Loading…

Pectin characterisation using size exclusion chromatography: A comparison of ELS and RI detection

•An optimisation of ELSD was done maximizing the detector response by RSM.•The air flow rate had the highest impact in the response ELSD.•Pectin characterisation with HPSEC-ELSD exhibited better results than HPSEC-RID. A high-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) method coupled to Evapor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Food chemistry 2018-06, Vol.252, p.271-276
Main Authors: Muñoz-Almagro, Nerea, Rico-Rodriguez, Fabián, Villamiel, Mar, Montilla, Antonia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7e1ad19804269a487b26707cce25410bd5600a5481c4dff08cd82eab0a8105003
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7e1ad19804269a487b26707cce25410bd5600a5481c4dff08cd82eab0a8105003
container_end_page 276
container_issue
container_start_page 271
container_title Food chemistry
container_volume 252
creator Muñoz-Almagro, Nerea
Rico-Rodriguez, Fabián
Villamiel, Mar
Montilla, Antonia
description •An optimisation of ELSD was done maximizing the detector response by RSM.•The air flow rate had the highest impact in the response ELSD.•Pectin characterisation with HPSEC-ELSD exhibited better results than HPSEC-RID. A high-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) method coupled to Evaporative Light Scattering (ELS) and Refractive Index (RI) detectors were evaluated and compared for the molecular mass (Mw) estimation of pectin in a wide range (0.342–805 kDa). Instrumental parameters of the ELSD were optimised by Response Surface Methodology (RSM) being 73 °C the evaporator temperature and 0.9 mL/min the air flow rate. The linear range for the ELSD concentration response was wider (10–2250 mg/L) and better (R2 = 0.985) than RID (10–1500 mg/L; R2 = 0.875). The limits of detection (LOD) and quantitation (LOQ) for all pullulans hardly changed in ELSD (LOD: 1.22–1.99 mg/L; LOQ: 4.07–6.63 mg/L); however, RID showed huge variations (LOD: 0.49–10.41 mg/L; LOQ: 1.64–34.70 mg/L), which increased with the Mw. In general, responses of both detectors were similar for the Mw estimation, although pectin characterisation with HPSEC-ELSD exhibited better results in the lowest Mw compounds.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.087
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2008372602</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0308814618300967</els_id><sourcerecordid>2008372602</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7e1ad19804269a487b26707cce25410bd5600a5481c4dff08cd82eab0a8105003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWqt_QXL0susk-5V6sogfhYLixzmkyWyb0t3UZCvqrzdLW6-ehjDPO5N5CLlgkDJg5dUyrZ0zeoFNyoGJFFgKojogAyaqLKmg4odkABmIRLC8PCGnISwBoGePyQkf5ZUocjYg6hl1Z1uqF8or3aG3QXXWtXQTbDunwf4gxS-9ik_XU941qnNzr9aL72s6pto1axVDselqejd9pao19GVCDXb9ZNeekaNarQKe7-qQvN_fvd0-JtOnh8nteJrovMi6pEKmDBsJyHk5UrmoZryMZ2iNPH4UZqYoAVSRC6ZzU9cgtBEc1QyUYFAAZENyuZ279u5jg6GTjQ0aVyvVotsEyQFEVvESeETLLaq9C8FjLdfeNsp_Sway1yuXcq9X9sokMBn1xuDFbsdm1qD5i-19RuBmC2C89NOil0FbbDUa66MOaZz9b8cvHouPKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2008372602</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pectin characterisation using size exclusion chromatography: A comparison of ELS and RI detection</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Muñoz-Almagro, Nerea ; Rico-Rodriguez, Fabián ; Villamiel, Mar ; Montilla, Antonia</creator><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Almagro, Nerea ; Rico-Rodriguez, Fabián ; Villamiel, Mar ; Montilla, Antonia</creatorcontrib><description>•An optimisation of ELSD was done maximizing the detector response by RSM.•The air flow rate had the highest impact in the response ELSD.•Pectin characterisation with HPSEC-ELSD exhibited better results than HPSEC-RID. A high-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) method coupled to Evaporative Light Scattering (ELS) and Refractive Index (RI) detectors were evaluated and compared for the molecular mass (Mw) estimation of pectin in a wide range (0.342–805 kDa). Instrumental parameters of the ELSD were optimised by Response Surface Methodology (RSM) being 73 °C the evaporator temperature and 0.9 mL/min the air flow rate. The linear range for the ELSD concentration response was wider (10–2250 mg/L) and better (R2 = 0.985) than RID (10–1500 mg/L; R2 = 0.875). The limits of detection (LOD) and quantitation (LOQ) for all pullulans hardly changed in ELSD (LOD: 1.22–1.99 mg/L; LOQ: 4.07–6.63 mg/L); however, RID showed huge variations (LOD: 0.49–10.41 mg/L; LOQ: 1.64–34.70 mg/L), which increased with the Mw. In general, responses of both detectors were similar for the Mw estimation, although pectin characterisation with HPSEC-ELSD exhibited better results in the lowest Mw compounds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-8146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7072</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.087</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29478541</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Light scattering ; Molecular mass ; Pectin ; Refraction index ; Response Surface Methodology</subject><ispartof>Food chemistry, 2018-06, Vol.252, p.271-276</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7e1ad19804269a487b26707cce25410bd5600a5481c4dff08cd82eab0a8105003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7e1ad19804269a487b26707cce25410bd5600a5481c4dff08cd82eab0a8105003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29478541$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Almagro, Nerea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rico-Rodriguez, Fabián</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villamiel, Mar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montilla, Antonia</creatorcontrib><title>Pectin characterisation using size exclusion chromatography: A comparison of ELS and RI detection</title><title>Food chemistry</title><addtitle>Food Chem</addtitle><description>•An optimisation of ELSD was done maximizing the detector response by RSM.•The air flow rate had the highest impact in the response ELSD.•Pectin characterisation with HPSEC-ELSD exhibited better results than HPSEC-RID. A high-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) method coupled to Evaporative Light Scattering (ELS) and Refractive Index (RI) detectors were evaluated and compared for the molecular mass (Mw) estimation of pectin in a wide range (0.342–805 kDa). Instrumental parameters of the ELSD were optimised by Response Surface Methodology (RSM) being 73 °C the evaporator temperature and 0.9 mL/min the air flow rate. The linear range for the ELSD concentration response was wider (10–2250 mg/L) and better (R2 = 0.985) than RID (10–1500 mg/L; R2 = 0.875). The limits of detection (LOD) and quantitation (LOQ) for all pullulans hardly changed in ELSD (LOD: 1.22–1.99 mg/L; LOQ: 4.07–6.63 mg/L); however, RID showed huge variations (LOD: 0.49–10.41 mg/L; LOQ: 1.64–34.70 mg/L), which increased with the Mw. In general, responses of both detectors were similar for the Mw estimation, although pectin characterisation with HPSEC-ELSD exhibited better results in the lowest Mw compounds.</description><subject>Light scattering</subject><subject>Molecular mass</subject><subject>Pectin</subject><subject>Refraction index</subject><subject>Response Surface Methodology</subject><issn>0308-8146</issn><issn>1873-7072</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWqt_QXL0susk-5V6sogfhYLixzmkyWyb0t3UZCvqrzdLW6-ehjDPO5N5CLlgkDJg5dUyrZ0zeoFNyoGJFFgKojogAyaqLKmg4odkABmIRLC8PCGnISwBoGePyQkf5ZUocjYg6hl1Z1uqF8or3aG3QXXWtXQTbDunwf4gxS-9ik_XU941qnNzr9aL72s6pto1axVDselqejd9pao19GVCDXb9ZNeekaNarQKe7-qQvN_fvd0-JtOnh8nteJrovMi6pEKmDBsJyHk5UrmoZryMZ2iNPH4UZqYoAVSRC6ZzU9cgtBEc1QyUYFAAZENyuZ279u5jg6GTjQ0aVyvVotsEyQFEVvESeETLLaq9C8FjLdfeNsp_Sway1yuXcq9X9sokMBn1xuDFbsdm1qD5i-19RuBmC2C89NOil0FbbDUa66MOaZz9b8cvHouPKg</recordid><startdate>20180630</startdate><enddate>20180630</enddate><creator>Muñoz-Almagro, Nerea</creator><creator>Rico-Rodriguez, Fabián</creator><creator>Villamiel, Mar</creator><creator>Montilla, Antonia</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180630</creationdate><title>Pectin characterisation using size exclusion chromatography: A comparison of ELS and RI detection</title><author>Muñoz-Almagro, Nerea ; Rico-Rodriguez, Fabián ; Villamiel, Mar ; Montilla, Antonia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7e1ad19804269a487b26707cce25410bd5600a5481c4dff08cd82eab0a8105003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Light scattering</topic><topic>Molecular mass</topic><topic>Pectin</topic><topic>Refraction index</topic><topic>Response Surface Methodology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Almagro, Nerea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rico-Rodriguez, Fabián</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villamiel, Mar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montilla, Antonia</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Food chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muñoz-Almagro, Nerea</au><au>Rico-Rodriguez, Fabián</au><au>Villamiel, Mar</au><au>Montilla, Antonia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pectin characterisation using size exclusion chromatography: A comparison of ELS and RI detection</atitle><jtitle>Food chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Food Chem</addtitle><date>2018-06-30</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>252</volume><spage>271</spage><epage>276</epage><pages>271-276</pages><issn>0308-8146</issn><eissn>1873-7072</eissn><abstract>•An optimisation of ELSD was done maximizing the detector response by RSM.•The air flow rate had the highest impact in the response ELSD.•Pectin characterisation with HPSEC-ELSD exhibited better results than HPSEC-RID. A high-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) method coupled to Evaporative Light Scattering (ELS) and Refractive Index (RI) detectors were evaluated and compared for the molecular mass (Mw) estimation of pectin in a wide range (0.342–805 kDa). Instrumental parameters of the ELSD were optimised by Response Surface Methodology (RSM) being 73 °C the evaporator temperature and 0.9 mL/min the air flow rate. The linear range for the ELSD concentration response was wider (10–2250 mg/L) and better (R2 = 0.985) than RID (10–1500 mg/L; R2 = 0.875). The limits of detection (LOD) and quantitation (LOQ) for all pullulans hardly changed in ELSD (LOD: 1.22–1.99 mg/L; LOQ: 4.07–6.63 mg/L); however, RID showed huge variations (LOD: 0.49–10.41 mg/L; LOQ: 1.64–34.70 mg/L), which increased with the Mw. In general, responses of both detectors were similar for the Mw estimation, although pectin characterisation with HPSEC-ELSD exhibited better results in the lowest Mw compounds.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29478541</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.087</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0308-8146
ispartof Food chemistry, 2018-06, Vol.252, p.271-276
issn 0308-8146
1873-7072
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2008372602
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Light scattering
Molecular mass
Pectin
Refraction index
Response Surface Methodology
title Pectin characterisation using size exclusion chromatography: A comparison of ELS and RI detection
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A21%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pectin%20characterisation%20using%20size%20exclusion%20chromatography:%20A%20comparison%20of%20ELS%20and%20RI%20detection&rft.jtitle=Food%20chemistry&rft.au=Mu%C3%B1oz-Almagro,%20Nerea&rft.date=2018-06-30&rft.volume=252&rft.spage=271&rft.epage=276&rft.pages=271-276&rft.issn=0308-8146&rft.eissn=1873-7072&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.087&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2008372602%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-7e1ad19804269a487b26707cce25410bd5600a5481c4dff08cd82eab0a8105003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2008372602&rft_id=info:pmid/29478541&rfr_iscdi=true