOil0FbbDUa66MOaZz9b8cvHouPKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2008372602</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pectin characterisation using size exclusion chromatography: A comparison of ELS and RI detection</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Muñoz-Almagro, Nerea ; Rico-Rodriguez, Fabián ; Villamiel, Mar ; Montilla, Antonia</creator><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Almagro, Nerea ; Rico-Rodriguez, Fabián ; Villamiel, Mar ; Montilla, Antonia</creatorcontrib><description>•An optimisation of ELSD was done maximizing the detector response by RSM.•The air flow rate had the highest impact in the response ELSD.•Pectin characterisation with HPSEC-ELSD exhibited better results than HPSEC-RID.
A high-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) method coupled to Evaporative Light Scattering (ELS) and Refractive Index (RI) detectors were evaluated and compared for the molecular mass (Mw) estimation of pectin in a wide range (0.342–805 kDa). Instrumental parameters of the ELSD were optimised by Response Surface Methodology (RSM) being 73 °C the evaporator temperature and 0.9 mL/min the air flow rate. The linear range for the ELSD concentration response was wider (10–2250 mg/L) and better (R2 = 0.985) than RID (10–1500 mg/L; R2 = 0.875). The limits of detection (LOD) and quantitation (LOQ) for all pullulans hardly changed in ELSD (LOD: 1.22–1.99 mg/L; LOQ: 4.07–6.63 mg/L); however, RID showed huge variations (LOD: 0.49–10.41 mg/L; LOQ: 1.64–34.70 mg/L), which increased with the Mw. In general, responses of both detectors were similar for the Mw estimation, although pectin characterisation with HPSEC-ELSD exhibited better results in the lowest Mw compounds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-8146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7072</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.087</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29478541</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Light scattering ; Molecular mass ; Pectin ; Refraction index ; Response Surface Methodology</subject><ispartof>Food chemistry, 2018-06, Vol.252, p.271-276</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7e1ad19804269a487b26707cce25410bd5600a5481c4dff08cd82eab0a8105003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7e1ad19804269a487b26707cce25410bd5600a5481c4dff08cd82eab0a8105003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29478541$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Almagro, Nerea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rico-Rodriguez, Fabián</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villamiel, Mar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montilla, Antonia</creatorcontrib><title>Pectin characterisation using size exclusion chromatography: A comparison of ELS and RI detection</title><title>Food chemistry</title><addtitle>Food Chem</addtitle><description>•An optimisation of ELSD was done maximizing the detector response by RSM.•The air flow rate had the highest impact in the response ELSD.•Pectin characterisation with HPSEC-ELSD exhibited better results than HPSEC-RID.
A high-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) method coupled to Evaporative Light Scattering (ELS) and Refractive Index (RI) detectors were evaluated and compared for the molecular mass (Mw) estimation of pectin in a wide range (0.342–805 kDa). Instrumental parameters of the ELSD were optimised by Response Surface Methodology (RSM) being 73 °C the evaporator temperature and 0.9 mL/min the air flow rate. The linear range for the ELSD concentration response was wider (10–2250 mg/L) and better (R2 = 0.985) than RID (10–1500 mg/L; R2 = 0.875). The limits of detection (LOD) and quantitation (LOQ) for all pullulans hardly changed in ELSD (LOD: 1.22–1.99 mg/L; LOQ: 4.07–6.63 mg/L); however, RID showed huge variations (LOD: 0.49–10.41 mg/L; LOQ: 1.64–34.70 mg/L), which increased with the Mw. In general, responses of both detectors were similar for the Mw estimation, although pectin characterisation with HPSEC-ELSD exhibited better results in the lowest Mw compounds.</description><subject>Light scattering</subject><subject>Molecular mass</subject><subject>Pectin</subject><subject>Refraction index</subject><subject>Response Surface Methodology</subject><issn>0308-8146</issn><issn>1873-7072</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWqt_QXL0susk-5V6sogfhYLixzmkyWyb0t3UZCvqrzdLW6-ehjDPO5N5CLlgkDJg5dUyrZ0zeoFNyoGJFFgKojogAyaqLKmg4odkABmIRLC8PCGnISwBoGePyQkf5ZUocjYg6hl1Z1uqF8or3aG3QXXWtXQTbDunwf4gxS-9ik_XU941qnNzr9aL72s6pto1axVDselqejd9pao19GVCDXb9ZNeekaNarQKe7-qQvN_fvd0-JtOnh8nteJrovMi6pEKmDBsJyHk5UrmoZryMZ2iNPH4UZqYoAVSRC6ZzU9cgtBEc1QyUYFAAZENyuZ279u5jg6GTjQ0aVyvVotsEyQFEVvESeETLLaq9C8FjLdfeNsp_Sway1yuXcq9X9sokMBn1xuDFbsdm1qD5i-19RuBmC2C89NOil0FbbDUa66MOaZz9b8cvHouPKg</recordid><startdate>20180630</startdate><enddate>20180630</enddate><creator>Muñoz-Almagro, Nerea</creator><creator>Rico-Rodriguez, Fabián</creator><creator>Villamiel, Mar</creator><creator>Montilla, Antonia</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180630</creationdate><title>Pectin characterisation using size exclusion chromatography: A comparison of ELS and RI detection</title><author>Muñoz-Almagro, Nerea ; Rico-Rodriguez, Fabián ; Villamiel, Mar ; Montilla, Antonia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7e1ad19804269a487b26707cce25410bd5600a5481c4dff08cd82eab0a8105003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Light scattering</topic><topic>Molecular mass</topic><topic>Pectin</topic><topic>Refraction index</topic><topic>Response Surface Methodology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Almagro, Nerea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rico-Rodriguez, Fabián</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villamiel, Mar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montilla, Antonia</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Food chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muñoz-Almagro, Nerea</au><au>Rico-Rodriguez, Fabián</au><au>Villamiel, Mar</au><au>Montilla, Antonia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pectin characterisation using size exclusion chromatography: A comparison of ELS and RI detection</atitle><jtitle>Food chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Food Chem</addtitle><date>2018-06-30</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>252</volume><spage>271</spage><epage>276</epage><pages>271-276</pages><issn>0308-8146</issn><eissn>1873-7072</eissn><abstract>•An optimisation of ELSD was done maximizing the detector response by RSM.•The air flow rate had the highest impact in the response ELSD.•Pectin characterisation with HPSEC-ELSD exhibited better results than HPSEC-RID.
A high-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) method coupled to Evaporative Light Scattering (ELS) and Refractive Index (RI) detectors were evaluated and compared for the molecular mass (Mw) estimation of pectin in a wide range (0.342–805 kDa). Instrumental parameters of the ELSD were optimised by Response Surface Methodology (RSM) being 73 °C the evaporator temperature and 0.9 mL/min the air flow rate. The linear range for the ELSD concentration response was wider (10–2250 mg/L) and better (R2 = 0.985) than RID (10–1500 mg/L; R2 = 0.875). The limits of detection (LOD) and quantitation (LOQ) for all pullulans hardly changed in ELSD (LOD: 1.22–1.99 mg/L; LOQ: 4.07–6.63 mg/L); however, RID showed huge variations (LOD: 0.49–10.41 mg/L; LOQ: 1.64–34.70 mg/L), which increased with the Mw. In general, responses of both detectors were similar for the Mw estimation, although pectin characterisation with HPSEC-ELSD exhibited better results in the lowest Mw compounds.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29478541</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.087</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0308-8146 |
ispartof | Food chemistry, 2018-06, Vol.252, p.271-276 |
issn | 0308-8146 1873-7072 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2008372602 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Light scattering Molecular mass Pectin Refraction index Response Surface Methodology |
title | Pectin characterisation using size exclusion chromatography: A comparison of ELS and RI detection |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A21%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pectin%20characterisation%20using%20size%20exclusion%20chromatography:%20A%20comparison%20of%20ELS%20and%20RI%20detection&rft.jtitle=Food%20chemistry&rft.au=Mu%C3%B1oz-Almagro,%20Nerea&rft.date=2018-06-30&rft.volume=252&rft.spage=271&rft.epage=276&rft.pages=271-276&rft.issn=0308-8146&rft.eissn=1873-7072&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.087&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2008372602%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7e1ad19804269a487b26707cce25410bd5600a5481c4dff08cd82eab0a8105003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2008372602&rft_id=info:pmid/29478541&rfr_iscdi=true |