Fungi evolution revisited: application of the penalized likelihood method to a Bayesian fungal phylogeny provides a new perspective on phylogenetic relationships and divergence dates of Ascomycota groups

The depiction of evolutionary relationships within phylum Ascomycota is still controversial because of unresolved branching orders in the radiation of major taxa. Here we generated a dataset of 166 small subunit (18S) rDNA sequences, representative of all groups of Fungi and used as input in a Bayes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of molecular evolution 2005-06, Vol.60 (6), p.726-735
Main Authors: Padovan, Ana Carolina B, Sanson, Gerdine F O, Brunstein, Adriana, Briones, Marcelo R S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Ascomycetes
Ascomycota
Ascomycota - genetics
Bayes Theorem
Biological Evolution
DNA, Ribosomal - genetics
Evolution
Evolution, Molecular
Genes, Fungal
Heterogeneity
Likelihood Functions
Models, Genetic
Phylogeny
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Time
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The depiction of evolutionary relationships within phylum Ascomycota is still controversial because of unresolved branching orders in the radiation of major taxa. Here we generated a dataset of 166 small subunit (18S) rDNA sequences, representative of all groups of Fungi and used as input in a Bayesian phylogenetic analysis. This phylogeny suggests that Discomycetes are a basal group of filamentous Ascomycetes and probably maintain ancestor characters since their representatives are intermingled among other filamentous fungi. Also, we show that the evolutionary rate heterogeneity within Ascomycota precludes the assumption of a global molecular clock. Accordingly, we used the penalized likelihood method, and for calibration we included a 400 million-year-old Pyrenomycete fossil considering two distinct scenarios found in the literature, one with an estimated date of 1576 Myr for the plant-animal-fungus split and the other with an estimated date of 965 Myr for the animal-fungus split. Our data show that the current classification of the fossil as a Pyrenomycete is not compatible with the second scenario. Estimates under the first scenario are older than dates proposed in previous studies based on small subunit rDNA sequences but support estimates based on multiprotein analysis, suggesting that the radiation of the major Ascomycota groups occurred into the Proterozoic era.
ISSN:0022-2844
1432-1432
DOI:10.1007/s00239-004-0164-y