Loading…

Electroacupuncture for patients with refractory functional dyspepsia: A randomized controlled trial

Background To test the efficacy of electroacupuncture for patients with refractory functional dyspepsia (FD). Methods A 24‐week, 2‐arm, single‐blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted at three hospitals in China. Patients with refractory FD were randomly assigned to receive 20 sessions of au...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neurogastroenterology and motility 2018-07, Vol.30 (7), p.e13316-n/a
Main Authors: Zheng, H., Xu, J., Sun, X., Zeng, F., Li, Y., Wu, X., Li, J., Zhao, L., Chang, X.‐R., Liu, M., Gong, B., Li, X.‐Z., Liang, F.‐R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background To test the efficacy of electroacupuncture for patients with refractory functional dyspepsia (FD). Methods A 24‐week, 2‐arm, single‐blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted at three hospitals in China. Patients with refractory FD were randomly assigned to receive 20 sessions of authentic or sham electroacupuncture in a treatment duration of 4 weeks. The primary outcome was complete absence of dyspeptic symptoms at 16 weeks after initiation of acupuncture (week 16). The secondary outcomes included adequate relief of dyspeptic symptoms, Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire (LDQ), Nepean Dyspepsia Index (NDI), and adverse events. Intention‐to‐treat analysis was performed. Key Results Two hundred patients were included, of which 196 (98%) completed follow‐up data at week 24. At week 16, 17 (17%) patients in the authentic electroacupuncture group vs 6 (6%) patients in the sham group achieved the primary outcome (P = .014). Sixty‐two (62%) patients had adequate relief in the authentic electroacupuncture group, as compared to 22 (22%) in the sham group (P = .001). The scores of LDQ and NDI were significantly improved in both groups at week 16, and patients in the authentic electroacupuncture group have more improvements (LDQ, mean difference, −2.2, 95% confidence interval, −2.3 to −2.1, P 
ISSN:1350-1925
1365-2982
DOI:10.1111/nmo.13316