Loading…

Population-based cross-sectional study to assess newborn hearing screening program in central Germany

Early diagnosis of congenital hearing loss is fundamental to minimize the negative consequences on the speech development. To lower the age at diagnosis and at intervention in hearing impaired children, not only universal newborn hearing screening (NHS) but also tracking is considered essential. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology 2018-04, Vol.107, p.110-120
Main Authors: Rissmann, Anke, Koehn, Andrea, Loderstedt, Marja, Schwemmle, Cornelia, Goetze, Gerrit, Bartel, Sylva, Plontke, Stefan K., Langer, Joerg, Begall, Klaus, Matulat, Peter, Roehl, Friedrich-Wilhelm, Vorwerk, Ulrich
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a049f7d509e6e6aaec7ef3f858a9e04d37c46c388dd2da5ce9ac7b7e9630f0d23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a049f7d509e6e6aaec7ef3f858a9e04d37c46c388dd2da5ce9ac7b7e9630f0d23
container_end_page 120
container_issue
container_start_page 110
container_title International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology
container_volume 107
creator Rissmann, Anke
Koehn, Andrea
Loderstedt, Marja
Schwemmle, Cornelia
Goetze, Gerrit
Bartel, Sylva
Plontke, Stefan K.
Langer, Joerg
Begall, Klaus
Matulat, Peter
Roehl, Friedrich-Wilhelm
Vorwerk, Ulrich
description Early diagnosis of congenital hearing loss is fundamental to minimize the negative consequences on the speech development. To lower the age at diagnosis and at intervention in hearing impaired children, not only universal newborn hearing screening (NHS) but also tracking is considered essential. The aim of the study was to evaluate the first six years after implementation of the population based newborn hearing screening program in Saxony-Anhalt, one German Federal State. The cross-sectional cohort study consisted of three cohort samples. Overall 102,301 infants born between January 2010 and December 2015 were included. NHS protocol was developed as dual target group protocol with two sub-protocols. The screening technique included Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) and Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR) test. Newborns were assigned to the sub-protocols according to their audiological risk factors. Additionally, to evaluate the quality of NHS and tracking (false-negative screening) we were analysing data from a cohort of hearing impaired children diagnosed up to the age of three years. We calculated quality indicators and compared them with international guidelines. 101,102 (98.8%) infants were screened. The prevalence of bilateral neonatal hearing loss was 2.32 per 1,000 newborns. The median age was two days at first screening, three month at diagnostic testing, and four month at intervention onset. 2.6% infants were lost to follow-up. 56.3% had a final diagnosis of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The sensitivity of 0.85 (KI 95%: 0.76-0.91) and a specificity of 0.84 (KI 95%: 0.84–0.85) was calculated for the NHS program. The analysis of benchmarks and outcomes of NHS demonstrated that the program reaches its main goal to identify the hearing impaired newborns in a timely manner.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.01.035
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2010837241</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S016558761830051X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2010837241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a049f7d509e6e6aaec7ef3f858a9e04d37c46c388dd2da5ce9ac7b7e9630f0d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi1ERZfCP0DIRy5Jx0kcOxckVJWCVAkO5Wx57UnxKrEXT0K1_75eduHIySPreefjYeydgFqA6K93ddjtU57qBoSuQdTQyhdsI7RqKt313Uu2KZispFb9JXtNtAMQCqR8xS6bQYJoBtgw_J7262SXkGK1tYSeu5yIKkJ3_LMTp2X1B74kbomQiEd82qYc-U-0OcRHTi4jxmO1z-kx25mHyB3GJZfwHebZxsMbdjHaifDt-b1iPz7fPtx8qe6_3X29-XRfua7RS2WhG0blJQzYY28tOoVjO2qp7YDQ-Va5rnet1t433kqHg3Vqq3DoWxjBN-0V-3DqW1b5tSItZg7kcJpsxLSSKapAt6rpREG7E_rn3oyj2ecw23wwAsxRsNmZk-BjShsQpggusffnCet2Rv8v9NdoAT6eACx3_g6YDbmA0aEPuTg1PoX_T3gG4i-RIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2010837241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Population-based cross-sectional study to assess newborn hearing screening program in central Germany</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Rissmann, Anke ; Koehn, Andrea ; Loderstedt, Marja ; Schwemmle, Cornelia ; Goetze, Gerrit ; Bartel, Sylva ; Plontke, Stefan K. ; Langer, Joerg ; Begall, Klaus ; Matulat, Peter ; Roehl, Friedrich-Wilhelm ; Vorwerk, Ulrich</creator><creatorcontrib>Rissmann, Anke ; Koehn, Andrea ; Loderstedt, Marja ; Schwemmle, Cornelia ; Goetze, Gerrit ; Bartel, Sylva ; Plontke, Stefan K. ; Langer, Joerg ; Begall, Klaus ; Matulat, Peter ; Roehl, Friedrich-Wilhelm ; Vorwerk, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><description>Early diagnosis of congenital hearing loss is fundamental to minimize the negative consequences on the speech development. To lower the age at diagnosis and at intervention in hearing impaired children, not only universal newborn hearing screening (NHS) but also tracking is considered essential. The aim of the study was to evaluate the first six years after implementation of the population based newborn hearing screening program in Saxony-Anhalt, one German Federal State. The cross-sectional cohort study consisted of three cohort samples. Overall 102,301 infants born between January 2010 and December 2015 were included. NHS protocol was developed as dual target group protocol with two sub-protocols. The screening technique included Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) and Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR) test. Newborns were assigned to the sub-protocols according to their audiological risk factors. Additionally, to evaluate the quality of NHS and tracking (false-negative screening) we were analysing data from a cohort of hearing impaired children diagnosed up to the age of three years. We calculated quality indicators and compared them with international guidelines. 101,102 (98.8%) infants were screened. The prevalence of bilateral neonatal hearing loss was 2.32 per 1,000 newborns. The median age was two days at first screening, three month at diagnostic testing, and four month at intervention onset. 2.6% infants were lost to follow-up. 56.3% had a final diagnosis of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The sensitivity of 0.85 (KI 95%: 0.76-0.91) and a specificity of 0.84 (KI 95%: 0.84–0.85) was calculated for the NHS program. The analysis of benchmarks and outcomes of NHS demonstrated that the program reaches its main goal to identify the hearing impaired newborns in a timely manner.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-5876</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.01.035</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29501290</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Cohort Studies ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Germany ; Hearing Loss - epidemiology ; Hearing screening ; Hearing Tests - methods ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Neonatal hearing loss ; Neonatal Screening - methods ; Newborn ; Prevalence ; Program Evaluation ; Sensitivity ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Specificity</subject><ispartof>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2018-04, Vol.107, p.110-120</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a049f7d509e6e6aaec7ef3f858a9e04d37c46c388dd2da5ce9ac7b7e9630f0d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a049f7d509e6e6aaec7ef3f858a9e04d37c46c388dd2da5ce9ac7b7e9630f0d23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9437-2790 ; 0000-0001-8863-4355</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29501290$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rissmann, Anke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koehn, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loderstedt, Marja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwemmle, Cornelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goetze, Gerrit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartel, Sylva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plontke, Stefan K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langer, Joerg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Begall, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matulat, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roehl, Friedrich-Wilhelm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vorwerk, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><title>Population-based cross-sectional study to assess newborn hearing screening program in central Germany</title><title>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</title><addtitle>Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><description>Early diagnosis of congenital hearing loss is fundamental to minimize the negative consequences on the speech development. To lower the age at diagnosis and at intervention in hearing impaired children, not only universal newborn hearing screening (NHS) but also tracking is considered essential. The aim of the study was to evaluate the first six years after implementation of the population based newborn hearing screening program in Saxony-Anhalt, one German Federal State. The cross-sectional cohort study consisted of three cohort samples. Overall 102,301 infants born between January 2010 and December 2015 were included. NHS protocol was developed as dual target group protocol with two sub-protocols. The screening technique included Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) and Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR) test. Newborns were assigned to the sub-protocols according to their audiological risk factors. Additionally, to evaluate the quality of NHS and tracking (false-negative screening) we were analysing data from a cohort of hearing impaired children diagnosed up to the age of three years. We calculated quality indicators and compared them with international guidelines. 101,102 (98.8%) infants were screened. The prevalence of bilateral neonatal hearing loss was 2.32 per 1,000 newborns. The median age was two days at first screening, three month at diagnostic testing, and four month at intervention onset. 2.6% infants were lost to follow-up. 56.3% had a final diagnosis of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The sensitivity of 0.85 (KI 95%: 0.76-0.91) and a specificity of 0.84 (KI 95%: 0.84–0.85) was calculated for the NHS program. The analysis of benchmarks and outcomes of NHS demonstrated that the program reaches its main goal to identify the hearing impaired newborns in a timely manner.</description><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hearing screening</subject><subject>Hearing Tests - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neonatal hearing loss</subject><subject>Neonatal Screening - methods</subject><subject>Newborn</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Specificity</subject><issn>0165-5876</issn><issn>1872-8464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi1ERZfCP0DIRy5Jx0kcOxckVJWCVAkO5Wx57UnxKrEXT0K1_75eduHIySPreefjYeydgFqA6K93ddjtU57qBoSuQdTQyhdsI7RqKt313Uu2KZispFb9JXtNtAMQCqR8xS6bQYJoBtgw_J7262SXkGK1tYSeu5yIKkJ3_LMTp2X1B74kbomQiEd82qYc-U-0OcRHTi4jxmO1z-kx25mHyB3GJZfwHebZxsMbdjHaifDt-b1iPz7fPtx8qe6_3X29-XRfua7RS2WhG0blJQzYY28tOoVjO2qp7YDQ-Va5rnet1t433kqHg3Vqq3DoWxjBN-0V-3DqW1b5tSItZg7kcJpsxLSSKapAt6rpREG7E_rn3oyj2ecw23wwAsxRsNmZk-BjShsQpggusffnCet2Rv8v9NdoAT6eACx3_g6YDbmA0aEPuTg1PoX_T3gG4i-RIA</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Rissmann, Anke</creator><creator>Koehn, Andrea</creator><creator>Loderstedt, Marja</creator><creator>Schwemmle, Cornelia</creator><creator>Goetze, Gerrit</creator><creator>Bartel, Sylva</creator><creator>Plontke, Stefan K.</creator><creator>Langer, Joerg</creator><creator>Begall, Klaus</creator><creator>Matulat, Peter</creator><creator>Roehl, Friedrich-Wilhelm</creator><creator>Vorwerk, Ulrich</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9437-2790</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8863-4355</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Population-based cross-sectional study to assess newborn hearing screening program in central Germany</title><author>Rissmann, Anke ; Koehn, Andrea ; Loderstedt, Marja ; Schwemmle, Cornelia ; Goetze, Gerrit ; Bartel, Sylva ; Plontke, Stefan K. ; Langer, Joerg ; Begall, Klaus ; Matulat, Peter ; Roehl, Friedrich-Wilhelm ; Vorwerk, Ulrich</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a049f7d509e6e6aaec7ef3f858a9e04d37c46c388dd2da5ce9ac7b7e9630f0d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hearing screening</topic><topic>Hearing Tests - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neonatal hearing loss</topic><topic>Neonatal Screening - methods</topic><topic>Newborn</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rissmann, Anke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koehn, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loderstedt, Marja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwemmle, Cornelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goetze, Gerrit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartel, Sylva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plontke, Stefan K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langer, Joerg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Begall, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matulat, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roehl, Friedrich-Wilhelm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vorwerk, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rissmann, Anke</au><au>Koehn, Andrea</au><au>Loderstedt, Marja</au><au>Schwemmle, Cornelia</au><au>Goetze, Gerrit</au><au>Bartel, Sylva</au><au>Plontke, Stefan K.</au><au>Langer, Joerg</au><au>Begall, Klaus</au><au>Matulat, Peter</au><au>Roehl, Friedrich-Wilhelm</au><au>Vorwerk, Ulrich</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Population-based cross-sectional study to assess newborn hearing screening program in central Germany</atitle><jtitle>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>107</volume><spage>110</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>110-120</pages><issn>0165-5876</issn><eissn>1872-8464</eissn><abstract>Early diagnosis of congenital hearing loss is fundamental to minimize the negative consequences on the speech development. To lower the age at diagnosis and at intervention in hearing impaired children, not only universal newborn hearing screening (NHS) but also tracking is considered essential. The aim of the study was to evaluate the first six years after implementation of the population based newborn hearing screening program in Saxony-Anhalt, one German Federal State. The cross-sectional cohort study consisted of three cohort samples. Overall 102,301 infants born between January 2010 and December 2015 were included. NHS protocol was developed as dual target group protocol with two sub-protocols. The screening technique included Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) and Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR) test. Newborns were assigned to the sub-protocols according to their audiological risk factors. Additionally, to evaluate the quality of NHS and tracking (false-negative screening) we were analysing data from a cohort of hearing impaired children diagnosed up to the age of three years. We calculated quality indicators and compared them with international guidelines. 101,102 (98.8%) infants were screened. The prevalence of bilateral neonatal hearing loss was 2.32 per 1,000 newborns. The median age was two days at first screening, three month at diagnostic testing, and four month at intervention onset. 2.6% infants were lost to follow-up. 56.3% had a final diagnosis of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The sensitivity of 0.85 (KI 95%: 0.76-0.91) and a specificity of 0.84 (KI 95%: 0.84–0.85) was calculated for the NHS program. The analysis of benchmarks and outcomes of NHS demonstrated that the program reaches its main goal to identify the hearing impaired newborns in a timely manner.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>29501290</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.01.035</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9437-2790</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8863-4355</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-5876
ispartof International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2018-04, Vol.107, p.110-120
issn 0165-5876
1872-8464
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2010837241
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Cohort Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Germany
Hearing Loss - epidemiology
Hearing screening
Hearing Tests - methods
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Male
Neonatal hearing loss
Neonatal Screening - methods
Newborn
Prevalence
Program Evaluation
Sensitivity
Sensitivity and Specificity
Specificity
title Population-based cross-sectional study to assess newborn hearing screening program in central Germany
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A19%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Population-based%20cross-sectional%20study%20to%20assess%20newborn%20hearing%20screening%20program%20in%20central%20Germany&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20pediatric%20otorhinolaryngology&rft.au=Rissmann,%20Anke&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=107&rft.spage=110&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=110-120&rft.issn=0165-5876&rft.eissn=1872-8464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.01.035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2010837241%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-a049f7d509e6e6aaec7ef3f858a9e04d37c46c388dd2da5ce9ac7b7e9630f0d23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2010837241&rft_id=info:pmid/29501290&rfr_iscdi=true