Current status of multidisciplinary care in psoriatic arthritis in Spain: NEXUS 2.0 project

• Published in: Reumatología clinica (Barcelona) 2020-01, Vol.16 (1), p.24-31
• Main Authors: Queiro, Rubén, Coto, Pablo, Joven, Beatriz, Rivera, Raquel, Navío Marco, Teresa, de la Cueva, Pablo, Alvarez Vega, Jose Luis, Narváez Moreno, Basilio, Rodriguez Martínez, Fernando José, Pardo Sánchez, José, Feced Olmos, Carlos, Pujol, Conrad, Rodríguez, Jesús, Notario, Jaume, Pujol Busquets, Manel, García Font, Mercè, Galindez, Eva, Pérez Barrio, Silvia, Urruticoechea-Arana, Ana, Hergueta, Merce, López Montilla, M Dolores, Vélez García-Nieto, Antonio, Maceiras, Francisco, Rodríguez Pazos, Laura, Rubio Romero, Esteban, Rodríguez Fernandez Freire, Lourdes, Luelmo, Jesús, Gratacós, Jordi
• Format: Article
• Language: eng ; spa
• ISSN: 2173-5743
• DOI: 10.1016/j.reuma.2018.01.010

OBJECTIVE1) To analyze the implementation of multidisciplinary care models in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients, 2) To define minimum and excellent standards of care. METHODSA survey was sent to clinicians who already performed multidisciplinary care or were in the process of undertaking it, asking: 1) Type of multidisciplinary care model implemented; 2) Degree, priority and feasibility of the implementation of quality standards in the structure, process and result for care. In 6 regional meetings the results of the survey were presented and discussed, and the ultimate priority of quality standards for care was defined. At a nominal meeting group, 11 experts (rheumatologists and dermatologists) analyzed the results of the survey and the regional meetings. With this information, they defined which standards of care are currently considered as minimum and which are excellent. RESULTSThe simultaneous and parallel models of multidisciplinary care are those most widely implemented, but the implementation of quality standards is highly variable. In terms of structure it ranges from 22% to 74%, in those related to process from 17% to 54% and in the results from 2% to 28%. Of the 25 original quality standards for care, 9 were considered only minimum, 4 were excellent and 12 defined criteria for minimum level and others for excellence. CONCLUSIONSThe definition of minimum and excellent quality standards for care will help achieve the goal of multidisciplinary care for patients with PAs, which is the best healthcare possible.