Loading…
Comparison of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in second trimester pregnant women and non-pregnant women
•We compared the onset and duration of rocuronium in pregnant and non-pregnant women.•The onset time of rocuronium did not differ significantly between the two groups.•The duration of rocuronium was significantly longer in second trimester pregnancy.•We hypothesize that differences are due to a rela...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of obstetric anesthesia 2018-05, Vol.34, p.10-14 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •We compared the onset and duration of rocuronium in pregnant and non-pregnant women.•The onset time of rocuronium did not differ significantly between the two groups.•The duration of rocuronium was significantly longer in second trimester pregnancy.•We hypothesize that differences are due to a relative reduction in liver blood flow.
This study set out to compare the onset and duration of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in second trimester pregnant women and non-pregnant women receiving general anesthesia.
Forty-seven pregnant (Group P) and forty-seven non-pregnant (Group C) women were enrolled. Anesthesia was induced with propofol 2.0 mg/kg and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg, and neuromuscular blockade was assessed with an accelerometric sensor using train-of-four stimulation (TOF-Watch® SX). Tracheal intubation was performed at maximum depression of the first twitch (T1) and anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane 1.5–2.5% and 50% oxygen in air. We recorded the times to maximum T1 depression and 5% and 25% T1 recovery, as well as the mean arterial pressure and heart rate at baseline, injection of rocuronium, intubation, and 5% and 25% T1 recovery.
The onset of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade (time to maximum T1 depression) did not differ significantly between the groups. The duration (time to 25% T1 recovery) was significantly longer in Group P than in Group C (45.7 ± 12.9 min vs 40.6 ± 10.4 min, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0959-289X 1532-3374 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.01.005 |