Loading…

Feasibility of the clinical dynamic visual acuity test in typically developing preschoolers

Objectives To determine the feasibility of the dynamic visual acuity test (DVA) in children who are preschoolers. Methods Thirty-three preschoolers [3 years old ( n  = 11), 4 years old ( n  = 6), 5 years old ( n  = 8), and 6 years old ( n  = 8)], performed a static visual acuity test (SVA), a passiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology 2018-05, Vol.275 (5), p.1343-1348
Main Authors: Verbecque, Evi, De Belder, Niels, Marijnissen, Tessa, Vereeck, Luc, Van de Heyning, Paul, Hallemans, Ann
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives To determine the feasibility of the dynamic visual acuity test (DVA) in children who are preschoolers. Methods Thirty-three preschoolers [3 years old ( n  = 11), 4 years old ( n  = 6), 5 years old ( n  = 8), and 6 years old ( n  = 8)], performed a static visual acuity test (SVA), a passive horizontal DVA (hDVA) at 1 and 2 Hz, and a DVA on treadmill at three age-specific walking speeds (slow/medium/high). The DVA scores, the difference between SVA and hDVA, were used to determine false positive results. Results The SVA was performed by 31/33 children, the hDVA and DVA on treadmill at slow and medium speed by 27/33 and the DVA on treadmill at high speed by 25/33. Except for one 5 years old, all drop-outs were 3 years old. The hDVA at 2 Hz was administered in only six children because of difficulties with focusing on reading the symbols at this frequency. False positive results for the hDVA at 1 Hz were found in 3/27 children, all 3 years old, and 2/6 for the hDVA at 2 Hz. Conclusions The DVA on treadmill seems useful for preschoolers from age 5, but this should be further investigated in children with underlying pathologies.
ISSN:0937-4477
1434-4726
DOI:10.1007/s00405-018-4919-2