Loading…

Collostructional analysis and other ways of measuring lexicogrammatical attraction: Theoretical premises, practical problems and cognitive underpinnings

Collostructional analysis is a corpus-based quantitative method of measuring the mutual attraction of lexemes and constructions (cf. Stefanowitsch and Gries 2003) which has gained considerable popularity among corpus linguists and especially cognitive linguists with a statistical bent. For many less...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cognitive linguistics 2013-01, Vol.24 (3), p.531-577
Main Authors: Schmid, Hans-Jorg, Kuchenhoff, Helmut
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-93eb6bba46fc9a703c4395af9e20c0323e844a1a5298b8f86363fc01d8a275a03
cites
container_end_page 577
container_issue 3
container_start_page 531
container_title Cognitive linguistics
container_volume 24
creator Schmid, Hans-Jorg
Kuchenhoff, Helmut
description Collostructional analysis is a corpus-based quantitative method of measuring the mutual attraction of lexemes and constructions (cf. Stefanowitsch and Gries 2003) which has gained considerable popularity among corpus linguists and especially cognitive linguists with a statistical bent. For many less statistically minded linguists, it has proven rather difficult to evaluate the theoretical background assumptions and cognitive underpinnings of collostructional analysis and to compare them to alternative ways of modelling lexicogrammatical attraction phenomena. This paper aims to spell out these premises and foundations in terms comprehensible to a wider audience. It begins with a concise survey of how collostructional analysis works and then reports on a number of practical, theoretical and statistical issues of which both practitioners of the method and those who try to appreciate results of its application should be aware. With these issues in mind we then discuss alternative ways of calculating and interpreting lexicogrammatical attraction. The advantages and disadvantages of the different methods are discussed, also against the background of the results of studies that have tried to evaluate the measures by means of external evidence from psycholinguistic experiments. Finally, cognitive underpinnings of lexicogrammatical associations and implications for the different approaches are discussed. It is argued that at present we lack adequate knowledge about the ways in which discourse frequencies affect entrenchment. We conclude that the complexities of the relation between corpus frequencies and degrees of entrenchment are still rather poorly understood, and make suggestions for future work.
doi_str_mv 10.1515/cog-2013-0018
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2008863088</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1512334976</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-93eb6bba46fc9a703c4395af9e20c0323e844a1a5298b8f86363fc01d8a275a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1PwzAMhiMEEmNw5N4jBwpJk_SDG5r4kiZxGefKzdwtKG1GkgL7J_xcUsodLo7lPH5fyybknNErJpm8VnaTZpTxlFJWHpAZy2POc8EOyYxWPE9lRYtjcuL9ayQkzYoZ-VpYY6wPblBB2x5MAjHsvfYxWSc2bNElH7D3iW2TDsEPTvebxOCnjnYOug6CVmNbCA5-NG6S1Ratw6m-c9hpj_4yZuP_VLONwW6yiDK9Dvodk6Ffo9vpvo8O_pQctWA8nv2-c_Jyf7daPKbL54enxe0yVUKwkFYcm7xpQOStqqCgXAleSWgrzKiiPONYCgEMZFaVTdmWOc95qyhbl5AVEiifk4tJNw71NqAPdRxXoTHQox18nVFaxq4Y_kSZ5IWMdhn_B8oiJaoij2g6ocpZ7x229c7pDty-ZnTkZB03VI93rce78m_TiZni</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1512334976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Collostructional analysis and other ways of measuring lexicogrammatical attraction: Theoretical premises, practical problems and cognitive underpinnings</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Schmid, Hans-Jorg ; Kuchenhoff, Helmut</creator><creatorcontrib>Schmid, Hans-Jorg ; Kuchenhoff, Helmut</creatorcontrib><description>Collostructional analysis is a corpus-based quantitative method of measuring the mutual attraction of lexemes and constructions (cf. Stefanowitsch and Gries 2003) which has gained considerable popularity among corpus linguists and especially cognitive linguists with a statistical bent. For many less statistically minded linguists, it has proven rather difficult to evaluate the theoretical background assumptions and cognitive underpinnings of collostructional analysis and to compare them to alternative ways of modelling lexicogrammatical attraction phenomena. This paper aims to spell out these premises and foundations in terms comprehensible to a wider audience. It begins with a concise survey of how collostructional analysis works and then reports on a number of practical, theoretical and statistical issues of which both practitioners of the method and those who try to appreciate results of its application should be aware. With these issues in mind we then discuss alternative ways of calculating and interpreting lexicogrammatical attraction. The advantages and disadvantages of the different methods are discussed, also against the background of the results of studies that have tried to evaluate the measures by means of external evidence from psycholinguistic experiments. Finally, cognitive underpinnings of lexicogrammatical associations and implications for the different approaches are discussed. It is argued that at present we lack adequate knowledge about the ways in which discourse frequencies affect entrenchment. We conclude that the complexities of the relation between corpus frequencies and degrees of entrenchment are still rather poorly understood, and make suggestions for future work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-5907</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-3641</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/cog-2013-0018</identifier><identifier>CODEN: COGLEJ</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Cognitive linguistics, 2013-01, Vol.24 (3), p.531-577</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-93eb6bba46fc9a703c4395af9e20c0323e844a1a5298b8f86363fc01d8a275a03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31270</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schmid, Hans-Jorg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuchenhoff, Helmut</creatorcontrib><title>Collostructional analysis and other ways of measuring lexicogrammatical attraction: Theoretical premises, practical problems and cognitive underpinnings</title><title>Cognitive linguistics</title><description>Collostructional analysis is a corpus-based quantitative method of measuring the mutual attraction of lexemes and constructions (cf. Stefanowitsch and Gries 2003) which has gained considerable popularity among corpus linguists and especially cognitive linguists with a statistical bent. For many less statistically minded linguists, it has proven rather difficult to evaluate the theoretical background assumptions and cognitive underpinnings of collostructional analysis and to compare them to alternative ways of modelling lexicogrammatical attraction phenomena. This paper aims to spell out these premises and foundations in terms comprehensible to a wider audience. It begins with a concise survey of how collostructional analysis works and then reports on a number of practical, theoretical and statistical issues of which both practitioners of the method and those who try to appreciate results of its application should be aware. With these issues in mind we then discuss alternative ways of calculating and interpreting lexicogrammatical attraction. The advantages and disadvantages of the different methods are discussed, also against the background of the results of studies that have tried to evaluate the measures by means of external evidence from psycholinguistic experiments. Finally, cognitive underpinnings of lexicogrammatical associations and implications for the different approaches are discussed. It is argued that at present we lack adequate knowledge about the ways in which discourse frequencies affect entrenchment. We conclude that the complexities of the relation between corpus frequencies and degrees of entrenchment are still rather poorly understood, and make suggestions for future work.</description><issn>0936-5907</issn><issn>1613-3641</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1PwzAMhiMEEmNw5N4jBwpJk_SDG5r4kiZxGefKzdwtKG1GkgL7J_xcUsodLo7lPH5fyybknNErJpm8VnaTZpTxlFJWHpAZy2POc8EOyYxWPE9lRYtjcuL9ayQkzYoZ-VpYY6wPblBB2x5MAjHsvfYxWSc2bNElH7D3iW2TDsEPTvebxOCnjnYOug6CVmNbCA5-NG6S1Ratw6m-c9hpj_4yZuP_VLONwW6yiDK9Dvodk6Ffo9vpvo8O_pQctWA8nv2-c_Jyf7daPKbL54enxe0yVUKwkFYcm7xpQOStqqCgXAleSWgrzKiiPONYCgEMZFaVTdmWOc95qyhbl5AVEiifk4tJNw71NqAPdRxXoTHQox18nVFaxq4Y_kSZ5IWMdhn_B8oiJaoij2g6ocpZ7x229c7pDty-ZnTkZB03VI93rce78m_TiZni</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Schmid, Hans-Jorg</creator><creator>Kuchenhoff, Helmut</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Collostructional analysis and other ways of measuring lexicogrammatical attraction: Theoretical premises, practical problems and cognitive underpinnings</title><author>Schmid, Hans-Jorg ; Kuchenhoff, Helmut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-93eb6bba46fc9a703c4395af9e20c0323e844a1a5298b8f86363fc01d8a275a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schmid, Hans-Jorg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuchenhoff, Helmut</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Cognitive linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schmid, Hans-Jorg</au><au>Kuchenhoff, Helmut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Collostructional analysis and other ways of measuring lexicogrammatical attraction: Theoretical premises, practical problems and cognitive underpinnings</atitle><jtitle>Cognitive linguistics</jtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>531</spage><epage>577</epage><pages>531-577</pages><issn>0936-5907</issn><eissn>1613-3641</eissn><coden>COGLEJ</coden><abstract>Collostructional analysis is a corpus-based quantitative method of measuring the mutual attraction of lexemes and constructions (cf. Stefanowitsch and Gries 2003) which has gained considerable popularity among corpus linguists and especially cognitive linguists with a statistical bent. For many less statistically minded linguists, it has proven rather difficult to evaluate the theoretical background assumptions and cognitive underpinnings of collostructional analysis and to compare them to alternative ways of modelling lexicogrammatical attraction phenomena. This paper aims to spell out these premises and foundations in terms comprehensible to a wider audience. It begins with a concise survey of how collostructional analysis works and then reports on a number of practical, theoretical and statistical issues of which both practitioners of the method and those who try to appreciate results of its application should be aware. With these issues in mind we then discuss alternative ways of calculating and interpreting lexicogrammatical attraction. The advantages and disadvantages of the different methods are discussed, also against the background of the results of studies that have tried to evaluate the measures by means of external evidence from psycholinguistic experiments. Finally, cognitive underpinnings of lexicogrammatical associations and implications for the different approaches are discussed. It is argued that at present we lack adequate knowledge about the ways in which discourse frequencies affect entrenchment. We conclude that the complexities of the relation between corpus frequencies and degrees of entrenchment are still rather poorly understood, and make suggestions for future work.</abstract><doi>10.1515/cog-2013-0018</doi><tpages>47</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0936-5907
ispartof Cognitive linguistics, 2013-01, Vol.24 (3), p.531-577
issn 0936-5907
1613-3641
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2008863088
source EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
title Collostructional analysis and other ways of measuring lexicogrammatical attraction: Theoretical premises, practical problems and cognitive underpinnings
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T12%3A25%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Collostructional%20analysis%20and%20other%20ways%20of%20measuring%20lexicogrammatical%20attraction:%20Theoretical%20premises,%20practical%20problems%20and%20cognitive%20underpinnings&rft.jtitle=Cognitive%20linguistics&rft.au=Schmid,%20Hans-Jorg&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=531&rft.epage=577&rft.pages=531-577&rft.issn=0936-5907&rft.eissn=1613-3641&rft.coden=COGLEJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/cog-2013-0018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1512334976%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-93eb6bba46fc9a703c4395af9e20c0323e844a1a5298b8f86363fc01d8a275a03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1512334976&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true