Response to letter to the editor by Mc Sween-Cadieux et al. (2017)

The development of the infographics was undertaken as part of a United Kingdom National Institute for Health Research-funded project and was based on existing evidence, as described by one of the authors in her blog [3].To address those questions, we used a qualitative approach and are currently ana...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical epidemiology 2018-08, Vol.100, p.133-134
Main Authors: Buljan, Ivan, Malički, Mario, Wager, Elizabeth, Puljak, Livia, Hren, Darko, Kellie, Frances, West, Helen, Alfirević, Žarko, Marušić, Ana
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cognitive style
Data Visualization
Knowledge
Language
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Reading
Students
Visual literacy
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The development of the infographics was undertaken as part of a United Kingdom National Institute for Health Research-funded project and was based on existing evidence, as described by one of the authors in her blog [3].To address those questions, we used a qualitative approach and are currently analyzing the results from focus groups of students, consumers, and doctors who were presented with different versions of infographics and PLSs to identify barriers to understand different summary formats for Cochrane systematic reviews.In our study, the students had a 20-minute break between reading the summary format and taking the knowledge test whereas the consumers and doctors could take the knowledge test right after a brief numeracy test.
ISSN:0895-4356
1878-5921
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.02.021