Loading…

Comparison of [99mTc]3PRGD2 Imaging and [18F]FDG PET/CT in Breast Cancer and Expression of Integrin αvβ3 in Breast Cancer Vascular Endothelial Cells

Purpose This study aimed to investigate the value of 99m technetium-three polyethylene glycol spacers-arginine-glycine-aspartic acid ([ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 ) imaging in diagnosis and staging of breast cancer compared with 2-deoxy-2-[ 18 F]fluoro-D-glucose ([ 18 F]FDG) imaging, and to explore the expressi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular imaging and biology 2018-10, Vol.20 (5), p.846-856
Main Authors: Chen, Zhenying, Fu, Fangmeng, Li, Fang, Zhu, Zhaohui, Yang, Yinghong, Chen, Xiangjin, Jia, Bing, Zheng, Shan, Huang, Chao, Miao, Weibing
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264y-673340b899da8f6c6ed6783bfe21dd3152b35b8aef95b799a1608a32fbbe820f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264y-673340b899da8f6c6ed6783bfe21dd3152b35b8aef95b799a1608a32fbbe820f3
container_end_page 856
container_issue 5
container_start_page 846
container_title Molecular imaging and biology
container_volume 20
creator Chen, Zhenying
Fu, Fangmeng
Li, Fang
Zhu, Zhaohui
Yang, Yinghong
Chen, Xiangjin
Jia, Bing
Zheng, Shan
Huang, Chao
Miao, Weibing
description Purpose This study aimed to investigate the value of 99m technetium-three polyethylene glycol spacers-arginine-glycine-aspartic acid ([ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 ) imaging in diagnosis and staging of breast cancer compared with 2-deoxy-2-[ 18 F]fluoro-D-glucose ([ 18 F]FDG) imaging, and to explore the expression of integrin α v β 3 in tumor vascular endothelial cells. Procedures Forty-two women with suspected breast cancer underwent both [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 imaging and [ 18 F]FDG imaging. Visual analysis was used to assess primary breast lesion, axillary lymph node, and distant metastasis. The tumor-blood (T/B) ratios from [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 imaging and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) from [ 18 F]FDG imaging were analyzed for breast lesions. Integrin α v β 3 was analyzed through immunohistochemistry. Results Forty-five breast lesions were found (malignant, n  = 38; benign, n  = 7). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 and [ 18 F]FDG imaging in visual analysis for the breast lesion were 97.4, 87.5, and 95.6 % and 97.4, 71.4, and 93.3 %, respectively ( P  > 0.05). For semi-quantitative analysis, no significant difference of the area under the curves (AUC) was found in the imaging using the two radiopharmaceuticals (0.880 and 0.955; Z  = 0.88, P  > 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for axillary lymph node metastasis with [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 and [ 18 F]FDG were 78.05, 99.36, and 94.92 % and 85.37, 98.72, and 95.64 %, respectively ( P  > 0.05). Nine patients with distant metastases were all detected with the two radiopharmaceuticals. The expression of integrin α v β 3 was correlated with [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 uptake ( r  = 0.582, P  = 0.001), which were significantly higher in the HER2-positive and stage III–IV patients ( P  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11307-018-1178-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2010371771</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2009515216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264y-673340b899da8f6c6ed6783bfe21dd3152b35b8aef95b799a1608a32fbbe820f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFOGzEQhq0KpELoA_RmqRcuS2Zs1vYe2yUJkZCIqrQXhCzvrjddtOsNdoLIi_Ae8CA8E04XqVKrnmYO3__Pr_kJ-YxwhgByHBA5yARQJYhSJbsP5AiVgIQBsIO4p1wkKDj7SI5DuANAiYwfkae879bGN6F3tK_pTZZ1y_KWL77PLhidd2bVuBU1rqI3qKa304sZXUyW43xJG0e_eWvChubGldb_hiaPa29DaAazudvYlY_g6_PD6wv_V_LThHLbGk8nruo3v2zbmJbmtm3DCTmsTRvsp_c5Ij-mk2V-mVxdz-b516ukZOJ8lwjJ-TkUKssqo2pRClsJqXhRW4ZVxTFlBU8LZWydpYXMMoMClOGsLgqrGNR8RE4H37Xv77c2bHTXhDImMM7226AZIHCJUmJEv_yF3vVb72K6SEGWxmPxvyOCA1X6PgRva732TWf8TiPofVN6aErHpvS-Kb2LGjZoQmTdyvo_zv8XvQEQzpYn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2009515216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of [99mTc]3PRGD2 Imaging and [18F]FDG PET/CT in Breast Cancer and Expression of Integrin αvβ3 in Breast Cancer Vascular Endothelial Cells</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Chen, Zhenying ; Fu, Fangmeng ; Li, Fang ; Zhu, Zhaohui ; Yang, Yinghong ; Chen, Xiangjin ; Jia, Bing ; Zheng, Shan ; Huang, Chao ; Miao, Weibing</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zhenying ; Fu, Fangmeng ; Li, Fang ; Zhu, Zhaohui ; Yang, Yinghong ; Chen, Xiangjin ; Jia, Bing ; Zheng, Shan ; Huang, Chao ; Miao, Weibing</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose This study aimed to investigate the value of 99m technetium-three polyethylene glycol spacers-arginine-glycine-aspartic acid ([ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 ) imaging in diagnosis and staging of breast cancer compared with 2-deoxy-2-[ 18 F]fluoro-D-glucose ([ 18 F]FDG) imaging, and to explore the expression of integrin α v β 3 in tumor vascular endothelial cells. Procedures Forty-two women with suspected breast cancer underwent both [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 imaging and [ 18 F]FDG imaging. Visual analysis was used to assess primary breast lesion, axillary lymph node, and distant metastasis. The tumor-blood (T/B) ratios from [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 imaging and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) from [ 18 F]FDG imaging were analyzed for breast lesions. Integrin α v β 3 was analyzed through immunohistochemistry. Results Forty-five breast lesions were found (malignant, n  = 38; benign, n  = 7). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 and [ 18 F]FDG imaging in visual analysis for the breast lesion were 97.4, 87.5, and 95.6 % and 97.4, 71.4, and 93.3 %, respectively ( P  &gt; 0.05). For semi-quantitative analysis, no significant difference of the area under the curves (AUC) was found in the imaging using the two radiopharmaceuticals (0.880 and 0.955; Z  = 0.88, P  &gt; 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for axillary lymph node metastasis with [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 and [ 18 F]FDG were 78.05, 99.36, and 94.92 % and 85.37, 98.72, and 95.64 %, respectively ( P  &gt; 0.05). Nine patients with distant metastases were all detected with the two radiopharmaceuticals. The expression of integrin α v β 3 was correlated with [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 uptake ( r  = 0.582, P  = 0.001), which were significantly higher in the HER2-positive and stage III–IV patients ( P  &lt; 0.05). Conclusions The prospective study demonstrated that [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 imaging seems to be valuable for diagnosis of breast cancer and its staging. It may be less sensitive for detecting small lymph node metastatic lesions when compared with [ 18 F]FDG imaging. Integrin α v β 3 in tumor microvessels was associated with the breast cancer subtype and its staging.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1536-1632</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1860-2002</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11307-018-1178-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Arginine ; Aspartic acid ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Cancer ; Computed tomography ; Diagnosis ; Endothelial cells ; ErbB-2 protein ; Fluorine isotopes ; Glucose ; Glycine ; Imaging ; Immunohistochemistry ; Lesions ; Lymph ; Lymph nodes ; Lymphatic system ; Mammography ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Patients ; Polyethylene glycol ; Polyethylene terephthalate ; Quantitative analysis ; Radiology ; Research Article ; Sensitivity</subject><ispartof>Molecular imaging and biology, 2018-10, Vol.20 (5), p.846-856</ispartof><rights>World Molecular Imaging Society 2018</rights><rights>Molecular Imaging and Biology is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264y-673340b899da8f6c6ed6783bfe21dd3152b35b8aef95b799a1608a32fbbe820f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264y-673340b899da8f6c6ed6783bfe21dd3152b35b8aef95b799a1608a32fbbe820f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27900,27901</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zhenying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Fangmeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Zhaohui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yinghong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiangjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, Weibing</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of [99mTc]3PRGD2 Imaging and [18F]FDG PET/CT in Breast Cancer and Expression of Integrin αvβ3 in Breast Cancer Vascular Endothelial Cells</title><title>Molecular imaging and biology</title><addtitle>Mol Imaging Biol</addtitle><description>Purpose This study aimed to investigate the value of 99m technetium-three polyethylene glycol spacers-arginine-glycine-aspartic acid ([ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 ) imaging in diagnosis and staging of breast cancer compared with 2-deoxy-2-[ 18 F]fluoro-D-glucose ([ 18 F]FDG) imaging, and to explore the expression of integrin α v β 3 in tumor vascular endothelial cells. Procedures Forty-two women with suspected breast cancer underwent both [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 imaging and [ 18 F]FDG imaging. Visual analysis was used to assess primary breast lesion, axillary lymph node, and distant metastasis. The tumor-blood (T/B) ratios from [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 imaging and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) from [ 18 F]FDG imaging were analyzed for breast lesions. Integrin α v β 3 was analyzed through immunohistochemistry. Results Forty-five breast lesions were found (malignant, n  = 38; benign, n  = 7). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 and [ 18 F]FDG imaging in visual analysis for the breast lesion were 97.4, 87.5, and 95.6 % and 97.4, 71.4, and 93.3 %, respectively ( P  &gt; 0.05). For semi-quantitative analysis, no significant difference of the area under the curves (AUC) was found in the imaging using the two radiopharmaceuticals (0.880 and 0.955; Z  = 0.88, P  &gt; 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for axillary lymph node metastasis with [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 and [ 18 F]FDG were 78.05, 99.36, and 94.92 % and 85.37, 98.72, and 95.64 %, respectively ( P  &gt; 0.05). Nine patients with distant metastases were all detected with the two radiopharmaceuticals. The expression of integrin α v β 3 was correlated with [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 uptake ( r  = 0.582, P  = 0.001), which were significantly higher in the HER2-positive and stage III–IV patients ( P  &lt; 0.05). Conclusions The prospective study demonstrated that [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 imaging seems to be valuable for diagnosis of breast cancer and its staging. It may be less sensitive for detecting small lymph node metastatic lesions when compared with [ 18 F]FDG imaging. Integrin α v β 3 in tumor microvessels was associated with the breast cancer subtype and its staging.</description><subject>Arginine</subject><subject>Aspartic acid</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Endothelial cells</subject><subject>ErbB-2 protein</subject><subject>Fluorine isotopes</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Glycine</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Lymph</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polyethylene glycol</subject><subject>Polyethylene terephthalate</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><issn>1536-1632</issn><issn>1860-2002</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kcFOGzEQhq0KpELoA_RmqRcuS2Zs1vYe2yUJkZCIqrQXhCzvrjddtOsNdoLIi_Ae8CA8E04XqVKrnmYO3__Pr_kJ-YxwhgByHBA5yARQJYhSJbsP5AiVgIQBsIO4p1wkKDj7SI5DuANAiYwfkae879bGN6F3tK_pTZZ1y_KWL77PLhidd2bVuBU1rqI3qKa304sZXUyW43xJG0e_eWvChubGldb_hiaPa29DaAazudvYlY_g6_PD6wv_V_LThHLbGk8nruo3v2zbmJbmtm3DCTmsTRvsp_c5Ij-mk2V-mVxdz-b516ukZOJ8lwjJ-TkUKssqo2pRClsJqXhRW4ZVxTFlBU8LZWydpYXMMoMClOGsLgqrGNR8RE4H37Xv77c2bHTXhDImMM7226AZIHCJUmJEv_yF3vVb72K6SEGWxmPxvyOCA1X6PgRva732TWf8TiPofVN6aErHpvS-Kb2LGjZoQmTdyvo_zv8XvQEQzpYn</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Chen, Zhenying</creator><creator>Fu, Fangmeng</creator><creator>Li, Fang</creator><creator>Zhu, Zhaohui</creator><creator>Yang, Yinghong</creator><creator>Chen, Xiangjin</creator><creator>Jia, Bing</creator><creator>Zheng, Shan</creator><creator>Huang, Chao</creator><creator>Miao, Weibing</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Comparison of [99mTc]3PRGD2 Imaging and [18F]FDG PET/CT in Breast Cancer and Expression of Integrin αvβ3 in Breast Cancer Vascular Endothelial Cells</title><author>Chen, Zhenying ; Fu, Fangmeng ; Li, Fang ; Zhu, Zhaohui ; Yang, Yinghong ; Chen, Xiangjin ; Jia, Bing ; Zheng, Shan ; Huang, Chao ; Miao, Weibing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264y-673340b899da8f6c6ed6783bfe21dd3152b35b8aef95b799a1608a32fbbe820f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Arginine</topic><topic>Aspartic acid</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Endothelial cells</topic><topic>ErbB-2 protein</topic><topic>Fluorine isotopes</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Glycine</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Lymph</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polyethylene glycol</topic><topic>Polyethylene terephthalate</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zhenying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Fangmeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Zhaohui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yinghong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiangjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, Weibing</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Molecular imaging and biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Zhenying</au><au>Fu, Fangmeng</au><au>Li, Fang</au><au>Zhu, Zhaohui</au><au>Yang, Yinghong</au><au>Chen, Xiangjin</au><au>Jia, Bing</au><au>Zheng, Shan</au><au>Huang, Chao</au><au>Miao, Weibing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of [99mTc]3PRGD2 Imaging and [18F]FDG PET/CT in Breast Cancer and Expression of Integrin αvβ3 in Breast Cancer Vascular Endothelial Cells</atitle><jtitle>Molecular imaging and biology</jtitle><stitle>Mol Imaging Biol</stitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>846</spage><epage>856</epage><pages>846-856</pages><issn>1536-1632</issn><eissn>1860-2002</eissn><abstract>Purpose This study aimed to investigate the value of 99m technetium-three polyethylene glycol spacers-arginine-glycine-aspartic acid ([ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 ) imaging in diagnosis and staging of breast cancer compared with 2-deoxy-2-[ 18 F]fluoro-D-glucose ([ 18 F]FDG) imaging, and to explore the expression of integrin α v β 3 in tumor vascular endothelial cells. Procedures Forty-two women with suspected breast cancer underwent both [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 imaging and [ 18 F]FDG imaging. Visual analysis was used to assess primary breast lesion, axillary lymph node, and distant metastasis. The tumor-blood (T/B) ratios from [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 imaging and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) from [ 18 F]FDG imaging were analyzed for breast lesions. Integrin α v β 3 was analyzed through immunohistochemistry. Results Forty-five breast lesions were found (malignant, n  = 38; benign, n  = 7). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 and [ 18 F]FDG imaging in visual analysis for the breast lesion were 97.4, 87.5, and 95.6 % and 97.4, 71.4, and 93.3 %, respectively ( P  &gt; 0.05). For semi-quantitative analysis, no significant difference of the area under the curves (AUC) was found in the imaging using the two radiopharmaceuticals (0.880 and 0.955; Z  = 0.88, P  &gt; 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for axillary lymph node metastasis with [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 and [ 18 F]FDG were 78.05, 99.36, and 94.92 % and 85.37, 98.72, and 95.64 %, respectively ( P  &gt; 0.05). Nine patients with distant metastases were all detected with the two radiopharmaceuticals. The expression of integrin α v β 3 was correlated with [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 uptake ( r  = 0.582, P  = 0.001), which were significantly higher in the HER2-positive and stage III–IV patients ( P  &lt; 0.05). Conclusions The prospective study demonstrated that [ 99m Tc]3PRGD 2 imaging seems to be valuable for diagnosis of breast cancer and its staging. It may be less sensitive for detecting small lymph node metastatic lesions when compared with [ 18 F]FDG imaging. Integrin α v β 3 in tumor microvessels was associated with the breast cancer subtype and its staging.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s11307-018-1178-y</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1536-1632
ispartof Molecular imaging and biology, 2018-10, Vol.20 (5), p.846-856
issn 1536-1632
1860-2002
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2010371771
source Springer Link
subjects Arginine
Aspartic acid
Biopsy
Breast cancer
Cancer
Computed tomography
Diagnosis
Endothelial cells
ErbB-2 protein
Fluorine isotopes
Glucose
Glycine
Imaging
Immunohistochemistry
Lesions
Lymph
Lymph nodes
Lymphatic system
Mammography
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metastases
Metastasis
Patients
Polyethylene glycol
Polyethylene terephthalate
Quantitative analysis
Radiology
Research Article
Sensitivity
title Comparison of [99mTc]3PRGD2 Imaging and [18F]FDG PET/CT in Breast Cancer and Expression of Integrin αvβ3 in Breast Cancer Vascular Endothelial Cells
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T10%3A26%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20%5B99mTc%5D3PRGD2%20Imaging%20and%20%5B18F%5DFDG%20PET/CT%20in%20Breast%20Cancer%20and%20Expression%20of%20Integrin%20%CE%B1v%CE%B23%20in%20Breast%20Cancer%20Vascular%20Endothelial%20Cells&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20imaging%20and%20biology&rft.au=Chen,%20Zhenying&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=846&rft.epage=856&rft.pages=846-856&rft.issn=1536-1632&rft.eissn=1860-2002&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11307-018-1178-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2009515216%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264y-673340b899da8f6c6ed6783bfe21dd3152b35b8aef95b799a1608a32fbbe820f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2009515216&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true