wh-duplication in Italian Sign Language (LIS)

This paper focuses on those WH-questions in Italian Sign Language (LIS) featuring two lexically identical WH-signs. We show that WH1 (the first WH in linear order) is shorter than WH2 (the second WH in liner order). However, there is evidence that this different duration is due to a phrase-final len...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sign language & linguistics 2013-01, Vol.16 (2), p.157-188
Main Authors: Branchini, Chiara, Cardinaletti, Anna, Cecchetto, Carlo, Donati, Caterina, Geraci, Carlo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cleft constructions
Italian language
Questions
Sign language
Wh phrases
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper focuses on those WH-questions in Italian Sign Language (LIS) featuring two lexically identical WH-signs. We show that WH1 (the first WH in linear order) is shorter than WH2 (the second WH in liner order). However, there is evidence that this different duration is due to a phrase-final lengthening, as WH2 occupies a sentence-final position. We therefore conclude that the two WH-signs are identical full copies: one sitting in Spec,CP on the right in LIS and the other one sitting in Spec,FocP on the left. We show that this construction yields a (focused) cleft question interpretation and we speculate that both copies are phonologically realized because the WH-signs in Spec,CP and Spec,FocP are the heads of two distinct chains. Finally, we distinguish identical WH-duplication from improper WH-duplication, namely cases where one of the two WH-elements is what we call QARTICHOKE, an underspecified interrogative sign only surfacing in WH-questions. Adapted from the source document
ISSN:1387-9316
1569-996X
DOI:10.1075/sll.16.2.03bra